With increasing activity of volunteers in service provision, effectively managing voluntary involvement is a significant issue for local governments. This study examines the distribution of school-business and school-community-based-organization partnerships as voluntary efforts to improve urban education. This study uses multivariate regression analysis to examine the distribution of partnership programs as a function of school-level characteristics. Based on a consideration of the motivations for founding partnerships and the scope and sponsorship of the partnerships, several hypotheses are proposed. The study finds differences in the targeting to schools and students in the most need based on the scope of effort and the sponsorship. The findings have implications for the management and organization of partnerships in public schools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Annie E. Casey Foundation
. (1997). Success in school: Education ideas that count. Baltimore, MD: AEC Foundation.
2.
Brudney, J. L.
(1990). Fostering volunteer programs in the public sector: Planning initiating and managing voluntary activities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Burt, S. M.
, & Lessinger, L. M. (1970). Volunteer industry involvement in public education. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
4.
Comer, J. P.
, Haynes, N. M., & Joyner, E. T. (1996). The school development program. In J. P. Comer, H. M. Norris, E. T. Joyner, & M. Ben-Avie (Eds.), Rallying the whole village: The Comer process for reforming education (pp. 1-26). New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
DeLaat, J.
(1987). Volunteering as linkage in three sectors. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 97-111.
6.
Elkin, S. L.
(1987). City and regime in the American republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Gittell, M.
(1994). School reform in New York and Chicago. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 30, 136-151.
8.
Gronbjerg, K. A.
(1987). Patterns of institutional relations in the welfare state: Public mandates and the nonprofit sector. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 64-80.
9.
Haynes, N. M.
, Ben-Avie, M., Squires, D. A., Howley, J. P., Negron, E. N., & Corbin, J. N. (1996). In J. P. Comer, H. M. Norris, E. T. Joyner, & M. Ben-Avie (Eds.), Rallying the whole village: The Comer process for reforming education (pp. 42-71). New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
Henig, J.
(1996). Black leaders, White businesses: Racial tension and the construction of public-private partnerships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
11.
Houston Independent School District (HISD)
. (1995a). Community partnerships catalog. Houston, TX: Author.
12.
Houston Independent School District (HISD)
. (1995b). HISD: District and school profiles. Houston, TX: Author.
13.
Jones, B. L.
, & Malloy, R. W. (1988). Partnerships for improving schools. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
14.
Jones, R. R.
, Portz, J., & Stein, L. (1997). The nature of civic involvement and educational change in Pittsburgh, Boston, and St. Louis. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 844-870.
15.
Joy, M. F. (1990). Public-private partnerships in education: A study in implementation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Washington University.
16.
Levine, M.
, & Trachtman, R. (1988). American business and the public school: Case studies of corporate involvement in public education. New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
Longoria, T.
(1998). School politics in Houston: The impact of business involvement. In C. N. Stone (Ed.), Changing urban education (pp. 184-198). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
18.
Molnar, A.
(1996). Giving kids the business: The commercialization of America’s schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19.
Orr, M.
(1996). Urban politics and school reform: The case of Baltimore. Urban Affairs Review, 31, 314-345.
20.
Saidel, J. R.
(1989). Dimensions of interdependence: The state and voluntary-sector relationship. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 335-347.
21.
Shipps, D.
(1998). Corporate influence on Chicago school reform. In C. N. Stone (Ed.), Changing urban education (pp. 161-183). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
22.
Shive, J.
, & Rogus, J. H. (1979). The school-business partnership: A concept revitalized. Clearing House, 52, 286-290.
23.
Sirotnik, K.
(1991). Improving urban schools in the age of “restructuring.”Education and Urban Society, 23, 256-269.
24.
Smith, S. R. (1997). Successful community partnerships: Lessons learned from Project Northland and Houston Safe School Initiative. Unpublished manuscript, Graduate School of Public Affairs, University of Washington.
25.
Smith, S. R.
, & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Stone, C. N.
(1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
27.
Thomas, R. D.
, & Murray, R. W. (1991). Progrowth politics: Change and governance in Houston. Berkeley, CA: IGS Press.
28.
U.S. Department of Education
. (1994). Strong families, strong schools: Building community partnerships for learning. Washington, DC: Author.
29.
Waddock, S.
(1995). Not by schools alone: Sharing responsibility for America’s educational reform. Westport, CT: Praeger.
