The present article approaches the phenomenon of indirect bullying through detailed analysis of the interactional practices that a group of preadolescent girls make use of as they reconstruct the social organization of their peer group, the effect being that one girl is eventually excluded. The data are drawn from ethnography combined with video recordings of the girls’ peer group interactions in a Swedish elementary school, during one school year. The interactional data cover three different periods of the exclusion process. Overall, the study highlights how processes of social exclusion are situated within the flow of subtle and seemingly innocent actions that are embedded in ordinary everyday interactional peer group practices.
BjörkqvistKÖstermanKKaukiainenA (1992) The development of direct and indirect aggressive strategies in males and females. In: BjörkqvistKNiemelaP (eds) Of Mice and Women: Aspects of Female Aggression. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2.
CorsaroWA (1979) ‘We’re friends right?’: Children’s use of access rituals in a nursery school. Language and Society8: 315–338.
3.
CorsaroWA (1985) Friendship and Peer Culture in the Early Years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
CorsaroWA (2005) The Sociology of Childhood, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
5.
CrickNRCasasJFKuH (1999) Relational and physical forms of peer victimization in preschool. Developmental Psychology35(2): 376–385.
6.
CrickNRCasasJFNelsonDA (2002) Towards a more comprehensive understanding of peer maltreatment: Studies of relational victimization. Current Directions in Psychological Science11: 98–101.
7.
CromdalJ (2001) Can I be with? Negotiating play entry in a bilingual school. Journal of Pragmatics33(4): 515–543.
8.
DanbySBakerC (1998) How to be masculine in the block area. Childhood5(2): 151–175.
9.
EderD (1985) The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education58(3): 154–165.
10.
EderD (1995) School Talk: Gender and Adolescent Culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
EvaldssonA-C (2005) Staging insults and mobilizing categorizations in a multiethnic peer group. Discourse and Society16(6): 763–786.
13.
EvaldssonA-C (2007) Accounting for friendship: Moral ordering and category membership in preadolescent girls’ relational talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction40(4): 377–404.
14.
EvaldssonA-CTellgrenB (2009) Don’t enter – It’s dangerous: Negotiations for power and exclusion in preschool girls’ play interactions. Educational and Child Psychology25(2): 9–18.
15.
GoffmanE (1963) Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.
16.
GoodwinC (2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics32(10): 1489–1522.
17.
GoodwinMH (1990) He Said-She Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
18.
GoodwinMH (1993) Accomplishing social organization multi-modality in girls’ play: Patterns of competition and cooperation in an African-American working class girls’ group. In: HollisSTPershingLYoungMJ (eds) Feminist Theory and Folklore. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 149–165.
19.
GoodwinMH (2002) Building power asymmetries in girls’ interactions. Discourse and Society13(6): 715–730.
20.
GoodwinMH (2006) The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status and Exclusion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
21.
GoodwinMH (2007) Participation and embodied action in preadolescent girls’ assessment activity. Research on Language and Social Interaction40(4): 353–375.
22.
GoodwinMH (2008) The embodiment of friendship, power and marginalization in girls’ interactions. Girlhood Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal1(2): 72–94.
23.
GoodwinMHKyratzisA (in press) Peer socialization. In: DurantiAOchsESchieffelinB (eds) The Handbook of Language Socialization.
24.
GriswoldO (2007) Achieving authority: Discursive practices in Russian girls’ pretend play. Research on Language and Social Interaction40(4): 291–319.
25.
JeffersonG (1996) On the poetics of ordinary talk. Text and Performance Quarterly16(1): 11–61.
26.
KyratzisA (2004) Talk and interaction among children and the co-construction of peer groups and peer culture. Annual Review of Anthropology33: 625–649.
27.
KyratzisA (2007) Using the social organizational affordances of pretend play in American preschool girls’ interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction40(4): 321–352.
28.
OwensLShutePTSleeR (2000) Guess what I just heard: Indirect aggression among teenage girls. Aggressive Behavior26(1): 67–83.
SheldonA (1996) You can be the baby brother, but you aren’t born yet: Preschool girls’ negotiation for power and access in pretend play. Research on Language and Social Interaction29(1): 57–80.
31.
SheldonAJohnsonD (1994) Preschool negotiators: Gender differences in double-voice discourse as a conflict talk style in early childhood. In: SheppardBLewickiRBiesR (eds) Research on Negotiation in Organizations 4. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
32.
SimmonsR (2002) Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls. San Diego: Harcourt Books.
33.
SunWolfLeetsL (2004) Being left out: Rejecting outsiders and communicating group boundaries in childhood and adolescent peer groups. Journal of Applied Communication Research32(3): 195–223.
34.
ThorneB (1993) Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
35.
YoonJSBartonETaiariolJ (2004) Relational aggression in middle school: Educational implications of developmental research. Journal of Early Adolescence24(3): 303–318.
