What accounts for the addition of new nonprofit organizations in different U.S. states? Do new nonprofit organizations answer calls for help (Band-Aid) or calls for proposals (bandwagon) at their inception? Are nonprofit entrepreneurs pushed by the failures of government and the market or pulled by the legitimacy of the organizational form? This comparative research models the level of nonprofit incorporation in different U.S. states given fragmented legal environments, variable organizational legitimacy, and different levels of social needs. Drawing from institutional, resource dependence, population ecology, and social movement theories and using data from state legal codes, judicial decisions, the U.S. census, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Nonprofit Almanac, 1992-1993, we explore the environmental and interorganizational forces that influence the level of nonprofit incorporation by state.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abzug, R (1994). Variations in trusteeship: A comparative historical study of the evolution of nonprofit boards. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
2.
Abzug, R
(1995). Different cities, different trustees. In R E. Fogal & D. F. Burlingame (Series Eds.) & C. H. Hamilton & W. F. Ilchman (Vol. Eds.), New directions for philanthropic fundraising: No. 7. Cultures of giving: How region and religion influence philanthropy (pp. 31-48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Abzug, R
, & Mezias, S. J. (1993). The fragmented state and due process protections in organizations. Organization Science, 4, 433-453.
4.
Abzug, R.
, & Webb, N. J. (1996). Another role for nonprofits: The case of mop-ups and nursemaids resulting from privatization in emerging economies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25,156-173.
5.
Baum, J.A.C.
, & Oliver, C. (1992). Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations. American Sociological Review, 57,540-559.
6.
Ben-Ner, A.
& Van Homissen, T. (1991). Nonprofit organizations in the mixed economy: A demand and supply analysis. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62 (4), 469-500.
7.
Ben-Ner, A.
, & Van Hoomissen, T. (1992). An empirical investigation of the joint determination of the size of the for-profit, nonprofit and government sectors. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 63(3), 391-415.
8.
Ben-Ner, A.
, & Van Hoomissen, T. (1993). Nonprofit organizations in the mixed economy: A demand and supply analysis. In A. Ben-Ner & B. Gui (Eds.), The nonprofit sector in the mixed economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
Dahl, R. A.
(1982). Dilemmas of pluralist democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Delacroix, J.
, & Carroll, G. R (1983). Organizational foundings: An ecological study of the newspaper industries of Argentina and Ireland. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 274-291.
11.
Delacroix, J.
, Swaminathan, A., & Solt, M. E. (1989). Density dependence versus population dynamics: An ecological study of failings in the California wine industry. American Sociological Review, 54, 245-262.
12.
DiMaggio, P. J.
, & Anheier, H. K. (1990). The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Review of Sociology, 16,137-159.
13.
DiMaggio, P. J.
, & Powell, W. W (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48,147-160.
14.
Douglas, J.
(1983). Why charity?Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
Douglas, J.
(1987). Political theories of nonprofit organization. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
Edelman, L.
(1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1401-1440.
17.
Edelman, L.
(1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97,1531-1576.
18.
Hall, P D.
(1987). A historical overview of the nonprofit sector. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
Hall, P. D.
(1992). Inventing the nonprofit sector and other essays on philanthropy, voluntarism, and nonprofit organizations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
Hannan, M. T.
, & Carroll, G. R (1992). Dynamics of organizational populations: Density, legitimation, and competition. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Hansmann, H.
(1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89, 835-901.
22.
Hansmann, H.
(1987a). Economic theories of nonprofit organization. In W. W Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Hansmann, H.
(1987b). The effect of tax exemption and other factors on the market share of nonprofit versus for-profit firms. National Tax Journal, 40(1), 71-83.
24.
Hodgkinson, V. A.
, Weitzman, M. S., Toppe, C. M., & Noga, S. M. (1993). Nonprofit almanac 1992-1993: Dimensions of the independent sector. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Meyer, J. W.
, & Scott, R. (Eds.). (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
Nelson, R.
, & Krashinsky, M. (1973). Two major issues of public policy: Public policy and organization of supply. In R. Nelson & D. Young (Eds.), Public subsidy for day care of young children. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
27.
Osborne, D.
, & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28.
Perrow, C.
(1991). A society of organizations. Theory and Society, 20, 725-762.
29.
Pfeffer, J.
, & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations:A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
30.
Phelan, M.
(1985). Nonprofit enterprises: Law and taxation. Deerfield, IL: Callaghan.
31.
Powell, W W.
, & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Rose-Ackerman, S.
(1986). Altruistic firms in competitive markets: The case of day-care centers in the United States. Journal of Consumer Policy, 9(3), 291-311.
33.
Schneider, J. C.
(1996). Philanthropic styles in the United States: Toward a theory of regional differences. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 190-210.
34.
Singh, J. V.
, Tucker, D. J., & House, R J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 171-193.
35.
Smith, S. R
, & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Suchman, M. C.
(1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20,571-610.
37.
Turnheim, J. K.
(1997). Determinants of the Chicago nonprofit sector: An analytical review. Chicago: Junior League of Chicago.
38.
Weisbrod, B.
(1974). Toward a theory of the voluntary non-profit sector in a three-sector economy. In E. S. Phelps (Ed.), Altruism, morality, and economic theory. New York: Russell Sage.
39.
Weisbrod, B.
(1977). The voluntary nonprofit sector. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
40.
Wolpert, J.
(1995). Giving and region: Generous and stingy communities. In R. E. Fogal & D. F. Burlingame (Series Eds.) & C. H. Hamilton & W F. Ilchman (Vol. Eds.), New directions for philanthropic fundraising: No. 7. Cultures of giving: How region and religion influence philanthropy (pp. 31-48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Zald, M. N.
(1967). Urban differentiation, characteristics of boards of directors and organizational effectiveness. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 261-272.
42.
Zald, M. N.
(1969). The power and function of boards of directors: A theoretical synthesis. American Journal of Sociology, 75,97-111.
43.
Zucker, L. G.
(1987). Institutional theories of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 13,443-644.
44.
Zucker, L. G.
(1989). Combining institutional theory and population ecology: No legitimacy, no history. American Sociological Review, 54, 542-545.
