Abstract Governments face many challenges in maintaining effective policymaking capacity as their governance activities alter and change. The emergence of a gap between government aspirations and street-level conditions for policy workers can lead to an increased likelihood of poor policy outcomes. Maintaining strong policy capacity in such public services is a critical factor in avoiding various kinds of policy failures. Very little large-scale empirical research has been dedicated to the study of contemporary policy work, however, making it difficult to evaluate competing claims about the impact of changing conditions on practices of policy analysis. Using data derived from three large-scale surveys of Canadian policy analysts conducted during 2007 to 2008, this article develops and tests several key hypotheses about contemporary policy work and its relationship to policy analytical capacity.
Alan Cairns ( 1977) The Governments and Societies of Canadian Federalism. Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol.X, No.4, pp.695-725.
2.
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) Developing Policy Advice.Auditor-General Audit Report No. 21 2001-2002 Performance Audit. Canberra, ACT: Australian National Audit Office.
3.
Anderson G. ( 1996) The New Focus on the Policy Capacity of the Federal Government . Canadian Public Administration39(4): 469-488.
4.
Aucoin P. and Bakvis H. ( 2005) Public Service Reform and Policy Capacity: Recruiting and Retaining the Best and the Brightest. in Painter M and Pierre J (eds) Challenges to State Policy Capacity: Global Trends and Comparative Perspectives . London: Palgrave Macmillan, 185-204.
5.
Bakvis H. ( 2000) Rebuilding Policy Capacity in the Era of the Fiscal Dividend: A Report from Canada. Governance13(1): 71-103.
6.
Christensen R. and Gazley B. ( 2008) Capacity for Public Administration: Analysis of Meaning and Measurement. Public Administration and Development28: 265-279.
7.
Colebatch HK and Radin BA ( 2006) Mapping the Work of Policy. in Colebatch HK (ed) The Work of Policy: An International Survey . New York: Rowman and Littlefield , 217-226.
8.
Côté A., Baird K. and Green I. ( 2007) A Vital National Institution: What a Cross-section of Canadians Think about the Prospects for Canada’s Public Service in the 21st Century. Ottawa, ON: Public Policy Forum.
9.
Cummings S. and Nørgaard O. ( 2004) Conceptualizing State Capacity: Comparing Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Political Studies52(4): 685-708.
10.
de Bruijn H. and Porter AL ( 2004) The Education of a Technology Policy Analyst - to Process Management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management16(2): 261-274.
11.
Dluhy M. ( 1981) Policy Advice-givers: Advocates? Technicians? Or Pragmatists? in Tropman JE, Dluhy M and Lind RM (eds) New Strategic Perspectives on Social Policy. New York: Pergamon Press, 202-216.
12.
Durning D. and Osuna W. ( 1994) Policy Analysts’ Roles and Value Orientations: An Empirical Investigation Using Q Methodology. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management13(4): 629-657.
13.
Edwards L.(2009) Testing the Discourse of Declining Policy Capacity: Rail Policy and the Department of Transport. Australian Journal of Public Administration68(3): 288-302.
14.
Fellegi I. ( 1996) Strengthening Our Policy Capacity. Ottawa, ON: Deputy Ministers Task Forces.
15.
Geva-May I. and Maslove A. ( 2006) Canadian Public Policy Analysis and Public Policy Programs: A Comparative Perspective. Journal of Public Affairs Education12(4): 413-438.
16.
Geva-May I. and Maslove A. ( 2007) In between Trends: Developments of Public Policy Analysis and Policy Analysis Instruction in Canada, the United States and the European Union. in Dobuzinskis L, Howlett M and Laycock D (eds) Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 186-216.
17.
Goetz KH and Wollmann H. ( 2001) Governmentalizing Central Executives in Post-communist Europe: A Four-country Comparison. Journal of European Public Policy8(6): 864-887.
18.
Goldsmith S. and Eggers WD ( 2004) Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
19.
Halligan J. ( 1995) Policy Advice and the Public Sector. in Peters BG and Savoie DT (eds) Governance in a Changing Environment. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press , 138-172.
20.
Harrow J. ( 2001) ‘Capacity Building’ as a Public Management Goal: Myth, Magic of the Main Chance. Public Management Review3(2): 209-230.
21.
Hayduk LA ( 1987) Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
Hird JA ( 2005) Power, Knowledge and Politics: Policy Analysis in the States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
23.
Honadle B. ( 1981) A Capacity Building Framework: A Search for Concept and Purpose. Public Administration Review41(5): 575-580.
24.
Hoppe R. ( 1999) Policy Analysis, Science and Politics: From ‘Speaking Truth to Power’ to ‘Making Sense Together’. Science and Public Policy26(3): 201-210.
25.
Hoppe R. and Jeliazkova M. ( 2006) How Policy Workers Define Their Job: A Netherlands Case Study. in Colebatch HK (ed) The Work of Policy: An International Survey. New York: Rowan and Littlefield, 35-60.
26.
Howlett M. ( 2009a) Policy Advice in Multi-level Governance Systems: Sub-national Policy Analysts and Analysis. International Review of Public Administration13(3): 1-16.
27.
Howlett M. ( 2009b) Policy Analytical Capacity and Evidence-based Policymaking: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration52(2): 153-175.
28.
Howlett M. and Lindquist E. ( 2004) Policy Analysis and Governance: Analytical and Policy Styles in Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis6(3): 225-249.
29.
Jenkins-Smith H. ( 1982) Professional Roles of Policy Analysts. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management2(11): 88-100.
30.
Laumann, Edward O and David Knoke ( 1987) The Organizational State. Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison/Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
31.
Kline R. ( 2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press.
32.
Koliba C. and Gajda R.(2009) ‘Communities of Practice’ as an Analytical Construct: Implications for Theory and Practice. International Journal of Public Administration32: 97-135.
33.
Kothari A., MacLean L and Edwards N (2009) Increasing Capacity for Knowledge Translation: Understanding how Some Researchers Engage Policy Makers. Evidence & Policy5(1): 33-51.
34.
Lindquist EA ( 1992) Public Managers and Policy Communities: Learning to Meet New Challenges. Canadian Public Administration35(2): 127-159.
35.
Lipsky M. ( 1980) Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of Individuals in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
36.
Lynch K. ( 2008) The Public Service of Canada: Too Many Misperceptions. Remarks by Kevin G. Lynch, Clerk of the Privy Council, Secretary to the Cabinet and Head of the Public Service, Vancouver, Canada, 18 February. Available at http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/index.asp?lang¼eng&Page¼clerk-greffier&Sub¼archives&Doc¼20080218-eng.htm.
37.
McArthur D. ( 2007) Policy Analysis in Provincial Governments in Canada: From PPBS to Network Management. in Dobuzinskis L, Howlett M and Laycock D (eds) Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 132-145.
38.
Mayer I., Bots P. and van Daalen E. ( 2004) Perspectives on Policy Analysis: A Framework for Understanding and Design. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management4(1): 169-191.
39.
Meltsner AJ ( 1976) Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
Nicholson J. ( 1997) Monitoring the Efficiency, Quality, and Effectiveness of Policy Advice to Government. in Maybe J and Zapico-Goni E (eds) Monitoring Performance in the Public Sector: Future Directions from International Experience. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 237-252.
41.
O’Connor A., Roos G. and Vickers-Willis T. ( 2007) Evaluating an Australian Public Policy Organization’s Innovation Capacity. European Journal of Innovation Management10(4): 532-558.
42.
Page EC and Jenkins B. ( 2005) Policy Bureaucracy: Governing with a Cast of Thousands . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
43.
Painter M. and Pierre J. ( 2005) Unpacking Policy Capacity: Issues and Themes. in Painter M and Pierre J (eds) Challenges to State Policy Capacity: Global Trends and Comparative Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
Pal L. ( 2001) Beyond Policy Analysis: Public Issue Management in Turbulent Times, 2nd edn. Toronto, ON: Nelson.
45.
Parsons W. ( 2004) Not Just Steering but Weaving: Relevant Knowledge and the Craft of Building Policy Capacity and Coherence. Australian Journal of Public Administration63(1): 43-57.
46.
Peters G. ( 1996) The Policy Capacity of Government, Canadian Centre for Management Development, Research Paper No. 18.
47.
Prince M. ( 2007) Soft Craft, Hard Choices, Altered Context: Reflections on 25 Years of Policy Advice in Canada. in Dobuzinskis L, Howlett M and Laycock D (eds) Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 219-237.
48.
Prince M. and Chenier J. ( 1980) The Rise and Fall of Policy Planning and Research Units . Canadian Public Administration23(4): 519-541.
49.
Radin BA ( 2000) Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
50.
Rasmussen K. ( 1999) Policy Capacity in Saskatchewan: Strengthening the Equilibrium . Canadian Public Administration42(3): 331-338.
51.
Riddell N. ( 2007) Policy Research Capacity in the Federal Government. Ottawa, ON: Policy Research Initiative.
52.
Rieper O and Toulemonde J (eds) (1997) Politics and Practices of Intergovernmental Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
53.
Savoie D. ( 2003a) Strengthening the Policy Capacity of Government. Report to the Panel on the Role of Government. ResearchPaperSeries, Vol. 1, 239-290.
54.
Savoie D. ( 2003b) Breaking the Bargain: Public Servants, Ministers and Parliament. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
55.
Segsworth R. and Poel D. ( 1997) Two Cases of Intergovernmental Evaluation in Canada: ‘Parallel Play’ and Cooperation without Policy Consequences. in Rieper O and Toulemonde J (eds) Politics and Practices of Intergovernmental Evaluation . New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 75-98.
56.
State Services Commission (1997) Essential Ingredients: Improving the Quality of Policy Advice. Wellington: New Zealand State Services Commission.
57.
Uhr J. ( 1996) Testing the Policy Capacities of Budgetary Agencies: Lessons from Finance. Australian Journal of Public Administration55(4): 124-134.
58.
Voyer J. ( 2007) Policy Analysis in the Federal Government: Building the Forward-looking Policy Research Capacity. in Dobuzinskis L, Howlett M and Laycock D (eds) Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 123-131.
59.
Waller M. ( 1992) Evaluating Policy Advice. Australian Journal of Public Administration51(4): 440-446.
60.
Weber E. and Khademian A. ( 2008) Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings. Public Administration Review68(2): 334-349.
61.
Weiss L. ( 1998) The Myth of the Powerless State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
62.
Weller P. and Stevens B. ( 1998) Evaluating Policy Advice: The Australian Experience. Public Administration76(Autumn)-579-589.
63.
Wellstead A., Stedman R., Joshi S. and Lindquist E. ( 2007) Beyond the national capital region: Federal regional policy capacity. Report prepared for the Treasury Board Secretariat of CanadaOttawa, Ont.
64.
Wellstead A., Stedman R and Lindquist E (2009) The Nature of Regional Policy Work in Canada’s Federal Public Service. Canadian Political Science Review3(1): 34-56.
65.
Wildavsky AB ( 1979) Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis . Boston, MA: Little-Brown.
66.
Zafonte M. and Sabatier P. ( 1998) Shared Beliefs and Imposed Interdependencies as Determinants of Ally Networks in Overlapping Subsystems. Journal of Theoretical Politics. vol. 10 no. 4473-505.
