Strategic philanthropy, according to the literature, is becoming the state of the art in corporate contribution management. The term is defined in this study as the process by which contributions are targeted to meet business objectives and recipient needs. It represents the integration of philanthropy into the overall strategic planning of the corporation. Given this trend, this research examines the extent to which corporate philanthropy has become predominantly a business deal with direct and measurable financial returns to shareholders. The study presents the results of a national survey of corporate direct contribution programs. The 226 corporations that responded to the mailed questionnaire were primarily large corporations from over 20 different industries. The findings suggest that contributions made directly by corporations are primarily used in less tangible ways to meet responsibilities to employees and their communities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alperson, M.
(1995). Corporate giving strategies that add business value: A research report (Report No. 1126-95-RR). New York: The Conference Board.
2.
Burke, E. M.
(1992, November). Community relations and the competitive edge. Corporate Community Relations Letter, pp. 1-8.
3.
Burlingame, D. F.
(1994). Empirical research on corporate social responsibility: What does it tell us?Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 4, 473-480.
4.
Burlingame, D. F.
& Kaufmann, D. A. (1995). Indiana business contributions to community service. Indiana polis: Indiana University Center on Philanthropy.
5.
Burlingame, D. F.
, & Frishkoff, P. A. (1996). How does firm size affect corporate philanthropy? In D. F. Burlingame & D. R. Young (Eds.), Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads (pp. 86-104). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
6.
Burlingame, D. F.
, & Young, D. R. (Eds.). (1996). Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
7.
Cloud, S., Jr.
(1991). The changing role of government and its impact on the nonprofit and business sectors. In J. P. Shannon (Ed.), The corporate contributions handbook (pp. 50-60). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Coy, J. F.
, & Nolan, B. J. (1992). Managing corporate support: Responses to challenging times. Indianapolis: Indiana University, Center on Philanthropy.
9.
Drucker, P.
(1989). The new pluralisms. New York: Harper & Row.
10.
Embley, L. L.
(1993). Doing well while doing good. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Freeman, R. E.
(1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
12.
Frishkoff, P.
, & Kostecka, A. (1991). Business contributions to community service. Corvallis: Oregon State University.
13.
Golden, D.
, & Yemma, J. (1998, May 31). Harvard amasses a $13b endowment. The Boston Globe, p. A24-A24.
14.
Gray, S.
, & Moore, J. (1996, July 11). Big gifts from big business. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, p. 18-18.
15.
Kaplan, A. E.
(1998). Giving USA 1998: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 1997. New York: AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy.
16.
Logsdon, J. M.
, Reiner, M., & Burke, L. (1990). Corporate philanthropy: Strategic responses to the firm’s stakeholders. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19, 93-109.
17.
MacAllister, J. A.
(1991). Why give? Notes to a new CEO. In J. P. Shannon (Ed.), The corporate contributions handbook (pp. 121-126). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Marx, J. D.
(1996). Strategic philanthropy: An opportunity for partnership between corporations and health/human service agencies. Administration in Social Work, 20(3), 57-73.
19.
Marx, J. D.
(1997). Corporate philanthropy and United Way: Challenges for the year 2000. Non-profit Management & Leadership, 8, 19-30.
20.
Marx, J. D.
(1998). Corporate strategic philanthropy: Implications for social work. Social Work, 43(1), 34-41.
21.
Mullen, J.
(1997). Performance-based corporate philanthropy: How “giving smart” can further corporate goals. Public Relations Quarterly, 42(2), 42-49.
22.
Murray, V.
(1991). Improving corporate donations: New strategies for grantmakers and grantseekers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Smith, C.
(1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 105-116.
24.
Smith, H.
(1993). The maturity of corporate giving and its long-term consequences. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 4, 215-228.
25.
Steckel, R.
, & Simons, R. (1992). Doing best by doing good. New York: Dutton.
26.
Tillman, A. D.
(1997). The corporate contributions plan: From strategy to budget: A research report (Report No. 1192-97-RR). New York: The Conference Board.
27.
Troy, K.
(1986). Meeting human needs: Corporate programs and partnerships (Report No. 88l). New York: The Conference Board.
28.
Wood, D. J.
(1990). Business and society. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
29.
Young, D. R.
, & Burlingame, D. F. (1996). Paradigm lost: Research toward a new understanding of corporate philanthropy. In D. F. Burlingame & D. R. Young (Eds.), Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads (pp. 158-176). Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
30.
Zetlin, M.
(1990, December). Companies find profit in corporate giving. Management Review, pp. 10-15.
31.
Zippay, A.
(1992). Corporate funding of human services agencies. Social Work, 37, 210-214.
