The subject of organizational effectiveness in nonprofit organizations, although controversial, remains important to both practitioners and researchers. In spite of this, the empirical research on the subject has never been comprehensively reviewed. This article reviews empirical studies of nonprofit effectiveness from the past 20 years. The review reveals that researchers have conceptualized effectiveness in a variety of ways and that the research objectives pursued in the study of effectiveness have changed over time. The review also shows that much recent research has employed an emergent or social constructionist approach to effectiveness that emphasizes issues of process over measurement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashford, K.
, & Clarke, J. (1996). Grant monitoring by charities: The process of grant-making and evaluation. Voluntas, 7,279-299.
2.
Au, C.
(1996). Rethinking organizational effectiveness: Theoretical and methodological issues in the study of organizational effectiveness for social welfare organizations. Administration in Social Work, 20,1-21.
3.
Bamard, C.
(1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Berger, P.
, & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
5.
Bradshaw, P.
, Murray, V., & Wolpin, J. (1992). Do nonprofit boards make a difference? An exploration of the relationships among board structure, process and effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21, 227-249.
6.
Byington, D.
, Martin, P., DiNitto, D., & Maxwell, M. (1991). Organizational affiliation and effectiveness: The case of rape crisis centers. Administration in Social Work, 15, 83-103.
7.
Cameron, K.
(1978). Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 604-629.
8.
Cameron, K.
(1981). Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 25-47.
9.
Cameron, K.
(1982). The relationship between faculty unionism and organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 6-24.
10.
Cameron, K.
, & Whetten, D. (Eds.). (1983). Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple models. New York: Academic Press.
11.
Caputo, R.
(1988). The tao of evaluation: Deriving good from flawed methodology. Administration in Social Work, 12, 61-70.
12.
Chait, R.
, Holland, T., & Taylor, B. (1991). The effective board of trustees. New York: MacMillan.
13.
Connolly, T.
, Conlon, E, & Deutsch, S. (1980). Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5, 211-217.
14.
Crittenden, W.
, Crittenden, V., & Hunt, T. (1988). Planning and stakeholder satisfaction in religious organizations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 17,60-73.
15.
Cutt, J.
, Bragg, D., Balfour, K., Murray, V., & Tassie, W. (1996). Nonprofits accommodate the information demands of public and private funders. Nonprofit Managenent & Leadership, 7, 45-67.
16.
Daft, R.
, & Weick, K. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9,284-295.
17.
Georgopolous, B.
, & Tannenbaum, A. (1957). The study of organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 22, 534-540.
18.
Glisson, C.
, & Martin, P. (1980). Productivity and efficiency in human service organizations as related to structure, size and age. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 21-37.
19.
Golden-Biddle, K.
, & Rao, H. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science, 8, 593-611.
20.
Goodman, P.
, Pennings, J., & Associates. (1977). New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Green, J.
, & Griesinger, D. (1996). Board performance and organizational effectiveness in nonprofit social services organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 6, 381-402.
22.
Herman, R.
(1990). Methodological issues in studying the effectiveness of nongovernmental and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19, 293-306.
23.
Herman, R.
, & Renz, D. (1997). Multiple constituencies and the social construction of nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 185-206.
24.
Herman, R.
, & Tulipana, F. (1985). Board-staff relations and perceived effectiveness in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 14, 48-59.
25.
Jobson, J.
, & Schneck, R. (1982). Constituent views of organizational effectiveness: Evidence from police organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 25-46.
26.
Kanter, R.
, & Summers, D. (1987). Doing well while doing good: Dilemmas of performance measurement in nonprofit organizations and the need for a multiple-constituency approach. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 154-166). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Kushner, R.
, & Poole, P. (1996). Exploring structure-effectiveness relationships in nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 7,119-136.
28.
Lillis, C.
, & Shaffer, P. (1977). Economic output as an organizational effectiveness measure for universities. Academy of Management Journal, 20,476-482.
29.
Meindl, J.
, Stubbart, C., & Porac, J. (1996). Cognition within and between organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Miller, D.
(1981). Toward a new contingency perspective: The search for organizational gestalts. Journal of Management Studies, 19, 1-26.
31.
Miller, L.
, Weiss, R., & MacLeod, B. (1988). Boards of directors in nonprofit organizations: Composition, activities and organizational outcomes. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 17, 81-89.
32.
Newman, W.
, & Wallender, H. (1978). Managing not-for-profit enterprises. Academy of Management Review, 6, 25-31.
33.
Ostroff, C.
, & Schmitt, N. (1993). Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1345-1361.
34.
Pfeffer, J.
(1982). Organizations and organization theory. Boston: Pitman.
35.
Price, J.
(1972). Organizational effectiveness: An inventory of propositions. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
36.
Provan, K.
(1980). Board power and organizational effectiveness among human service agencies. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 221-236.
37.
Provan, K.
, & Milward, H. (1995). A preliminary theory of inter organizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40,1-33.
38.
Quinn, R.
, & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29,33-51.
39.
Quinn, R.
, & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29,363-377.
40.
Schon, D.
(1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
41.
Schumaker, P.
(1980). The effectiveness of militant tactics in contemporary urban protest. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 9, 131-148.
42.
Schuster, J.
(1997). The performance of performance indicators in the arts. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 7, 253-269.
43.
Scott, W.
(1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Sheehan, R.
(1996). Mission accomplishment as philanthropic organization effectiveness: Key findings from the excellence in philanthropy project. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 110-123.
45.
Siciliano, J.
(1997). The relationship between formal planning and performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 7,387-403.
46.
Smith, D.
, & Shen, C. (1996). Factors characterizing the most effective nonprofits managed by volunteers. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 6,271-289.
47.
Starbuck, W.
, & Nystrom, P. (1983). Pursuing organizational effectiveness that is ambiguously specified. In K. Cameron & D. Whetten (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple models (pp. 135-161). New York: Academic Press.
48.
Stipak, B.
(1979). Citizen satisfaction with urban services: Potential misuse as a performance indicator. Public Administration Review, 41, 46-52.
49.
Stone, M.
, & Cutcher-Gershenfeld, S. (1996, September). Challenges of measuring performance in nonprofit organizations. Paper presented at the Conference of Independent Sector, Washington, DC.
50.
Tassie, B.
, Murray, V., Cutt, J., & Bragg, D. (1996). Rationality and politics: What really goes on when funders evaluate the performance of fundersNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25,347-363.
51.
Taylor, M.
, & Sumariwalla, R. (1993). Evaluating nonprofit effectiveness: Overcoming the barriers. In D. Young (Ed.), Governing, leading and managing nonprofit organizations (pp. 93-116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52.
Weick, K.
(1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
53.
Yuchtman, E.
, & Seashore, S. (1967). A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 32, 891-903.
54.
Zammuto, R.
(1982). Assessing organizational effectiveness: Systems change, adaptation and strategy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
