A proper understanding of party system change demands a dynamic theory of party competition. This should integrate accounts of competition in the legislative party system, in particular coalition formation, with accounts of competition in the electoral party system, in particular vote maximization. Some of the implications of integrating the two facets of party competition are explored, with special attention to endogeneous changes in party systems produced as part of the process of competition. Such changes may operate in different directions in different parts of the system and the consequent damping effect may contribute to the relative stability of party systems.
Austen-Smith, David
and Jeffrey Banks (1988) `Elections, Coalitions and Legislative Outcomes', American Political Science Review82(2): 405-422.
2.
Budge, Ian
and Dennis Farlie (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Parts Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. George Allen and Unwin.
3.
Budge, Ian
and Michael Laver (1986) `Office Seeking and Policy Pursuit in Coalition Theory', Legislative Studies Quarterlyxi(4) 485-506.
4.
Frohlich, Norman, Joe Oppenheimer
and Oran Young (1971) Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
Grofman, Bernard
(1982) `A Dynamic Model of Protocoalition Formation in Ideological n-space', Behavioural Science27: 77-90.
6.
Laver, Michael
(1981) The Politics of Private Desires. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
7.
Laver, Michael (forthcoming) `The Relationship between Party and Coalition Policy in Ireland', in Laver and Budge (forthcoming).
8.
Laver, Michael
and Ian Budge (eds) (forthcoming) Party Policy and Coalition Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Laver, Michael
and Norman Schofield (1990) Multiplying Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Schofield, Norman
(1982) `Bargaining Set Theory and Stability in Coalition Governments', Mathematical Social Sciences3: 9-31.
11.
Schofield, Norman
(1986) `Existence of a “Structurally Stable” Equilibrium for a Non-collegial Voting Rule', Public Choice51: 267-284.
12.
Schofield, Norman
and Michael Laver (1985) `Bargaining Theory and Portfolio Payoffs in European Coalition Governments 1945-83'British Journal of Political Science15.
13.
Shapley, Lloyd
and Martin Shubik (1954) `A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System', American Political Science Review48: 787-792.
14.
Shepsle, Kenneth
and Ronald Cohen (forthcoming) `Multiparty Competition, Entry and Entry Deterrence in Spatial Models of Elections', in James Enelow and Melvin Hinich (eds) Readings in the Spatial Theory of Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.
15.
Strom, Kaare
, (1984) `Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies', Comparative Political Studies17(2): 199-227.
