Using a subsample of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY97), this study (N = 2,471) provides evidence in support of social capital and socialization theories. Intergenerational transmission of civic engagement activities was found to occur through mechanisms such as parental religiosity and voluntarism. Using multinomial logistic regression analysis, correlates of four types of civic engagement were examined: mixed motivation voluntarism (voluntary participation in activist and nonactivist activities, n = 401), exclusively activist (n = 109), exclusive voluntarism (n = 652), and as the referent non—civic minded (no voluntary participation in either activist or nonactivist activities, n = 1,309). Parental voluntarism, socialization, religious participation, education, and presence of children were found to be robust predictors of mixed motivation voluntarism; parental devotion, presence of children, and race/ethnicity, of exclusive activism; and parental religious affiliation and fundamentalism, socialization, and religious participation, self-perceived sense of trustfulness, presence of children, and race/ethnicity of exclusive voluntarism.
Alexander, J. ( 2006). [Review of the book Cultivating democracy: Civic environments and political socialization in America]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 739-742.
2.
Becker, P.E., & Dhingra, P.H. ( 2001). Religious involvement and volunteering: Implications for civil society. Sociology of Religion, 62, 315-335.
3.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
4.
Bradley, E. ( 1995). Religious involvement and social resources: Evidence from the data set "Americans’ Changing Lives." Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34, 259-267.
5.
Center for Human Resource Research. (2007). A guide to rounds 1-9 data: National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997. Columbus: Ohio State University.
6.
Caputo, R.K. ( 1997). Women as volunteers and activists. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 156-174.
7.
Caputo, R.K. ( 2005). What’s morality got to do with it? An essay on the politics of moral values in light of the presidential election of 2004 . Families in Society, 86, 181-188.
8.
Cavendish, J.C. ( 2000). Church-based community activism: A comparison of black and white Catholic congregants. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39, 371-384.
9.
Cnaan, R.A., Handy, F., & Wadsworth, M. ( 1996). Defining who is a volunteer: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 364-383.
10.
Cnaan, R.A., Kasternakis, A., & Wineberg, R. ( 1993). Religious people, religious congregations, and voluntarism in human services: Is there a link?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22, 33-51.
11.
Cnaan, R.A., & McGrew, C.C. (2005). Social welfare. In H. R. Ebaugh (Ed.), Handbook of religion and social institutions (pp. 67-93). New York: Springer.
12.
Corporation for National and Community Service, Office of Research and Policy Development. (2007). Volunteering in America: 2007 state trends and rankings in civic life. Washington, DC: Author.
13.
Fichter, J.H. ( 1969). Sociological measurement of religiosity. Review of Religious Research, 10, 169-177.
14.
Galston, W.A. ( 2007). Civic knowledge, civic education, and civic engagement: A summary of recent research. International Journal of Public Administration, 30, 623-642.
15.
Greely, A. ( 2002, November 30). Religion and social capital. The American Prospect, 32, 68-73.
16.
Harris, F.C. ( 1994). Something within: Religion as a mobilizer of African-American political activism. Journal of Politics, 56, 42-68.
17.
Hodgkinson, V.A., Gorski, H.A., Noga, S.M., & Knauft, E.B. ( 1995). Giving and volunteering in the United States, 1994. Vol. 2: Trends in giving and volunteering by type of charity. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
18.
Hoge, R., Johnson, B., & Luidens, D.A. ( 1995). Types of denominational switching among Protestant young adults. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34, 253-258.
19.
Iannacone, L.R. ( 1990). Religious practice: A human capital approach. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 297-314.
20.
Jackson, E.F., Bachmeier, M.D., Wood, J.R., & Craft, E.A. ( 1995). Volunteering and charitable giving: Do religious and associational ties promote helping behavior? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24, 59-78.
21.
Jones, K.S. ( 2006). Giving and volunteering as distinct forms of civic engagement: The role of community integration and personal resources in formal helping . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 249-266.
22.
Kellstedt, L., & Smidt, C. ( 1991). Measuring fundamentalism: An analysis of different operational strategies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 259-278.
23.
King, M. ( 1967). Measuring the religious variable: Nine proposed dimensions . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6, 173-190.
24.
Lam, P.-Y. ( 2002). As the flocks gather: How religion affects voluntary association participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 405-422.
25.
Lam, P.-Y. ( 2006). Religion and civic culture: A cross-national study of voluntary association membership. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, 177-193.
26.
Lemon, M., Palisi, B.J., & Jacobson, P.E. (1972). Dominant statuses and involvement in formal voluntary associations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1(2), 30-42.
27.
Loveland, M.T., Sikkink, D., Meyers, D.J., & Radcliff, B. ( 2005). Private prayer and civic involvement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 1-14.
28.
Martin, M., Flagler, S.M., Forney, M., Lewis, A.D., Murphy, M., Shippee, M., et al. (1993). From voluntarism to paid work. Affilia, 8, 56-71.
29.
Mettler, S. ( 2007). Bringing government back into civic engagement: Considering the role of public policy. International Journal of Public Administration, 30, 643-650.
30.
Miklosi, J. ( 2007). Respecting, listening, and empowering: Three vital factors for increasing civic engagement inAmerican teenagers. National Civic Review, 96(2), 36-41.
31.
Musick, M.A., Wilson, J., & Bynum, W.B. ( 2000). Race and formal volunteering: The differential effects of class and religion. Social Forces, 78, 1539-1571.
32.
Park, J.Z., & Smith, C. ( 2000). "To whom much has been given . . .": Religious capital and community voluntarism among churchgoing protestants. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39, 272-286.
33.
Paxton, P. ( 1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 88-127.
34.
Paxton, P. ( 2005). Trust in decline? Contexts, 4, 40-46.
35.
The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. ( 2007). Religions in campaign ’08: Clinton and Guiliani seen as not highly religious; Romney’s religion raises concerns. Retrieved April 18, 2008, from http://pewforum.org/assets/files/religion-campaign08.pdf
36.
Putnam, R.D. ( 1995a). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital . Journal of Democracy, 61, 65-78.
37.
Putnam, R.D. ( 1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics , 28, 664-683.
38.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
39.
Sallaz, J.J., & Zavisca, J. ( 2007). Bourdieu in American sociology, 1980-2004. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 21-41.
40.
Skocpol, T. ( 1999a). Advocates without members: The recent transformation of American civic life. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 461-509). Washington, DC/ New York: Brookings Institution Press/ Russell Sage Foundation.
41.
Skocpol, T. ( 1999b). How Americans became civic. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 27-80). Washington, DC /New York: Brookings Institution Press/Russell Sage Foundation.
42.
Sleeper, J. ( 2007). A civic decline, but from what? America’s exceptional understandings of civil society. International Journal of Public Administration, 30, 671-682.
43.
Smith, D.H. ( 1974). Parental influence, socioeconomic status, and voluntary organization participation. Journal of Voluntary Action Research , 3, 59-66.
44.
Smith, D.H. ( 1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 243-263.
45.
Smith, D. H., Macaulay, J., & Associates (Eds.). (1980). Participation in social and political activities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
Smith, T.W. ( 1990). Classifying protestant denominations. Review of Religious Research, 31, 225-245.
47.
Swartz, D. ( 1996). Bridging the study of culture and religion: Pierre Bourdieu’s political economy of symbolic power. Sociology of Religion , 57, 71-85.
48.
Taylor, P. ( 2007). Rev. Falwell’s moral majority: Mission accomplished? Retrieved January 18, 2008, from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/481/falwell-moral-majority
49.
Uslaner, E.M. ( 2002). Religion and civic engagement in Canada and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 239-254.
50.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. ( 2008, January 23). Volunteering in the United States, 2007. Retrieved February 25, 2008, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/volun.pdf
51.
Verba, S., Scholzman, K.L., & Brady, H.E. ( 1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
Verba, S., Scholzman, K.L., Brady, H., & Nie, N.H. ( 1993). Race, ethnicity and political resources: Participation in the United States. British Journal of Political Science , 23, 453-497.
53.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. ( 1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work . American Sociological Review, 62, 694-713.
54.
Wineburg, R.J., Coleman, B.L., Boddie, S.C., & Cnaan, R.A. ( 2008). Leveling the playing field: Devolution through faith-based organizations. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 35, 17-42.
55.
Woodberry, R.D., & Smith, C.S. ( 1998). Fundamentalism et al: Conservative Protestants in America . Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 25-56.
56.
Wuthnow, R. ( 1999). Mobilizing civic engagement: The changing impact of religion . In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 331-363). Washington, DC/ New York: Brookings Institution Press/ Russell Sage Foundation.
