Production Supervisors in Britain,Germany and the United States: Back from the Dead again?

Abstract

The recent diffusion of'lean production' work practices and various forms of team-working in manufacturing industry has revived old arguments about the likely decline of production supervisors. These issues are here submitted to empirical scrutiny through a detailed comparison of the skills and utilisation of supervisors in the British, German and American engineering industries. The threatened demise of supervisors is found to be exaggerated yet again for three main reasons. Firstly, supervisors' jobs have generally become more demanding and complex due to greater diversity in the product mix and more stringent quality and delivery targets. Secondly, in Britain and the US (although not in Germany) the average span of responsibility of supervisors has remained stable in recent years. Thirdly, there is evidence in all three countries that, far from making supervisors `redundant' in any way, the development of new work practices such as team-working can actually help to restore the influence of supervisors in strategic decision-making - by `freeing' them from their traditional immersion in the day-to-day details of shopfloor management.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appelbaum, E. and Batt, R. (1993) `Policy levers for high performance production systems', International Contributions to Labour Studies, 3, 1, 1-30.

Betts, J. (1980) Supervisory Studies, London: Macdonald and Evans.

Buchanan, D. and Preston, D. (1992) `Life in the cell: supervision and teamwork in a manufacturing systems engineering environment', Human Resource Management Journal, 2, 4, 55-76.

Child, J. and Partridge, B. (1982) Lost Managers: Supervisors in Industry and Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Danford, A. (1999) Japanese Management Techniques and British Workers, London: Mansell.

Delbridge, R. (1998) Life on the Line in Contemporary Manufacturing: The Workplace Experience of Lean Production and the `Japanese' Model, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Delbridge, R. and Lowe, J. (1997) `Manufacturing control: supervisory systems on the `new' shopfloor', Sociology, 31, 3, 409-426.

Drexel, I. (1993a) Das Ende des Facharbeiteraufstiegs?, Munich: Campus Verlag.

Drexel, I. (1993b) `Meisterausbildung: Offenheit schaffen und absichern', Die Mitbestimmung, 9, 55-58.

10.

Fischer, J. (1993) `Immer wieder einmal aktuell: Die “Meisterkrise” ', Journal für Sozialforschung, 33, 2, 139-170.

11.

Fischer, J. (1994) `Zwischen Erosion and Stabilisierung - Der Meister', in I. Drexel (ed.), Jenseits von Individualisierung und Angleichung, Munich: Campus Verlag.

12.

Graham, L. (1995) On the Line at Subaru-Isuzu: The Japanese Model and the American Worker, Ithaca, New York: ILR Press.

13.

Gordon, D. (1994) `Bosses of different stripes: a cross-national perspective on monitoring and supervision', American Economic Review, 84, 2, 375-390.

14.

IPRA (1993) Manufacturing Supervision: Consultations with Employers, Brighton: Innovation Policy Research Associates.

15.

Kruse, D. (1992) `Supervision, working conditions and the employer size-wage effect', Industrial Relations, 31, 2, 229-249.

16.

Lowe, J. (1993) `Manufacturing reform and the changing role of the production supervisor: the case of the automobile industry', Journal of Management Studies, 30, 5, 739-758.

17.

Mason, G. (1996) Shopfloor management skills in manufacturing: the formation of production supervisors in the United States, Germany and Britain, Report to the US Department of Labor, London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research (mimeo).

18.

Mason, G. and Finegold, D. (1997) `Productivity, machinery and skills in the United States and Western Europe', National Institute Economic Review, 162, 85-98.

19.

Mason, G. and Wagner, K. (1994) `Innovation and the skill mix: chemicals and engineering in Britain and Germany', National Institute Economic Review, 148, 61-72.

20.

NEDC (1991) What makes a supervisor world class?, NEDC Engineering Skills Working Party, National Economic Development Office, London, October.

21.

Osterman, P. (1994) `Supervision, discretion and work organisation', American Economic Review, 84, 2, 380-384.

22.

Osterman, P. (1995) `Skill, training and work organisation in American establishments', Industrial Relations, 34, 2, 125-146.

23.

Prais, S. and Wagner, K. (1988) `Productivity and management: the training of foremen in Britain and Germany', National Institute Economic Review, 120, 34-47.

24.

Rinehart, J. , Huxley, C. and Robertson, D. (1997) Just Another Car Factory? Lean Production and its Discontents, Ithaca, New York: ILR Press.

25.

Rose, D. , Marshall, G. , Newby, H. and Vogler, C. (1987) `Goodbye to supervisors?', Work, Employment and Society, 1, 1, 7-24.

26.

Schlesinger, L. and Klein, J. (1987) `The first-line supervisor: past, present and future', in J. Lorsch (ed.), Handbook of Organisational Behaviour, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

27.

Senker, P. (1994) `Supervision in manufacturing organisations', Journal of General Management, 20, 1, 44-61.

28.

Thurley, K. and Wirdenius, H. (1973) Supervision: A Reappraisal, London: Heinemann.

29.

Zink, K. and Steinmetz, W. (1996) Konsequenzen umfassender Qualitätsmanagementsysteme für die Meisterebene, Universität Kaiserslautern (mimeo).