This article provides an organizational analysis that addresses the challenge of studying community-based groups lacking the characteristics of formal, rational organizations, doing so through the use of social and moral theory. It first addresses prominent schools of research in the contemporary sociology of religion as influenced particularly by resource mobilization and rational choice theories. In the course of so doing, it demonstrates the adequacy and limitations of resource mobilization theory for understanding religiously based organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ammerman, N. T. (1993). SBC moderates and the making of a postmodern denomination. Christian Century, 110, 896-899.
2.
Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
Boyte, H. C. (1989). Commonwealth: A return to citizen politics. New York: Free Press.
4.
Brand, K. (1990). Cyclical aspects of new social movements: Waves of cultural criticism and mobilization cycles of new middle-class radicalism. In R J. Dalton & M. Kuechler (Eds.), Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in Western democracies (pp. 23-42). New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Caldwell, M. (1994, October 23). Tying Nashville Together: A new coalition of diverse people is seeking to define a new and better dream for Nashville. Tennessean, p. D5.
6.
Clegg, S. (1990). Modern organizations: Organizational studies in a postmodern world. London: Sage.
7.
Cook, K. S., & Levi, M. (Ed.). (1990). The limits of rationality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Elster, J. (1986). Rational choice. New York: New York University Press.
9.
Fausey, V M., & TeSelle, G. (1994, January-February). Two organizing approaches. Southern Communities. (Southern Neighborhoods Network, Nashville, TN)
10.
Ferree, M. M. (1992). The political context of rationality: Rational choice theory and resource mobilization. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 29-52). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
Fisher, R. (1994). Let the people decide: Neighborhood organizing in America (rev. ed.). New York: Twayne.
12.
Greider, W. (1992). Who will tell the people: The betrayal of American democracy. New YorklSimon & Schuster.
13.
Habermas, J. (1981). New social movements. Telos, 49,33-37.
14.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon.
15.
Hannigan, J. A. (1991). Social movement theory and the sociology of religion: Toward a new synthesis. Sociological Analysis, 52, 311-331.
16.
Hunter, J. D., & Rice, J. S. (1991). Unlikely alliances: The changing contours of American religious faith. In A. Wolfe (Ed.), America at century's end (pp. 318-339). Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Industrial Areas Foundation. (1990). IAF 50 years organizing for change: Industrial Areas Foundation. New York: Franklin Square.
18.
Lancourt, J. E. (1979). Confront or concede: The Alinsky citizen-action organizations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
19.
Lohmann, R. (1992). The commons: New perspectives on nonprofit organizations and voluntary action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
McAdam, D. (1994). Culture and social movements. In E. Larana, H. Johnston, & J. R Gusfield (Eds.), New social movements: From ideology to identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
21.
Melucci, A. (1985). The symbolic challenge of contemporary movements. Social Research, 52, 789-816.
22.
Milofsky, C. (1988). Community organizations: Studies in resource mobilization and exchange. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Morris, A. D. (1984). The origins of the civil rights movement: Black communities organizing for change. New York: Free Press.
24.
Nashville Sponsoring Committee. (1991). What is the Nashville Sponsoring Committee?Nashville, TN: Author.
25.
Oberschall, A. (1973). Social conflict and social movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
Oberschall, A. (1993). Social movements: Ideologies, interests, and identities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
27.
Offe, C. (1985). New social movements: Challenging boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research, 52, 817-868.
28.
Reitzes, D. C., & Reitzes, D. C. (1987). The Alinsky legacy: Alive and kicking. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
29.
Rogers, J. (1994, January 29). Agendas: What's the big idea?Tennessean, p. B1.
30.
Rogers, M. B. (1990). Cold anger: A story of fait hand power politics. Denton: University of North Texas Press.
31.
Rooney, J. (1995). Organizing the South Bronx. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32.
Simmons, L. B. (1994). Organizing in hard times: Labor and neighborhoods in Hartford. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
33.
Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Jr., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micro mobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464-481.
34.
Touraine, A. (1985). An introduction to the study of social movements. Social Research, 52,749-787.
35.
Turner, R. H. (1975). Is there a quest for identity?Sociological Quarterly, 16, 148-161.
36.
Tying Nashville Together. (1993). 1992-93 list of contributors to TNT. Nashville, TN: Author.
Warren, M. R. (1995). Social capital and community empowerment: Religion and political organization in the Texas Industrial Areas Foundation. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Information Services.
39.
Zald, M. N., & McCarthy, J. D. (Ed.). (1987). Social movements in an organizational society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
