Abstract
Owing to increasing labour market flexibilization, a growing number of people are likely to experience unemployment and, as a consequence, lower mental health and well-being. This article examines cross-national differences in well-being and mental health between unemployed people who engage in voluntary work and those who do not, using multilevel data from the European Quality of Life Survey on unemployed individuals in 29 European countries and other external sources. This article finds that, regardless of their voluntary activity, unemployed people have higher levels of well-being and mental health in countries with more generous unemployment benefits. Unexpectedly, the results also suggest that regular volunteering can actually be detrimental for mental health in countries with less generous unemployment benefits. This article concludes that individual agency exercised through voluntary work can partially improve well-being but the generosity of unemployment benefits is vital for alleviating the negative mental health effects of unemployment.
Keywords
Introduction
Growing global economic competition accompanied by the expansion of neo-liberal capitalism is restructuring employment. Increasing labour market flexibilization and the recent financial crisis mean many European countries are facing rising levels of non-standard forms of employment and unemployment (Barbieri, 2009; European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) and European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), 2013; Guichard and Rusticelli, 2010; Prosser, 2016) and despite wanting, being available for and seeking employment, a growing number of Europeans are experiencing periods of unemployment (International Labour Organization (ILO), 2015).
Unemployment brings a considerable range of negative short and longer-term individual and societal consequences, contributing to poverty and social inequality, including financial losses, lower living standards, social exclusion and a decline in the well-being, mental health and physical health of the unemployed person and his/her family (Brand, 2015; Gallie et al., 2003; McKee-Ryan et al., 2005). This raises the question of how work can be organized to minimize these negative effects in a society with growing levels of unemployment.
According to Beck (2000), societies should accept that full employment is disappearing, and move towards a post-work, multi-activity society where all forms of work – not only employment – are socially recognized, valued and financially rewarded. This article draws on Beck’s proposal as a way of addressing the challenges of unemployment by focusing on the potential effects such a multi-activity society could have on the well-being of the unemployed. This article argues that countries with more generous unemployment benefits represent an embryonic version of such a multi-activity society. In these countries the high level of welfare support is related to higher levels of labour decommodification (i.e. the extent to which individuals and their families can maintain socially acceptable standards of living independent of their employment status) (Esping-Andersen, 1990). This generous welfare support signals a degree of societal acceptance of a temporary exit from employment and enables individual agency by providing a space and resources for socially valuable regular voluntary work without high levels of financial worry. Drawing on Jahoda’s Latent Deprivation Theory (Jahoda, 1982) and Fryer’s Agency Restriction Theory (Fryer, 1986, 1992, 2001), this article argues that in countries with generous unemployment benefits, regular voluntary work during unemployment can at least partially compensate for the loss of the latent psychological and social benefits of paid work, thus reducing the negative effects of unemployment on subjective well-being and mental health. By contrast, countries with less generous unemployment benefits represent more traditional, paid work-focused societies with lower levels of decommodification. In this instance, therefore, voluntary work has a less positive effect on the mental health and well-being of the jobless.
As previous studies on voluntary work and well-being during unemployment have only been conducted in Sweden (Griep et al., 2015), this article also contributes empirically by examining the cross-national differences in the role that unemployment benefit generosity plays in the relationship between voluntary work, well-being and mental health. To do that it uses survey data from 29 countries with varying levels of unemployment, volunteering and unemployment benefits. This multilevel approach provides a refined understanding of the individual effects of voluntary work and the specific country factors moderating these effects.
The generosity of unemployment benefit and the relationship between voluntary work during unemployment, well-being and mental health
Unemployed people, on average, have poorer well-being and mental health than those in paid work (e.g. Burchell, 1994; Darity and Goldsmith, 1996; Jahoda, 1981, 1982; McKee-Ryan et al., 2005; Warr et al., 1988). Some of these differences can be explained by the selection effects: people with lower well-being and mental health are more likely to become unemployed. Unemployment itself also leads to a decline in well-being and mental health (Jefferis et al., 2011; McKee-Ryan et al., 2005; Paul and Moser, 2009; Wanberg, 2012). Although the intensity varies from person to person and country to country, the link between unemployment and decline in well-being and mental health is consistent over time and across cultures (Artazcoz et al., 2004; Green, 2011; Paul and Moser, 2009).
Two theories explain why unemployment has such negative effects on well-being and mental health. Both Jahoda’s Latent Deprivation Theory and Fryer’s Agency Restriction Theory emphasize that unemployment worsens an individual’s well-being and mental health because of the centrality of paid work as a social institution: paid work provides important manifest and latent benefits that are essential to that well-being (Jahoda, 1982). The manifest benefit of paid work is financial reward in the form of a wage. However, according to Jahoda (1982), employment is more than a source of income, supplying several latent socio-psychological benefits such as providing time structure, collective purpose and social contacts, identity and activity. The loss of these benefits due to unemployment damages both well-being and mental health.
Additionally, Fryer argues that the loss of latent psychological benefits alone does not explain the negative effects of unemployment. Becoming unemployed means losing not only a wage and an attachment to an important social institution, but also the ability to control one’s life. The experience of absolute or relative poverty damages well-being and mental health because of this loss of agency (Fryer, 1986, 1992, 2001).
Social scientists continue to debate the link between the loss of these benefits and the negative impact on well-being and mental health. Some studies suggest the loss of latent benefits is the most important (Winkelmann and Winkelmann, 1998), while others find that income has the largest negative impact (Creed and Macintyre, 2001; Ervasti and Venetoklis, 2010; Paul and Batinic, 2010; Weich and Lewis, 1998).
The negative effects of unemployment might be reduced if other social institutions provide a replacement for the lost manifest and latent benefits of paid work. This, according to Beck (2000), requires a transition from a work society focused on paid work to a multi-activity society in which housework, family work and voluntary work are valued alongside paid work. Beck argues that civil labour – socially recognized and valued work such as voluntary work, rewarded by public money – could benefit societies exhibiting increasing unemployment and under-employment. Civil labour could offer unemployed individuals an alternative source of activity, identity, purpose and other latent benefits.
By drawing on Beck’s idea of a multi-activity society, as well as the Latent Deprivation and Agency Restriction theories, this article hypothesizes that voluntary work in countries with generous unemployment benefits is related to higher levels of well-being and mental health among the unemployed than in countries with less generous unemployment benefits. Voluntary work here is defined as formal unpaid work carried out voluntarily in organizational settings such as charities (Taylor, 2004).
Voluntary work as unpaid, productive activity outside the household in the public domain (Glucksmann, 1995; Taylor, 2015; Tilly and Tilly, 1994) provides an unemployed individual with opportunities to exercise their agency via an alternative to employment. As another socially acceptable institution, voluntary work can compensate to some degree for the loss of the latent benefits of paid work. Voluntary work involves structuring one’s time and contributes to a collective purpose, such as providing services for those in need or assisting an organization, and is a source of social capital (Low et al., 2007). Qualitative studies find that voluntary work gives individuals an identity alternative to ‘the unemployed’ and opportunities to use their skills (Baines and Hardill, 2008; Corden and Sainsbury, 2005; Nichols and Ralston, 2011; Ockenden and Hill, 2009).
However, this article hypothesizes that the strength of the relationship between voluntary work during unemployment, well-being and mental health varies from country to country, depending on the level of unemployment benefits in the country. The positive relationship between volunteering during unemployment and psychological well-being and mental health is stronger in countries that have more generous unemployment benefits.
Countries with more generous unemployment benefits represent a version of Beck’s (2000) multi-activity society. The generosity of unemployment benefits in these countries signals a certain level of approval from the state for a temporary exit from the labour market (Beck, 2000: 162). The level of benefits also has a significant effect on the experience of unemployment (Gallie and Paugam, 2000). In countries with more generous welfare systems, people who become unemployed might experience less social stigma and lower financial stress while being able to exercise their agency through voluntary work. Countries with generous universal unemployment benefits for everyone, for example those classed by Esping-Andersen (1990) as socio-democratic welfare regimes, have a higher degree of decommodification of labour: citizens are less reliant on the labour market to maintain a decent standard of living than in countries with lower benefit levels. Therefore, voluntary work during unemployment in countries with higher benefit levels represents an embryonic version of civil labour in the multi-activity society imagined by Beck (2000). In these countries, voluntary work during unemployment could have more pronounced positive effects on well-being and mental health. Moreover, generous unemployment benefits might produce feelings of reciprocity between individuals doing voluntary work and society, which in turn may enhance their mental health.
By contrast, countries with less generous unemployment benefits represent more traditional, paid work-focused societies. Here, short or long-term exits from paid work are less acceptable, less financially supported and the levels of decommodification are low (Esping-Andersen, 1990). In such countries, individuals are dependent on paid work for survival and voluntary work could be associated with negative connotations (e.g. worries about financial survival and the social shame of not spending all one’s time looking for a new job). Therefore voluntary work might have a weak or negligible effect on well-being and mental health. Any beneficial effects accrued from engaging in voluntary work might be reduced or eliminated by the lower levels of financial support from the state.
Data and methods
This article used data from the European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS) (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EFILWC), 2014). These data captured a range of self-reported mental health and subjective well-being measures as well as information on volunteering, unemployment and demographic information. The EQLS individual-level data were matched with country-level data from external sources. The analyses were restricted to approximately 2440 unemployed respondents (depending on the outcome variable) living in 29 countries for whom complete individual and contextual information was available. The initial sample of unemployed people was 2629 but there were 189 missing cases which were distributed across the 18 individual-level variables (averaging 10.5 cases per variable).
Dependent variables
Basic descriptive statistics for the dependent variables and key independent variables by country are displayed in Table 1. Descriptive statistics for all dependent and independent variables are displayed in Table A1 and the correlation matrix for all key volunteering, unemployment, benefits, poverty and country-level variables is displayed in Table A2 (in the online appendix).
Descriptive statistics for the dependent variables and key independent variables by country.
This research is based on four outcome measures: one capturing mental health and three measuring subjective well-being.
These SWB measurements have good convergent validity with other assessments including expert ratings based on in-depth interviews, experience sampling in which feelings or level of satisfaction are reported at random moments in everyday life, participants’ reports of positive and negative events in their lives, smiling and the reports of friends and family (Dolan et al., 2011; Pavot et al., 1991; Sandvik et al., 1993). The reliability of SWB measures is sufficiently high, particularly in studies where group means are compared (Krueger and Schkade, 2008; Pavot and Diener, 1993).
Individual-level independent variables
The frequency of
Contextual-level variables
Analyses and presentation
All four dependent variables in this study were treated as continuous measures. To account for the clustering of data whereby individuals (level 1) live in countries (level 2), multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models (Snijders and Bosker, 1999) were estimated. Although the well-being scales were ordinal, where higher values equal higher levels of well-being and the gaps between the values are ambiguous, there were no substantive or statistical differences between multilevel ordered logit regression models and the multilevel mixed-effects linear regression model analyses presented (results available upon request). This article therefore reported the multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models for ease of interpretation. The consistent findings between model specifications were in line with previous work in this area (e.g. Diener and Tov, 2012; Ferrer-i-Carbonell and Frijters, 2004; OECD, 2013). All continuous independent variables were mean-centred.
Each dependent variable had two models. The first model included all individual and contextual-level variables, testing the relationships between engagement in voluntary work, country-level unemployment benefits and the outcome variables. The second model tested the hypothesis and included cross-level interactions where the coefficients for each volunteering frequency category at the individual level were allowed to vary across the level of unemployment benefits at the country level. The results are presented as regression coefficients alongside graphical representations of the hypothesis tests for statistically significant parameters.
Results
Before moving on to the results of the multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models, the bivariate relationship between the country average of each dependent variable and the unemployment benefit generosity, as well as the relationship between each of our dependent variables and the benefit generosity at different levels of volunteering were analysed and presented in Figures A1–A5 (in the online appendix).
Table 2 presents the multilevel mixed-effects linear regression results. The hypothesis that ‘the positive relationship between volunteering during unemployment and psychological well-being and mental health is stronger in countries that have more generous unemployment benefits’ was supported only in relation to volunteering frequency and mental health (model 1b). The regression coefficient for the interaction terms in model 1b between volunteering regularly and unemployment benefit generosity was 0.24, which indicated that unemployed people who volunteered more regularly were more likely to have better mental health in countries with higher unemployment benefits, compared with unemployed people who did the same level of volunteering in countries with a lower level of unemployment benefits. However, the negative, albeit insignificant, coefficient (−1.23) on the main effect of volunteering regularly suggested that regular volunteers in countries with low levels of unemployment benefits scored on average lower on the mental health scale compared with someone in a country with low unemployment benefits who did not volunteer. This finding suggested that the hypothesis needed to be revised.
Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models predicting mental health, happiness, satisfaction and a worthwhile life.
Notes: +p<0.10, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. Standard errors in parentheses.
GDP: gross domestic product; AIC: Akaike information criterion; BIC: Bayesian information criterion.
Source: European Quality of Life Survey 2011.
The model fit statistics (AIC (Akaike information criterion), BIC (Bayesian information criterion), deviance) demonstrated that models 1b, 2b, 3b and 4b were an improved fit over the previous models. There were also slight improvements in the level-1 and level-2 r2 statistics.
In addition, while simple bivariate and regression models typically show a positive relationship between voluntary work and SWB measures, this study did not find this consistently among unemployed people once the background and contextual characteristics were included (models 1a, 2a, 3a). The exception was model 4a, which showed that unemployed individuals who volunteered occasionally and regularly were significantly more likely to report that their lives were worthwhile compared with individuals who did not volunteer at all. This effect remained significant after the inclusion of the individual and contextual-level variables.
This study also found a consistent positive effect of unemployment benefit generosity on each of the measures of SWB and mental health. In countries with more generous unemployment benefits, all unemployed people had better mental health, more happiness and greater life satisfaction and life fulfilment – regardless of whether they volunteered or not – than those who were out of work in countries with less generous unemployment benefits.
The r2 statistics demonstrate that a considerable amount of variance was explained by the individual-level variables (1a=22.55%; 2a=23.06%; 3a=18.92%; 4a=7.45%). Furthermore, the models were also able to explain the large amount of variance in well-being and mental health between countries (1a=46.76%; 2a=74.73%; 3a=58.44%; 4a=59.76%).
There were also a number of consistent patterns across each outcome measure that demonstrated the importance of social networks for mental health and subjective well-being. Religious service attendance and frequency of seeing friends were both positively related with the outcome measures across all models (with the exception of happiness for religious service attendance). Material resources were also important correlates of mental health for unemployed people as the level of deprivation was negatively associated with all four outcome measures. Finally, general health was positively related with each outcome measure.
Figure 1 visualizes the cross-level interactions between unemployment benefit generosity, volunteering frequency and mental health. In countries where the income replacement rate was very low (ungenerous unemployment benefits), regular voluntary work was related to poorer mental health outcomes than either not volunteering or occasional volunteering. In contrast, regular volunteers had considerably higher levels of mental health in countries with generous unemployment benefits. Figure 1 also suggests that the more generous the unemployment benefits, the higher the mental health of all the unemployed, volunteers or not, even after controlling for all individual and contextual characteristics.

Cross-level interaction estimating the effect of country unemployment benefits on mental health at different frequencies of volunteering.
Figure 2 depicts the relationship between volunteering frequency and mental health in each country in our sample (countries are sorted according to the generosity of unemployment benefits). The figure suggests that in countries to the left side of the graph – Ireland to Finland – (i.e. those with the most generous unemployment benefits) unemployed people who volunteered frequently had higher levels of mental health than people who did not volunteer or did it occasionally. The welfare regimes in these countries, with the exception of Ireland, have been described as social democratic (Esping-Andersen, 1990) with a high degree of decommodification of labour: citizens are less reliant on the labour market to maintain a decent standard of living. Countries with the least generous unemployment benefits – Bulgaria to Greece – are shown on the far right of the graph. In most of these countries regular volunteers had the poorest mental health and occasional volunteers had the highest levels of mental health. The welfare regime in these countries is characterized as rudimentary and limited with very low levels of decommodification (Ferge and Kolberg, 1992). The countries in the middle of the graph – Germany to the Slovak Republic – were mainly Western European countries with conservative and liberal welfare regimes (e.g. France, Germany and the UK) (Esping-Andersen, 1990) and Eastern European countries with welfare regimes based on conservative or liberal principles coupled with low levels of welfare support (Fenger, 2007). In these countries, it was observed that voluntary work had mixed effects on mental health. These results suggest that a more detailed analysis of the role of other welfare support aspects in the relationship between volunteering and well-being would be useful. That, however, was beyond the scope of this article.

Volunteering while unemployed, benefit generosity and mental health, by country.
Discussion
This study contributes to the evidence regarding the factors that mitigate the negative effects of unemployment on SWB and mental health. It examines how the cross-national differences in unemployment benefit generosity moderate the relationship between voluntary work, SWB and mental health.
There are some unexpected results concerning the hypothesis proposed in this article. Jahoda’s Latent Deprivation Theory and Fryer’s Agency Restriction Theory suggest that unemployed people who engage in voluntary work regularly would have higher levels of mental health compared to unemployed people who volunteer less frequently or not at all. Furthermore, the theory suggests that this relationship would get stronger as the level of unemployment benefits increased. The results do support this hypothesis in relation to countries with generous unemployment benefits. However, the results also demonstrate that volunteering regularly in countries where benefits are less generous is actually associated with lower levels of mental health than for people in the same country who do not volunteer at all.
This study also found that unemployed people who volunteer regularly report that their life is more worthwhile than the unemployed, who do not volunteer, irrespective of the levels of benefits in their country. This is in line with other studies that have found positive effects of volunteering on well-being (e.g. Griep et al., 2015).
Another important finding is that the unemployed who live in countries with more generous unemployment benefits score higher on mental health and all SWB dimensions, regardless of voluntary activity. These findings suggest that generous unemployment benefits are crucial for maintaining the mental health and well-being of the unemployed. This is in line with previous studies which have found that higher levels of welfare support reduce the negative effects of unemployment on mental health and well-being as it lessens the levels of poverty, social exclusion and stress (Brennenstuhl et al., 2012; Ervasti and Venetoklis, 2010; McKee-Ryan et al., 2005).
The findings from this study have three important theoretical implications. Firstly, this article contributes to the debates about the future of work. Most of the proposed solutions for rising unemployment levels, such as the neo-liberal free market ‘race to the bottom’ and a reduction of the labour supply through extended education and early retirement, have focused on reducing levels of unemployment. This article took a different theoretical perspective and focused on how work in society could be organized differently.
The findings from this study suggest a possible solution that connects with Beck’s (2000) vision of a multi-activity society (i.e. engaging unemployed individuals in voluntary work supported by generous unemployment benefits). The findings indicate that financial support during periods of unemployment remains crucial for well-being and mental health. Although individuals can boost one dimension of their own well-being (feeling that their life is worthwhile) by exercising their agency through engaging in work that is an alternative to paid work, such engagement without any financial support can also damage their mental health. These findings suggest that financial support for the unemployed, through unemployment benefits, guaranteed basic income (Gorz, 1989), citizens income (Standing, 2011), etc., should occupy a central position in theoretical perspectives, focusing on reducing the negative effects of unemployment.
Secondly, the findings from this study highlight the limitations of the ‘sociological bias’ (Portes, 1998) currently dominating the research on the outcomes of voluntary work. As Portes has pointed out: ‘… it is our sociological bias to see good things emerging out of sociability’ (1998: 15). This sociological bias has been especially strong within the field of studying the consequences of voluntary work for volunteers, as the vast majority of studies have focused on its beneficial effects (Kamerāde, 2015). However, as Merton (1957) has emphasized, any social activity or institution can also have negative consequences. The results from this study suggest that in some countries under certain conditions, such as countries with less generous unemployment benefits, regular volunteers can actually have lower levels of mental health than non-volunteers. This finding suggests that further theoretical developments and empirical evidence is needed to explore a more balanced picture on the effects of voluntary work, considering both negative and positive aspects.
Thirdly, the results from this study highlight the importance of a cross-national comparative perspective when examining the potential effects of voluntary work during unemployment. While the cross-national differences in unemployment experiences are well documented (e.g. Gallie and Paugam, 2000), most of the studies on the outcomes of voluntary work have been conducted in the USA and a selected number of European countries, mainly in the UK, Netherlands, Sweden and Germany (Kamerāde, 2015). Most of these countries have relatively generous unemployment benefits and long historical traditions of formal voluntary work (Salamon and Anheier, 1999). This raises questions as to how far the findings from these institutional settings can be generalized to other cultural contexts with a very recent history of democracy and voluntary work, such as post-Soviet countries (Kamerāde et al., 2016). As this article demonstrates, a comparative cross-national perspective might lead to unexpected and theoretically important discoveries, such as the beneficial nature of regular voluntary work for unemployed people in one social and institutional context, but not in another.
There remain important caveats to the present study. This study utilizes cross-sectional data and the causal direction assumed is that the link between the frequency of volunteering and mental health is moderated by the generosity of unemployment benefits. The reverse of this is also theoretically possible (i.e. that unemployed people with better mental health are more likely to volunteer). However, the finding that regular volunteers actually have poorer mental health than non-volunteers in countries with less generous unemployment benefits challenges the latter assumption. It is possible though, that while unemployed people who have better mental health are more likely to engage in voluntary work, the effects of this work on their mental health depends significantly on the generosity of welfare in their country. To untangle the causal relationship in more detail, comparable data from several panel studies with large enough samples from countries with varied rates of welfare generosity would be needed. To our knowledge, such data are not currently available, especially from the countries paying very low benefits.
The findings have two key policy implications. Firstly, given that voluntary work is positively related to life fulfilment and mental health, in countries with generous welfare benefits it is advisable to provide the unemployed with opportunities to engage in volunteering so they can benefit from these positive effects. Secondly, the positive effects of regular voluntary work on mental health and well-being can be maximized with generous unemployment benefits. Concerns that regular volunteering and generous unemployment benefits may result in the so-called ‘lock-in effect’ (Røed and Raaum, 2006), by discouraging the unemployed from searching for paid work in the labour market, may be unfounded given that Van der Wel and Halvorsen (2015) found that welfare generosity is not detrimental to employment commitment and motivation to work. Furthermore, if voluntary work does improve mental health, then it has the potential to increase the capability of someone who is unemployed to find a paid job.
The findings by no means suggest that unemployment benefit claimants should be pressurized to do ‘voluntary’ work, as that already happens in England (BBC, 2015) despite there being no robust evidence that such activities increase their chances of securing paid work (Kamerāde and Ellis Paine, 2014). Voluntary work is by definition work undertaken voluntarily; it is not compulsory labour. The well-being and mental health benefits that are generated through voluntary work may not exist at all if the unemployed are forced to carry out compulsory community work or have their benefits cut.
This article concludes that voluntary work during unemployment can have positive effects on well-being and mental health, which increase with higher rates of unemployment benefit, while volunteering regularly and getting little in the way of welfare support can damage one’s mental health.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for providing valuable feedback on earlier versions of the manuscript.
Funding
This article was produced as a part of the ‘Third Sector Impact’ research project which received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no. 613034.
Notes
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
