The Impact of Local Authority Procurement on Local Economies

Abstract

Public procurement has a significant impact on economic development in regions and localities. Previous research in the UK has focused on variations in government spending across regions, the effects of competitive tendering processes and EU State Aid rules on regional economies. Empirical studies of procurement at the level of local authorities have received less attention. Increasing pressure to be ‘efficient and effective’ in use of public resources can contradict the need to support local communities, particularly through a period of economic downturn. Until recently, there has been a paucity of relevant data at a local level to examine the impacts of procurement. This paper analyses the combined patterns of spend of eight Local Authorities in the County of Cumbria in North West England. The characteristics of the supply base are investigated using a two-stage survey of businesses that secure local authority contracts. Results show the characteristics of suppliers and their level of dependency on local authority contracts. Managers’ evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of contracting with the public sector are also analysed. The findings suggest that many small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Cumbria rely upon local authority contracts for business stability. The interviews confirm the vulnerability of SMEs to the current trend towards more formal approaches to public procurement and the use of a narrow definition of ‘value for money’. The paper concludes by considering the implications of the findings for the extent to which local authorities have retained a capacity to act to support local economic development.

Keywords

Cumbria local authorities local economy new public sector management public procurement sustainable procurement value for money

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett P. ( 2006) ‘Competing for the Island Lifeline: European Law, State Aid and Regional Public Services’. Regional Studies 40(8): 953-966.

Byatt I. ( 2001) Delivering Better Services for Citizens: A Review of Local Government Procurement in England. London: The Stationery Office.

Caldwell N. , Walker H. , Harland C. , Knight L. , Zheng J. , and Waleley T. ( 2005) ‘Promoting Competitive Markets: The Role of Public Procurement’. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 11: 242-251.

Commission of European Communities (2008) Public Procurement: Updated Lists of Contracting Authority Give Better Access to Public Contracts for Businesses. Press release - Brussels , 15 December 2008. Retrieved 19 July 2009 from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/08/1971&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN.

Czepiel JA ( 1990) ‘Service Encounters and Service Relationships, Implications for Research’. Journal of Business Research 20: 13-21.

Connolly S. ( 2004) ‘‘‘Mainstreaming’’ and the Mapping of Mainstream Resources - Identifying the Challenges’. Business Review North East 16(1): 18-25.

Cred (2006) Mapping Resources in Cumbria Final report to Cumbria Vision. Carlisle, UK: Centre for Regional Economic Development, University of Cumbria.

Erridge A. ( 2007) ‘Public Procurement, Public Value and the Northern Ireland Unemployment Pilot Project’, Public Administration 85(4): 1024-1043.

Erridge A. , Nondi R. ( 1994) ‘Public Procurement, Competition and Partnership’ . Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 1(3): 169-179.

10.

Fothergill S. ( 2006) ‘EU State Aid Rules: How the European Union is Setting the Framework for Members States’ own Regional Policies’. Regional Studies Association International Conference - Shaping EU Regional Policy: Economic, Social and Political Pressures. Leuven, Belgium, 8-9 June 2006.

11.

Gershon P. ( 1999) ‘Review of Civil Procurement in Central Government’ . Sir Peter Gershon CBE, April 1999. Retrieved 13 July 2009 from http://archive.treasury.gov.uk/docs/1999/pgfinalr.html .

12.

Gershon P. ( 2004) Releasing Resources to the Front Line. Independent Review of Public Sector Efficiency, Sir Peter Gershon CBE July 2004. Retrieved 24 July 2009 from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/efficiency_review120704.pdf .

13.

Glynn JJ , Murphy M. ( 1996) ‘Public Management: Failing Accountabilities and Failing Performance review’. Interna tional Journal of Public Sector Management 9(5/6): 125-137.

14.

HM Treasury (2005) Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2005. London: HM Treasury.

15.

HM Treasury (2007) Transforming Public Procurement. London: HM Treasury .

16.

Loader K. ( 2007) ‘The Challenge of Competitive Procurement: Value for Money versus Small Business Support’. Public Money & Management November: 307-314.

17.

Mackay RR ( 2001) ‘Regional Taxing and Spending: The Search for Balance’ . Regional Studies 35(6): 563-75.

18.

Mackay RR ( 2003) ‘Twenty-five Years of Regional Development’ . Regional Studies 37(3): 303-317.

19.

McLean I. ( 2003) Identifying the Flow of Domestic and European Expenditure into the English Regions. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Retrieved 23 July 2009 from http://www.local.odpm.gov.uk/research/idenrprt.pdf .

20.

McCrudden C. ( 2004) ‘Using Public Procurement to Achieve Social Outcomes’ . National Resources Forum 28: 257-267.

21.

Morgan K. ( 2008) ‘Greening the Realm: Sustainable Food Chains and the Public Plate’. Regional Studies 42(9): 1237-1250.

22.

Office for Fair Trade (2004) Assessing the Impact of Public Sector Procurement on Competition [document reference: OFT742b]. London: Office for Fair Trade.

23.

Osborne S. ( 2002) Public Management: Critical Perspectives. London: Routledge.

24.

Pinch P. , Philip L. , and Patterson A. ( 2006) ‘Public Sector Restructuring and Regional Development: The Impact of Compulsory Competitive Tendering in the UK’. Regional Studies 34(3): 265-275.

25.

Reimer S. ( 1999) ‘Contract Service Firms in Local Authorities: Evolving Geographies of Activity’. Regional Studies 33(2): 121-130.

26.

Skelcher C. , Mathur N. and Smith M. ( 2003) ‘Partnership Discourse and the Democratic Governance of Local Communities: A Preliminary Empirical Assessment’. Conference on Democratic Network - Centre for Democratic Network Governance, Copenhagen, Denmark, 22-23 May 2003.