The paradoxes within the ‘modernising’ project for local government have been well documented. However, these can be used to locate the local government agenda within broader changes to the welfare state. New Labour, in line with Third Way thinking, are attempting to create an ‘active welfare’ state, which stresses rights and responsibilities. Key elements here are duty to become involved and take up opportunities. As a part of the welfare system, Local authorities are responsible for implementing this agenda and for including themselves within it. The increasing move towards whole organisational audit and of ‘earned autonomy’ can be seen in this light. ‘Self inclusion’ and ‘ownership’ of the agenda are key elements within this re-structured approach. Using the Foucauldian notion of governmentality, it is argued that this represents a technology of government which is likely to have unintended consequences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armstrong, H. (1999), ‘The Key Themes of Democratic Renewal’ , Local Government Studies, Vol 25, No 4, pp. 19-25 .
2.
Barnes, M. and Prior, D. (2000), Private lives as Public Policy, ( Birmingham: Venture Press) .
3.
Barnett, N. and Wetherly, P. (2003), ‘The concept of community in Third Way theory and New Labour politics- a review and critique’ , Paper presented to the ‘Meanings of community’ conference, Palacky University, Olmouc, Czech Republic, 6-11July, 2003.
4.
Barnett, N. (1999), ‘Old Times/New Times-Managerial Excellence and Best Value’ , Paper presented to the British Academy of Management Annual Conference, University of Manchester, 1-3September, 1999.
5.
Bartlett, D. , Corrigan, P. , Dibben, P. , Franklin, S.Joyce, P. and Rose, A. (1999), ‘Preparing for Best Value’ , Local Government Studies, Vol 25, No 2, Summer pp. 102-118 .
6.
Bell, A. and Broadbent, J. (2002), ‘Best Value and the control of Local Government: challenges and contradictions’, Public Money and Management, April-June, pp.9-16.
7.
Blair, T. (1998), Leading the Way: A new Vision for Local Government, ( London: I.P.P.R .)
8.
Brooks, J. (2000), ‘Labour's modernization of Local Government’ , Public Administration, Vol 78, No 3, pp. 593-612 .
9.
Cawson, A. and Saunders, P. (1983) ‘Corporatism, competitive politics and class struggle’, in King, R. (ed.), Capital and Politics, ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul ).
10.
Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997), The managerial state: power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare, ( London: MacMillan ).
11.
Clarke, J. and Glendinning, C. (2002), ‘Partnership and the remaking of welfare governance’, in Glendinning, C. , Powell, M. and Rummery, K. (eds), Partnerships, New Labour and the governance of welfare, ( Bristol: Policy Press ).
12.
Clegg, S. (1989), Frameworks of Power, ( London: Sage ).
13.
Cochrane, A. (1993), Whatever Happened to Local Government?, ( Buckingham: Open University Press ).
14.
Cochrane, A. (2000), ‘Local Government: Managerialism and Modernization’, in Clarke, J. , Gerwitz, S. and McLaughlin, E. (eds), New Managerialism, New Welfare?, ( London: Sage ).
15.
Cockburn, C. (1977), The Local State: Management of Cities and People, ( London: Pluto ).
16.
Dean, M. (1999), Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society, ( London: Sage ).
17.
DETR (1998), Modern Local Government: In touch with the People, ( London: DETR ).
18.
DLTR (2001), Strong local leadership – Quality public services, ( London: DLTR TSO ).
19.
duGay, P. (1993), ‘The Enterprising Subjects of “Excellence”’, in Child, J. , Crozier, M. and Mayntz, R. et. al., Societal Change Between and Organization, ( Avebury: Aldershot ).
20.
Dunleavy, P. (1980), Urban political analysis: the politics of collective consumption, ( London: MacMillan ).
21.
Finlayson, A. (1999), ‘Third Way Theory’, The Political Quarterly, July-Sept., pp.271-279.
22.
Fitzpatrick, T. (1999), ‘The rise of market collectivism’, Social Policy Review, No 10.
23.
Fournier, V. (1998), ‘Stories of Development and Exploitation: Militant Voices in an Enterprise Culture’ , Organization, Vol 5, No 1, pp. 55-80 .
24.
Giddens, A. (1997), The Consequences of Modernity, ( Cambridge: Polity ).
25.
Giddens, A. (1999), The Third Way: the Renewal of Social Democracy, ( Malden, Mass: Polity ).
26.
Goodwin, M. (1989), ‘The Politics of Locality’ in Cochrane, A. and Anderson, J. , Politics in Transition, ( London: Sage ).
27.
Goodwin, M. et. al. (1993), ‘Regulation Theory, the local state, and the transition of local politics’ , Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol 11, Pt 1, pp. 67-88 .
28.
Hartley, J. and Allison, M. (2002), ‘Good, Better, Best? Inter-organizational learning in a network of local authorities’ , Public Management Review, Vol 4, No 1, pp. 101-118 .
29.
Heron, E. and Dwyer, P. (1999), ‘Doing The Right Thing: Labour's Attempt to Forge a New Welfare Deal Between the Individual and the State’ , Social Policy and Administration, Vol 33, No 1, pp. 91-104 .
30.
Hodgson, D. (2001), ‘Empowering Customers Through Education or Governing Without Government?’, in Sturdy, A. , Grugulis, I. and Willmott, H. (eds), Customer Service Empowerment and Entrapment, ( Palgrave, Basingstoke ).
31.
Hoggett, P. (1996), ‘New modes of control in the Public service’ , Public Administration, Vol 74, Spring, pp. 9-32 .
32.
Improvement and Development Agency (2001, 3rd edition), Benchmark of the ‘Ideal’ Local Authority, ( Luton: IDEA ).
33.
Isin, E.F. (2000), ‘Governing cities without government’, in Isin, E.F. , Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City, ( London: Routledge ).
34.
Jessop, B. (1990), State theory: putting the state in its place, ( Cambridge: Polity Press ).
35.
Jordan, B. (1998), The New Politics of Welfare, ( London: Sage ).
36.
Jordan, B. (1999), ‘New Labour, New Community?’ , Imprints, Vol 3, No 2, pp. 113-131 .
37.
Knights, D. and Vurdubakis, T. (1994), ‘Foucault, Power, Resistance and All that’ in Jermier, J. , Knights, D. and Nord, W.R. , Resistance and Power in Organizations, ( London: Routledge ).
38.
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, ( London: Verso ).
39.
Le Grand, J. (1998), ‘The Third Way begins with CORA’, New Statesman, 6th March pp.26-27.
40.
Ling, T. (2000), ‘Unpacking Partnership: The Case of Health Care’, in Clarke, J. , Gerwitz, S. and McLaughlin, E. (eds), New Managerialism, New Welfare?, ( London: Sage ).
41.
Lister, R. (1998), ‘From equality to social exclusion: New Labour and the welfare state’ , Critical Social Policy, Vol 18, pp. 215-225 .
42.
Lowndes, V. (2002), ‘Between Rhetoric and Reality: Does the White Paper Reverse the Centralising Trend in Britain?’ , Local Government Studies, Vol 28, No 3, pp. 135-147 .
43.
MacGregor, S. (2003), ‘Social Exclusion’ in Ellison, N. and Pierson, C. (eds), Developments in British Social Policy 2, ( Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan ).
44.
Maille, S. and Hoggett, P. (2001), ‘Best Value and the politics of pragmatism’ , Policy and Politics Vol 29, No 4, pp. 510-519 .
45.
Martin S. (2002), ‘The Modernization of UK Local Government’ , Public Management Review, Vol 4, No 3, pp. 291-307 .
46.
Massey, D. (1995), Spatial divisions of labour: social structures and the geography of production, ( London: MacMillan ).
47.
Newman, J. (2001), Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society, ( London: Sage ).
48.
Painter, J. and Goodwin, M. (1995), ‘Local governance and concrete research: investigating the uneven development of regulation’ , Economy and Society, Vol 24, No 3, pp. 334-356 .
49.
Rose, N. (1993), ‘Government Authority and Expertise in Advanced Liberalism’ , Economy and Society, Vol 22, Pt 3, pp. 283-299 .
50.
Rose, N. (1996), ‘The death of the social: Re-figuring the territory of government’ , Economy and Society, Vol 25, No 3, pp. 327-356 .
51.
Rose, N. (1999), ‘Inventiveness in politics’ , Economy and Society, Vol 28, pp. 467-490 .
52.
Rustin, M. (1998), ‘The New Labour Project’ , Soundings, 8, Spring.
53.
Stoker, G. (1999), ‘Introduction: The Unintended Costs and Benefits of New Management Reform for British Local Government’, in Stoker, G. (ed.), The New Management of British Local Governance, ( Basingstoke: MacMillan ).
54.
Stoker, G. and Mossberger, K. (1995), ‘The Post-Fordist local state: The dynamics of its development’, in Stewart, J. and Stoker, G. (eds), Local Government in the 1990s, ( London: MacMillan ).
55.
Walters, W. (1997), ‘The active society: new designs for social policy’ , Policy and Politics, Vol 25, No 3, pp. 221-233 .
56.
Wilson, D. (2001), ‘Local Government: Balancing Diversity and Uniformity’Parliamentary Affairs, 54, pp. 289-307 .
