Modernising Regulation or Regulating Modernisation? The Public,Private and Voluntary Interface in Adult Social Care

Abstract

Regulation is a very significant form of managing public services in Britain, as central government increasingly relies upon regulatory agencies and mechanisms to measure and improve the performance of agencies delivering public services. The present Labour Government's modernisation strategy has strengthened the key role of state-sponsored regulation of public services, including social care. A key plank to its modernisation agenda facing public services, and underpinned by Third Way thinking, is a move towards partnerships and collaborative governance embracing public, private and voluntary sector bodies in the delivery of public services. In the case of adult social care, this push furthers moves towards a mixed economy of welfare, where ideological ‘state-versus-market’ arguments take backstage to managerialist discussions about ‘what works’. Public service regulation represents a ‘third way’ between state and market provision of public services. Our preliminary research findings support the view that regulation of adult social care, though not new nor without its tensions, has been and is being transformed as New Labour's modernisation programme of reforming public services increasingly takes hold, and that the transformed adult social care regulatory regime is consistent with and informed by Third Way thinking.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkinson, R. , and Cope, S. (1994), ‘Changing styles of governance since 1979’, in Savage, S.P. , Atkinson, R. , and Robins, L. (eds), Public Policy in Britain, ( Basingstoke: Macmillan ), pp.31-52.

Baldwin, R. , and Cave, M. (1999), Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice, ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).

Ball, A. , Broadbent, J. , and Moore, C. (2002), ‘Best Value and the control of local government: challenges and contradictions’ , Public Money & Management, Vol 22, No 2, pp. 9-16 .

Beetham, D. , Byrne, D. , Ngan, P. , and Weir, S. (2002), Democracy under Blair: A Democratic Audit of the United Kingdom, ( London: Politicos ).

Blair, T. (1998), The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century, ( London: Fabian Society ).

Burch, M. , and Holliday, I. (2000), ‘New Labour and the machinery of government’, in Coates, D. , and Lawler, P. (eds), New Labour in Power, ( Manchester: Manchester University Press ).

Cabinet Office (1999), Modernising Government, (Cm.4310), ( London: HMSO ).

Clarke, J. , and Newman, J. (1997), The Managerial State, ( London: Sage ).

Cope, S. , and Atkinson, R. (1994), ‘The structures of governance in Britain’, in Savage, S.P. , Atkinson, R. , and Robins, L. (eds), Public Policy in Britain, ( Basingstoke: Macmillan ), pp.15-30.

10.

Cope, S. , and Goodship, J. (1999), Regulating collaborative government: towards joined-up government?’ , Public Policy and Administration, Vol 14, No 2, pp. 3-16 .

11.

Cope, S. , and Goodship, J. (2002), ‘The Audit Commission and public services: delivering for whom?’ , Public Money & Management, Vol 22, No 4. pp. 25-32 .

12.

Cope, S. , Goodship, J. , and Holloway, D. (2003), ‘Regulating the new governance: the case of further education’ , Journal of Vocational Education & Training, Vol 55, No 2, pp. 183-207 .

13.

Coxall, B. , Robins, L. , and Leach, R. (eds) (2003), Contemporary British Politics, ( Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan ).

14.

Cutler, T. , and Waine, B. (2003), ‘Advancing public accountability? The social services ‘star’ ratings’, Public Money & Management, pp.125-128.

15.

Department of Health (1998), Modernising Social Services: Promoting Independence, Improving Protection, Raising Standards, (Cm.4169), ( London: HMSO ).

16.

Evans, N. (1994), “The poisoned chalice?” Personal social services policy’, in Savage, S.P. , Atkinson, R. , and Robins, L. (eds), Public Policy in Britain, ( Basingstoke: Macmillan ), pp.221-240.

17.

Giddens, A. (1998), The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, ( Cambridge: Polity Press ).

18.

Hale, S. , Leggett, W. , and Martell, L. (2004), The Third Way and beyond, ( Manchester: Manchester University Press ).

19.

Hood, C. , James, O. , Jones, G. , Scott, C. , and Travers, T. (1998), ‘Regulation inside government: where new public management meets the audit explosion’ , Public Money & Management, Vol 18, No 2.

20.

Hood, C. , Scott, C. , James, O. , Jones, G. , and Travers, T. (1999), Regulation Inside Government: Wastewatchers, Quality Police, and Sleaze-Busters, ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).

21.

Hughes, G. , Mears, R. , and Winch, C. (1997), ‘An inspector calls? Regulation and accountability in three public services’ , Policy & Politics, Vol 25, No 3, pp. 299-314 .

22.

Humphrey, J.C. (2003), ‘New Labour and the regulatory reform of social care’ , Critical Social Policy, Vol 23, No 1, pp. 5-24 .

23.

Jones, G. , and Stewart, J. (2002), ‘Central-local relations since the Layfield Report’ , Local Government Studies, Vol 28, No 3, pp. 7-28 .

24.

Jordan, B. (2000), Social Work and the Third Way, ( London: Sage ).

25.

Majone, G. (ed.) (1990), Deregulation or Re-Regulation? Regulatory Reform in Europe and the United States, ( London: Pinter ).

26.

Majone, G. (1994), ‘The rise of the regulatory state in Europe’ , West European Politics, Vol 17, No 3.

27.

Majone, G. (1996a), ‘Regulation and its modes: the European experience’ , International Journal of Public Administration, Vol 19, No 9.

28.

Majone, G. (ed.) (1996b), Regulating Europe, ( London: Routledge ).

29.

Majone, G. (1996c),’Regulation and its modes’, in Majone, G. (ed.), Regulating Europe, ( London: Routledge ).

30.

Mandelson, P. , and Liddle, R. (1996), The Blair Revolution: Can New Labour Deliver?, ( London: Faber & Faber ).

31.

Midwinter, A. , and McGarvey, N. (2001), ‘In search of the regulatory state: evidence from Scotland’ , Public Administration, Vol 79, No 4, pp. 825-849 .

32.

Newman, J. (2001), Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society, ( London: Sage ).

33.

Newman, J. , Barnes, M. , Sullivan, H. , and Knops, A. (2004), ‘Public participation and collaborative governance’ , Journal of Social Policy, Vol 33, No 2, pp. 203-223 .

34.

Osborne, D. , and Gaebler, T. (1992), Reinventing Government, ( Reading: Addison-Wesley ).

35.

Powell, M. (ed.) (1999), New Labour, New Welfare State? The ‘Third Way’ in British Social Policy, ( Bristol: The Policy Press ).

36.

Power, M. (1997), The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).

37.

Richards, D. , and Smith, M. (2001), ‘New Labour, the constitution and reforming the state’, in Ludlam, S. , and Smith, M. (eds), New Labour in Government, ( London: Macmillan ), pp.145-166.

38.

Rouse, G. , and Smith, G. (1999), ‘Accountability’, in Powell, M. (ed.), New Labour, New Welfare State? The ‘Third Way’ in British Social Policy, ( Bristol: The Policy Press ).

39.

Sanderson, I. (2001), ‘Performance management, evaluation and learning in “modern” local government’ , Public Administration, Vol 79, No 2, pp. 297-313 .

40.

Selznick, P. (1985), ‘Focusing organizational research on regulation’, in Noll, R.G. (ed.), Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, ( Berkeley: University of California Press ).

41.

Sullivan, H. (2001), ‘Modernisation, democratisation and community governance’ , Local Government Studies, Vol 27, No 3, pp. 1-24 .

42.

Williamson, P. (1993), ‘Good for your health: the New Right and health reform’, in Jordan, G. , and Ashford, N. (eds), Public Policy and the Impact of the New Right, ( London: Pinter ).

43.

Wilson, D. (2003), ‘Unravelling control freakery: redefining central-local government relations’ , The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol 5, No 3.