Rational choice theories could be improved, their scope broadened, and their explanations made more powerful by asking not only `How do people go about getting what they know they want?' but also `Why do people want what they want in the first place?'. The advantages of combining a theory of goal direction, which is the operational base of rational choice, and a theory of preference formation are manifold: a monistic conception of cause as self-interest is replaced by a pluralistic conception of culture allowing for a variety of motives for action; master objectives, which play out over a sequence of moves, supersede immediate objectives that cover only the next act; concentration on how institutional rules influence incentives, though valuable in and of itself, gives way to a parallel consideration of how individuals shape institutions; and the overwhelming concentration on material self-interest, which discomforts so many social scientists who might otherwise be well disposed to rational choice explanations, opens up into a diversity of selves who construct a variety of interests in the service of different ways of life (or cultures).
Banfield, Edward
(1958) The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York: Free Press.
5.
Barry, Brian
(1990) Political Argument: A Reissue with a New Introduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Becker, Gary S.
(1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Becker, Gary S. (1992) `The Economic Way of Looking at Life', a slightly revised version of his Nobel Lecture, delivered September 9, 1992. Typescript.
8.
Boland, Lawrence A.
(1981) `On the Futility of Criticizing the Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis', The American Economic Review (December) 71(5): 1031-1036.
9.
Brams, Steve J.
(1976) Paradoxes and Politics: An Introduction to the Nonobvious in Political Science. New York: Free Press.
10.
Buchanan, James M.
and Gordon Tullock (1965) The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11.
Citrin, Jack
and Donald Philip Green (1990) `The Self-Interest Motive in American Public Opinion', Research in Micro-Politics3: 1-28.
12.
Coleman, James S.
(1986) Individual Interests and Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Coleman, James S.
(1990) Foundation of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
14.
Coyle, Dennis
and Aaron Wildavsky (1987) `Requisites of Radical Reform: Income Maintenance versus Tax Preferences', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management7: 1-16.
15.
Dake, Karl
and Aaron Wildavsky (1990) `Theories of Risk Perception: Who Fears What and Why', Daedalus4: 41-60.
16.
Denzin, Norman K.
(1990) `Reading Rational Choice Theory.'Rationality and Society, 2: 172-189.
17.
Douglas, Mary
(1970) Natural Symbols, Explorations in Cosmology. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.
18.
Douglas, Mary
(1992) `Thought Style Exemplified: The Idea of the Self', in M. Douglas (ed.) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
19.
Downs, Anthony
(1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Bros.
20.
Dumont, Louis
(1986) Essays on Individualism: Modern Ideology in Anthropological Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
England, Paula
and Barbara Stanek Kilbourne (1990) `Feminist Critiques of the Separative Model of Self: Implications for Rational Choice Theory', Rationality and Society2: 156-171.
22.
Enzell, Magnus and Aaron Wildavsky (1991) `Hobbes' Self-Interested Egoist Is Not an Individualist but a Fatalist', unpublished manuscript.
23.
Freeman, Jo
(1983) `On the Tyranny of Structurelessness', in J. Freeman (ed.) Social Movements of the Sixties and Seventies. New York: Longman.
24.
Harsanyi, John C.
(1976) Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
25.
Iannaccone, Laurence R.
(1991) `The Consequences of Religious Market Structure: Adam Smith and the Economics of Religion', Rationality and Society3: 156-177.
26.
Krupp, Sherman
(1963) `Analytical Economics and the Logic of External Effects', The American Economic ReviewLII(May) (2), Papers and Proceedings of the 75th Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, 22-29 December, 1962, pp. 220-1.
27.
Lockhart, Charles
and Richard M. Coughlin (1992) `Building Better Comparative Social Theory Through Alternative Conceptions of Rationality: A Review Essay', Western Political Quarterly45(3) September: 793-809.
28.
Macaulay, T.B.
(1906) `Mill on Government', WorksVII, pp. 326-371. London: Longmans, Green.
29.
Margolis, Howard
(1982) Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality: A Theory of Social Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Meier, Gerald M.
(1991) `Policy Lessons and Policy Formation', in G. M. Meier (ed.) Politics and Policy Making in Developing Countries: Perspectives on the New Political Economy. San Francisco: ICS Press.
31.
Monroe, Kristin Renwick
, ed. (1991a) The Economic Approach to Politics: A Critical Reassessment of the Theory of Rational Action. New York: Harper Collins.
32.
Monroe, Kristin Renwick
(1991b) `John Donne's People: Explaining Differences between Rational Acts and Activists through Cognitive Frameworks', Journal of Politics53:394-433.
33.
Monroe, Kristin Renwick
(1991c) `The Theory of Rational Action: Its Origins and Usefulness for Political Science', In K. R. Monroe (ed.) The Economic Approach to Politics: A Critical Reassessment of the Theory of Rational Action. New York: Harper Collins.
34.
Olson, Mancur, Jr
(1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Parks, Robert Q.
(1982) `Interests and the Politics of Choice', Political Theory10: 547-565.
36.
Rand, Ayn
(1964) The Virtue of Selfishness. New York: New American Library.
37.
Riker, William (1991) `The Political Psychology of Rational Choice', unpublished manuscript.
38.
Rosenberg, Alexander
(1992) Economics - Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns?Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
39.
Rubin, Edward L.
(1991) `Beyond Public Choice: Comprehension of Rationality in the Writing and Reading of Statutes', New York University Law Review2: 172-189.
40.
Rule, James B.
(1992) `Rational Choice and the Limits of Theoretical Generality', Rationality and Society4(4) October451-469.
41.
Ryan, Alan
(1974) J. S. Mill. Routledge Author Guides. London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
42.
Schwartz, Peter
(1991) `US Interests in the Persian Gulf', in Peter Schwartz (editor and publisher) The Intellectual Activist 5(6): 2-5.
43.
Schwarz, Michiel
and Michael Thompson (1990) Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf; Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
44.
Simon, Herbert
(1985) `Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science', The American Political Science Review79: 293-304.
45.
Stigler, George J.
and Gary S. Becker (1977) `De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum', The American Economic Review (March), 67(2): pp. 76-90.
46.
Thompson, Michael
(1979) Rubbish Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
Thompson, Michael
, Richard Ellis and Aaron Wildavsky (1990) Cultural Theory. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.
48.
Wildavsky, Aaron
(1989) `A Cultural Theory of Leadership', in Bryan D. Jones (ed.) Leadership and Politics: New Perspectives in Political Science. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
49.
Wolfe, Alan
(1989) Whose Keeper? Social Science and Moral Obligation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
