Overview and Scrutiny as a Dialogue of Accountability for Democratic Local Government

Abstract

The Local Government Act 2000 established a new set of political arrangements across England and Wales which included, for the first time, a distinct, separate overview and scrutiny function with the statutory duty to 'hold the executive to account'. This paper will explore the potential and limits of the overview and scrutiny function as a mechanism for public accountability in local government. It will be argued that effective processes of public scrutiny (as mechanisms for public accountability) are an essential component of good local governance with the potential to reconnect local citizens and the state within modernised forms of representative democracy. Reflecting current policy debates, it will be suggested that the future role of the local authority, as the democratically elected local tier of government, should be to create the conditions for public accountability in local governance and support officers and members engaged in public scrutiny.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bouckaert, G. and van Dooren, W. (2003), 'Performance Measurement and Management', in T. Bovaird , and E. Loffler (eds), Public Management and Governance, (London: Routledge).

Day, P. and Klein (1987), Accountabilities: Five Public Services, (London: Tavistock).

Centre for Public Scrutiny (2003), Good Scrutiny Guide (London: Centre for Public Scrutiny).

Centre for Public Scrutiny (2005a), Tackling the democratic deficit in health: an introduction to the power of local authority health scrutiny, (London: The Centre for Public Scrutiny).

Centre for Public Scrutiny (2005b), Process, progress and making it work: health overview and scrutiny in England , (London: Centre for Public Scrutiny ).

Centre for Public Scrutiny (2005c), Practice, progress and potential, (London: Centre for Public Scrutiny).

Department of Health (2004), Choosing Health: making healthy choices easier, (London : Department of Health).

Hirst, P. (1994), Associative Democracy, (Cambridge : Polity Press).

Martin, J. (2004), Public Accountability in Practice - The Need for Public Scrutiny, (London: Public Management and Policy Association).

10.

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2001), Guidance to English Local Authorities, (London: ODPM).

11.

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005a), Vibrant Local Leadership, (London: DPM).

12.

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005b), Local Strategic Partnerships: Shaping their future, (London : ODPM).

13.

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister/HM Treasury ( 2005), Securing better outcomes: developing a new performance framework, (London: ODPM).

14.

Ranson, S. (2003), 'Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance', Journal of Education Policy, Vol 18, No 5, pp.459-480.

15.

Rouse and Smith (1999), 'Accountability', in M. Powell (ed.), New Labour New Welfare State, (Bristol: Policy Press).

16.

Sandford, M. and Maer, L. (2004), Old Habits Die Hard? Overview and Scrutiny in English Local Authorities, (London: The Constitution Unit, University College London).

17.

Snape, S. et al. (2002), The Development of Overview and Scrutiny in Local Government, (London: ODPM ).

18.

Snape, S. and Taylor, F. (2001), A Hard Nut to Crack? Making Overview and Scrutiny Work, Paper in the LGA Designing Governance: Issues for Modernisation series , (London: LGA).

19.

Stewart, J. (1996), 'Democracy and Local Government', in P. Hirst and S. Khilnani (eds), Reinventing Democracy, (Oxford : The Political Quarterly).

20.

Thomas, H. and Martin, J. (1996), Managing Resources for School Improvement, (London: Routledge).

21.

Woolas, P. (2005), 'Councils promised power over other providers ', Public Finance, 9 December 2005.