The Influence of Demographics and Distance on Nonprofit Location

Abstract

This article investigates the relationship between socioeconomic characteristics and the provision of nonprofit services for census block groups in Dallas County, Texas. We find that the number of health, education, and social service nonprofits in a given area is positively influenced by block group income, age, percentage minority, and racial heterogeneity, and negatively influenced by income heterogeneity and age heterogeneity. On further examination, we find a complex pattern of relationships between income and age and number of providers that suggests researchers should exercise caution when using these variables. Also, in all of our results the effects of the demographic variables are by far the strongest for nonprofits within one mile of the block group centroid; they weaken as they get farther from the centroid. This shows that nonprofits are most heavily influenced by the characteristics of the neighborhoods directly around them.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Clotfelter, C. T. (1992). Who benefits from the nonprofit sector? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Gronbjerg, K. A. (1989). Developing a universe of nonprofit organizations: Methodological considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 63-80.

Hodgkinson, V. A. , & Toppe, C. (1991). Anew research tool for managers: The national taxonomy of exempt entities. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1, 403-414.

James, E. (1987). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In W. W. Powell (Ed.) The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 397-415). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Lee, A. J. , & Weisbrod, B. A. (1977). Collective goods and the voluntary sector: The case of the hospital industry. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), The voluntary nonprofit sector: An economic analysis (pp. 77-100). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

McPherson, J. M. (1983). An ecology of affiliation. American Sociological Review, 48,519-532.

McPherson, J. M. , & Rotolo, T. (1996). Testing a dynamic model of social composition: Diversity and change in voluntary groups. American Sociological Review, 61, 179-202.

Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Marshfield, MA: Pittman.

Shughart, W. F. (1990). The organization of industry. Homewood, IL: BPI Irwin.

10.

Smith, D. H. (1975). Voluntary action and voluntary groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 247-270.

11.

Smith, D. H. (1994, October). The rest of the nonprofit sector: The nature, magnitude and impact of grassroots associations in America. 1994 Annual Conference Proceedings of the Association of Researchers in Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, 146-150.

12.

Tomeh, A. K. (1974). Formal voluntary organizations: Participation, correlates, and interrelationships. In M. Effrat (Ed.), The community (pp. 89-122). New York: Free Press.

13.

U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1990). Census of population and housing, 1990: Summary tape file 3A [machine-readable data file]. Washington, DC: Author.

14.

Weisbrod, B. A. (1986). Toward a theory of the voluntary sector in a three-sector economy. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), The economics of nonprofit institutions: Studies in structure and policy (pp. 21-43). New York: Oxford University Press.

15.

Wolch, J. R. , & Geiger, R. K. (1983). The distribution of urban voluntary resources: An exploratory analysis. Environment and Planning A, 15,1067-1082.

16.

Wolpert, J. (1989a). Prudence and parsimony: A regional perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 223-235.

17.

Wolpert, J. (1989b). Key indicators of generosity in communities. In V. A. Hodgkinson, R. W. Lyman, & Associates, The future of the nonprofit sector (pp. 377-402). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

18.

Wolpert, J. (1993). Decentralization and equity in public and nonprofit sectors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22, 281-296.