The article reports from a qualitative study of family group conferencing in Wales.
Family group conferences are meetings of extended family networks that are convened
in order to plan for a child’s care and welfare. They are an attempt to
enable families to have a greater say in welfare decisions and often particularly
encourage children’s participation in the meetings. The research was a
qualitative study of 17 family meetings. Twenty-five children and young people were
interviewed within 1 month of the meeting and 13 were reinterviewed 6 months later.
Adult participants were also interviewed. The findings and discussion are related to
the following broad areas: the risks and benefits for children of taking part in
such interventions, some of the different priorities for children and adults
regarding participation and the potential tensions between individual needs and
rights and those of ‘the family’ as a whole.
Bartle, E.E.
,
G. Couchonnal
,
E.R. Canda
and
M.D. Staker
(2002)
‘Empowerment as a Dynamically Developing Concept for Practice:
Lessons Learned from Organizational Ethnography’
, Social Work47(1):
32-43
.
2.
Biehal, N.
,
J. Clayden
,
M. Stein
and
J. Wade
(1995) Moving On: Young People and Leaving Care Scheme.
London: HMSO
.
3.
Braithwaite, J.
(1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration.
New York: Cambridge University Press
.
4.
Brannen, J.
,
E. Heptinstall
and
E. Bhopal
(2000) Connecting Children: Care and Family Life in Later
Childhood.
London: Routledge/Falmer
.
5.
Butler, I.
and
H. Williamson
(1994) Children Speak: Children, Trauma and Social
Work.
Harlow: Longman
.
6.
Carr, S.E.
(2003)
‘Rethinking Empowerment Theory Using a Feminist Lens: The
Importance of Process’
, Affilia18(1):
8-20
.
7.
Cooper, D.
(1998)
‘More Law and More Rights: Will Children Benefit?’
, Child and Family Social Work3:
77-86
8.
Dalrymple, J.
(2002)
‘Family Group Conferences and Youth Advocacy: The Participation
of Children and Young People in Family Decision Making’
, European Journal of Social Work5(3):
287-299
.
9.
Department of Health
(1999) Working Together to Safeguard Children.
London: The Stationery Office
.
10.
Department of Health
(2000a) Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and
their Families.
London: Department of Health
.
11.
Department of Health
(2000b) Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and
their Families: The Family Pack of Questionnaires and Scales.
London: Department of Health
.
12.
Garrett, P.M.
(2003)
‘The Trouble with Harry: Why the “New Agenda of Life
Politics” Fails to Convince’
, British Journal of Social Work33:
381-397
.
13.
Giddens, A.
(1992) The Transformation of Intimacy.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
14.
Hassall, I.
(1996) ‘Origin and Development of Family Group
Conferences’, in
J. Hudson
,
A. Morris
,
G. Maxwell
and
B. Galaway
(eds) Family Group Conferences: Perspectives in Policy and
Practice,pp. 17-36.
Leichardt, NSW: The Federation Press
.
15.
Hill, M.
(1997)
‘Research Review: Participatory Research with Children’
, Child and Family Social Work2:
171-183
.
16.
Holland, S.
(2001) Family Answers: An Evaluation of a NCH Cymru
Project, report to NCH Cymru.
Cardiff: School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University
.
17.
Holland, S.
and
J. Scourfield
(2004)
‘Liberty and Respect in Child Protection’
, British Journal of Social Work34:
17-32
.
18.
Holland, S.
,
S. O’Neill
,
J. Scourfield
and
A. Pithouse
(2004) Outcomes in Family Group Conferences for children on the Brink
of Care: A Study of Child and Family Participation, Final Report to the
Wales Office for Research and Development in Health and Social Care.
Cardiff: School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University.
19.
Holland, S.
,
J. Scourfield
,
S. O’Neill
and
A. Pithouse
(2005)
‘Democratising the Family and the State? The Case of Family Group
Conferences in Child Welfare’
, Journal of Social Policy34(1):
59-77
.
20.
Hudson, J.
,
A. Morris
,
G. Maxwell
and
B. Galaway
(1996) Family Group Conferences: Perspectives in Policy and
Practice.
Leichardt, NSW: The Federation Press
.
21.
Immarigeon, R.
(1996) ‘Family Group Conferences in Canada and
the United States: An Overview’, in
J. Hudson
,
A. Morris
,
G. Maxwell
and
B. Galaway
(eds) Family Group Conferences: Perspectives in Policy and
Practice, pp. 167-179.
Leichardt, NSW: The Federation Press.
22.
Jans, M.
(2004)
‘Children as Citizens: Towards a Contemporary Notion of Child Participation’
, Childhood11(1):
27-44
.
23.
Kirby, P.
,
C. Lanyon
,
K. Cronin
and
R. Sinclair
(2003) Building a Culture of Participation: Involving
Children and Young People in Policy, Service Planning, Delivery and
Evaluation.
Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills
.
24.
Leadbetter, M.
(2002) ‘Empowerment and
Advocacy’, in
R. Adams
,
L. Dominelli
and
M. Payne
(eds) Social Work: Themes, Issues and Critical Debates, 2nd
edn, pp. 200-208.
Basingstoke: Palgrave.
25.
Lupton, C.
and
P. Nixon
(1999) Empowering Practice? A Critical Appraisal of the Family Group
Conference Approach. Bristol: The Policy Press.
26.
Lupton, C.
and
M. Stevens
(1997) Family Outcomes: Followiing Through on Family Group
Conferences, Portsmouth: SSIU, University of Portsmouth.
27.
McCallum, S.
and
I. Prilleltensky
(1996)
‘Empowerment in Child Protection Work: Values, Practice and Caveats’
, Children and Society10:
40-50
.
28.
Marsh, P.
and
G. Crow
(1998) Family Group Conferences in Child Welfare.
Oxford: Blackwell Science
.
29.
Maxwell, G.
and
A. Morris
(1996) ‘ Research on Family Group Conferences
with Young Offenders in New Zealand’, in
J. Hudson
,
A. Morris
,
G. Maxwell
and
B. Galaway
(eds) Family Group Conferences: Perspectives in Policy and
Practice, pp. 88-110.
Leichardt, NSW: The Federation Press.
30.
O’Quigley, A
(2000) Listening to Children’s Views: The Findings
and Recommendations of Recent Research.
York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation
.
31.
Pennell, J.
and
G. Burford
(2000)
‘Family Group Decision Making: Protecting Children and Women’
, Child WelfareLXXIX(2):
131-158
.
32.
Punch, S.
(2002)
‘Research with Children: The Same or Different from Research with Adults?’
, Childhood9(3):
321-341
.
33.
Robertson, J.
(1996) ‘Research on Family Group Conferencing in
Child Welfare in New Zealand’, in
J. Hudson
,
A. Morris
,
G. Maxwell
and
B. Galaway
(eds) Family Group Conferences: Perspectives in Policy and
Practice, pp. 49-64.
Leichardt, NSW: The Federation Press.
34.
Scourfield, J.
(2003) Gender and Child Protection.
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
35.
Servian, R.
(1996) Theorising Empowerment.
Bristol: Policy Press
.
36.
Shaw, M.
and
F. Jané
(1999) ‘Family Group Conferencing with Children under
Twelve: A Discussion Paper’, unpublished paper prepared for
the Canadian Department of Justice; at:
canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/yj/rp/doc/Paper107.PDF (accessed 3 February 2003).
37.
Shore, N.
,
J. Wirth
,
K. Cahn
,
B. Yancey
and
K. Gunderson
(2001) Long Term and Immediate Outcomes of Family Group Conferencing
in Washington State, Restorative Practice E-forum; at:
www.restorativepractices.org (accessed March 2003).
38.
Smith, C.
(1999)
‘Social Work as Rights Talk: The Eclipse and Re-Emergence of
Morality and Values Talk’
, paper presented at the BASW/University of Central Lancashire
conference: ‘Social Work: Making a Difference’,
Southport, March.
39.
Solomon, Y.
,
J. Warin
,
C. Lewis
and
W. Langford
(2002)
‘Intimate Talk between Parents and their Teenage Children:
Democratic Openness or Covert Control?’
, Sociology36(4):
956-983
.
40.
Sundell, K.
and
B. Vinnerljung
(2004)
‘Outcomes of Family Group Conferencing in Sweden: A 3-Year Follow-Up’
, Child Abuse and Neglect28:
267-287
.
41.
Thoburn, J.
,
A. Lewis
and
D. Shemming
(1995) Paternalism or Partnership? Family Involvement in the
Child Protection Process.
London, HMSO
.
42.
Thomas, N.
(2002) Children, Family and the State.
Bristol: The Policy Press
.
