Abstract
Collaboration is increasingly perceived as essential for digital transformation in the public sector. Transforming services and internal operations through the use of information and communication technologies frequently requires the engagement of multiple stakeholders beyond government agencies. This is particularly important in the specific case of smart city initiatives, which intend to leverage technologies to address complex socio-economic and sustainability challenges in local jurisdictions. In addition, emergent research asserts that community organizations such as public libraries can be strategic partners in these multi-actor efforts but does not adequately assess the determinants of these collaborations for developing smart cities, which may result in significant digital transformation at the local level. Based on public management literature on collaboration, this article contributes to digital transformation research by quantitively testing the antecedents of existing collaborations between public libraries and other stakeholders to develop smart cities. Overall, our findings suggest that leadership, preexisting relationships, and agreement on initial aims significantly impact the extent and effectiveness of public libraries' collaborations in developing smart cities.
Introduction
With the advancement of technology, changes in public management practices, and citizen expectations, digital transformation has emerged as a “holistic effort to revise the core processes and services of government beyond digitization and digitalization efforts” that “evolves along a continuum of transition from analog to digital to a full stack review of policies, current processes, and user needs and results in a complete revision of the existing and the creation of new digital services” (Mergel et al., 2019: 12).
Digital transformation encompasses a shift to an innovative, dynamic government and the reinvention of public services to meet the ever-changing needs of diverse stakeholders, who are placed at the center of this development (Mergel et al., 2018; Vial, 2019). This transition is realized through the use of digital technologies and by engaging in new ways of working with government and non-government actors to co-design the said transformation and co-produce government services, altering how value is created and delivered (Liva et al., 2020; Luna-Reyes and Gil-García, 2014; Scupola and Mergel, 2022). Digital transformation can also help tackle complex societal problems and socio-economic issues intensified by the evolving demands of citizens and nascent sustainability challenges (Pereira et al., 2020), which particularly impact cities and local governments (Batty et al., 2012; Caragliu et al., 2011; Pardo et al., 2021; Soe et al., 2022).
In the last years, the concept of “smart city” has emerged as a strategy for digital transformation that uses digital technologies to change how local governments operate and collaborate to mitigate urban problems (Barcevičius et al., 2019; Meijer, 2018; Nam and Pardo, 2011a). Aware of different definitions, this study identifies smart cities as cities that, through technological and human development, seek to increase the efficiency of urban operations, enhance the quality of life, and foster economic development while maintaining environmental sustainability (Gascó-Hernández, 2016). Smart city initiatives contribute to digital transformation in local governments through multi-actor collaborations and leveraging technological innovations to advance collaborative forms of governance (Bousdekis and Kardaras, 2020; Meijer, 2015; Meijer and Rodríguez Bolívar, 2016; Mergel et al., 2019). This engagement and empowerment of stakeholders enable them to contribute to developing smart cities (Chourabi et al., 2012; Gascó-Hernández, 2018; Pereira et al., 2019, 2020). In the effort to build a comprehensive, collaborative model for developing smart cities, research often recognizes tech companies, governments, and universities as the main stakeholders (Alawadhi et al., 2012; Eger, 2005; Ruhlandt, 2018) while paying less attention to community organizations, such as public libraries, that could also play a role in building a smart city (Leorke and Wyatt, 2019; Luterek, 2018; Mora et al., 2019b).
Emerging research suggests that public libraries have the potential to become strategic partners in the development of smart cities through new collaborations with local governments and other stakeholders. Public libraries can contribute to these partnerships by developing smart citizens through digital literacy programs, facilitating and enabling citizen engagement with local issues, and offering resources and community spaces for innovation and technology co-production (Gascó-Hernández et al., 2022a). Existing studies, however, do not explore in-depth how public libraries and local governments collaborate for smart city development (Burke et al., 2014; Leorke and Wyatt, 2019; Sayogo et al., 2016). More specifically, the determinants of these collaborations, which are particularly important since these efforts are frequently part of digital transformation processes at the local level, remain understudied. Therefore, given the potential impact of the collaboration between public libraries, local governments, and other stakeholders on the development of smart cities, it is imperative to better understand what affects the extent and the effectiveness of these collaborations.
Our study contributes to addressing this gap by answering the following research question: what are the initial factors that affect the extent and effectiveness of the collaboration between public libraries, local governments, and other organizational actors in the development of smart cities? Among the several collaboration frameworks that have been proposed (e.g., Ansell and Gash, 2007; Emerson et al., 2012), we use the work by Bryson and colleagues (2015) as an analytical framework as it integrates prior research and offers a synopsis of the components of collaborative processes. This framework informs our hypotheses, which we test by quantitively analyzing the results of a national survey of 222 public libraries in the United States that collaborate with local governments and other stakeholders in smart city development.
This article is organized into five sections, including the foregoing introduction. Section two reviews the literature on smart cities as examples of digital transformation at the local level and also includes a review of studies on the collaboration among various stakeholders, including public libraries, to develop smart cities. Section three describes the framework used to analyze the antecedents of collaborations for digital transformation at the local level, particularly in the case of smart cities, and also presents our hypotheses. Section four explains the research design, sample selection, data, and methods used in this article. Section five presents the results of our statistical analysis and their interpretation. Section six discusses our main findings, compares them to previous research, and provides several implications for research and practice. Finally, section seven shares our conclusions, states the limitations of this study, and suggests areas for future research on this topic.
Literature review
The literature review is comprised of two subsections. We start by focusing on smart cities as examples of digital transformation in local governments. Then, we discuss the importance of collaboration for developing smart cities, including the specific case of collaborations between public libraries, local governments, and other stakeholders.
Smart cities as an instance of digital transformation in local governments
Although the state of knowledge and practice is advancing on digital transformation in the public sector, scholars assert that this research area needs more empirical studies (Mergel et al., 2019). Further, most existing research has focused on national governments and thereby could benefit from evidence from local governments, which directly interact with various stakeholders, including citizens, and provide them with critical public infrastructure and services (Bousdekis and Kardaras, 2020; Mossberger et al., 2013). In addition, municipalities have to be responsive as they are government entities closest to the population they serve (Ruud, 2018). Besides these strong ties to their communities, local governments are well-situated to deliver digital public services and generate benefits for various stakeholders by, for example, integrating and leveraging private and public data (Kocaoğlu and Gezici, 2021; Pittaway and Montazemi, 2020).
Local governments have made notable progress in digital transformation beyond the digitization of municipal services and internal processes (e.g., Cordella and Tempini, 2015; Dunleavy, 2005). As part of their digital transformation, local governments have fundamentally changed how they interact with citizens, other administrations, and their employees to achieve specific policy objectives (Kuhlmann and Heuberger, 2021). Further, the co-evolution of these relationships, networks, and corresponding exchanges of knowledge among different groups can facilitate digital transformation at the local level and the innovation necessary to improve urban services (Ho, 2002; Lewis et al., 2017; Liva et al., 2020) as well as the transfer of know-how on how to manage this transformation in local governments (Datta, 2020; Pittaway and Montazemi, 2020). These multi-actor collaborations can also help solve complex problems related to, inter alia, sustainability, mobility, and waste and water management (Hietala et al., 2021; Pereira et al., 2020). Some of these transformative collaborative efforts based on the use of data and technology have been attached to different terms and recent trends in cities.
The smart city stands out among these trends since technologies are particularly salient as one of its main components. The relationship between digital transformation and smart cities is multidimensional and complex. At its core, digital transformation is the process of using digital technologies to change how organizations operate to address challenges and meet objectives (e.g., Vial, 2019). Formally, a city is considered smart when it tackles community problems, improves citizens' quality of life, and contributes to sustainable development through technology, innovation, and active participation of stakeholders including citizens as co-producers, not just passive consumers (Caragliu et al., 2011; Gascó-Hernández, 2016; Gil-García et al., 2015; Hollands, 2008; Nam and Pardo, 2011a). In smart cities, technology is not only used to improve public services and help address pressing urban issues but also to empower and increase opportunities to engage and collaborate with government and non-government stakeholders in the formulation of a smart city vision and the design of specific smart city initiatives (Chen et al., 2022; Lember, 2018; Trivellato, 2017). As such, smart cities are developed for, by, and with various stakeholders including citizens, and depend on participatory governance processes and collaborative organizational capacities in addition to investments in digital technologies and human and social capital (Gascó-Hernández, 2016; Gascó-Hernández et al., 2022b).
Developing smart cities as part of local digital transformation to improve citizens’ quality of life and leverage technology to address urban challenges requires fundamental internal and external changes (Alawadhi et al., 2012; Chourabi et al., 2012; Pereira et al., 2020). Policy and management transformations are needed to mitigate risk and uncertainty associated with advanced technologies and the complexity of public problems while organizational transformation is essential to the creation of the capabilities and conditions for technological innovation (Gascó-Hernández et al., 2022b; Nam and Pardo, 2011b). Further, organizational and institutional transformations are integral to improving urban services through participatory, evidence-based decision-making and advanced collaborations with community organizations to face complex problems (Meijer and Rodríguez Bolívar, 2016; Pereira et al., 2020). In this regard, recent research shows that achieving this transformation with the support of technology mainly requires organizational capacities in terms of management and specifically in the form of strategic leadership and collaboration with government and non-government actors (Gascó-Hernández et al., 2022b). This combination of internal and external transformation that leads to improved governance and collaboration has been framed as the highest level of transformation and referred to as smart urban collaboration in the context of smart cities (Meijer and Rodríguez Bolívar, 2016; Pereira et al., 2020). In this light, smart city initiatives could contribute to digital transformation in local governments as smart cities are built and governed through new ways of working with various collaborators and innovative uses of technology to reinvent themselves and their governance (Hietala et al., 2021; Meijer, 2015; Mergel et al., 2019; Pereira et al., 2017, 2020).
Collaboration between various stakeholders for smart city development
In public management literature, collaboration is viewed as one of the ways to tackle complex problems in which non-government actors actively participate in problem identification and solving as well as decision-making on par with the government (e.g., Emerson et al., 2012). This is based on the realization that these challenges cannot be effectively mitigated in isolation and through the existing capacities and capabilities of public organizations and traditional methods of governance and therefore require collaboration with diverse stakeholders (e.g., Ansell and Gash, 2018). Aware of various conceptualizations, we adopt a definition of collaboration as “a governing arrangement where one or more public agencies directly engage [non-government] stakeholders in a collective decision-making process that is formal, consensus-oriented, and deliberative and that aims to make or implement public policy or manage public programs or assets” (Ansell and Gash, 2007: 544). Collaboration can therefore involve partnerships that include government agencies, non-profit organizations, the private sector, communities, and the larger society; these multi-actor collaborations are considered one of the means of tackling complex public issues, which require new ways of engaging and collaborating with various organizational actors (Bryson et al., 2006; Crosby and Bryson, 2010).
Digital transformation is a complex undertaking that cannot be realized through the actions of a single government agency and calls for a collaborative approach that incorporates the active participation of stakeholders who, with the help of technology, are collectively able to transform public organizations and secure long-term policy objectives (Mergel et al., 2019). In parallel, digital transformation implies different ways and forms of interacting with and considering the needs of heterogeneous stakeholders, which unlocks different types of value by providing services that meet the actual, evolving needs of diverse users (Gong et al., 2020; Hanelt et al., 2021; Scupola and Mergel, 2022). In other words, a government is digitally transformed through new relationships among government agencies and between government and non-government actors, including citizens (Liva et al., 2020; Luna-Reyes and Gil-García, 2014; Meyerhoff Nielsen, 2019), engagement of the end-users as service co-designers and co-producers, and increased responsiveness and flexibility of government agencies (Gong et al., 2020; Janowski, 2015; Mergel et al., 2018). Collaboration is therefore essential for digital transformation in the public sector (Rackwitz et al., 2021; Torfing et al., 2021).
Despite the importance of collaboration for digital transformation in local governments, the extant literature has mainly focused on a few stakeholders such as technology companies, local governments, and universities as current and prospective partners for the development of smart cities (Alawadhi et al., 2012; Mora et al., 2019a, 2019b; Ruhlandt, 2018). The involvement of additional actors, particularly of community organizations such as public libraries is limited despite their potential to become strategic partners in such transformation (Burke et al., 2014; Leorke and Wyatt, 2019; Sayogo et al., 2016). This potential is evident in the literature, which explores how public libraries have evolved from their traditional role as depositories of information and knowledge in the format of books and catalogs to versatile, community-centered institutions able to meet diverse community needs. In this respect, public libraries have been recognized for their ability to extend digital inclusion by providing access and skills to use technology with a purpose (Bertot et al., 2008; Jaeger et al., 2006), serve as community spaces for collective discussion and solving of pressing issues that concern the community (Hildreth, 2012; Kranich, 2012), and offer experimental spaces, technology, training, and connections needed to innovate solutions that improve individual and collective outcomes (Hernández-Pérez et al., 2020; Vilariño and Karatzas, 2018). The aforesaid library contributions are often linked to community development but rarely to the development of smart cities as vehicles of digital transformation at the local level (Mersand et al., 2019).
Nascent research, nonetheless, has started to explore how public libraries contribute to smart city development. This research stream posits that public libraries can be important contributors to smart city development and salient collaborators for: (1) developing smart citizens, (2) facilitating and enabling citizen participation, and (3) offering environments of innovation and technology co-production (Gascó-Hernández et al., 2022a). In particular, public libraries develop smart citizens by providing access to various technologies, including advanced tools (e.g., 3D printers, laser cutters), and offering programs and services that build and improve digital skills to use technology with a purpose, which are proficiencies that are essential to the active participation of diverse stakeholders in smart city initiatives as technology is at the heart of smart cities (Borkowska and Osborne, 2018; Gascó-Hernández, 2016; Tryfonas and Crick, 2018). At the same time, public libraries are perceived as inclusive, safe spaces for community engagement and peer-to-peer learning that can alter how stakeholders, including civil society and citizens, interact, engage, and participate in smart city initiatives design and implementation (Hernández-Pérez et al., 2020; Vårheim, 2017). Public libraries can also provide community-level innovation environments, where various groups, including entrepreneurs, can experiment and innovate in spaces, such as makerspaces, using various technologies (e.g., Mersand et al., 2019) and interact and exchange knowledge to create novel solutions to address some of the community’s challenges as part of local smart city efforts (e.g., Vilariño and Karatzas, 2018).
The three-fold role that public libraries play in the development of smart cities reinforces the collaborative feature of smart cities, for partnerships and collaboration are often the main tool public libraries have to implement many of the programs and services that contribute to a smart(er) city. According to Gascó-Hernández et al. (2022a), collaboration proves “particularly important given the limited staff, scarce resources, and the need to innovate” (p. 429).
However, while there is a growing research interest in exploring how public libraries collaborate for smart city development, previous studies have not addressed in-depth how collaboration actually happens or have not applied existing collaboration frameworks to better understand the partnerships between public libraries and other stakeholders, local governments included, in the context of smart city development. In particular, an evidence-based understanding of the factors that can affect these specific collaborations is still lacking. This gap is concerning as these partnerships are critical to digital transformation processes at the local level. Therefore, it is important to examine the factors that affect the extent and effectiveness of these collaborations in order to fully leverage the potential impact of public libraries on smart city development as prospective partners, facilitators, and capacity builders for helping communities to access and use data, information, and technology to engage with their governments in policy- and decision-making processes (Burke et al., 2014; Leorke and Wyatt, 2019; Sayogo et al., 2016). As the success of collaborations in the public arena depends on several factors (e.g., Bryson et al., 2015), comprehension of these specific determinants can help stakeholders identify conditions under which such collaborations between public libraries and local governments are likely to be most effective and inform actions to foster them. This study aims to address the aforementioned gap by using an established collaboration framework (described in the next section) and analyzing a dataset collected through a survey given that no relevant secondary data are available.
Analytical framework
Given the focus on digital transformation in local governments, this paper analyzes public libraries currently collaborating with local governments or other stakeholders in smart city development and, specifically, the determinants of the extent and effectiveness of these existing collaborations. To do so, we utilize the framework by Bryson and Colleagues (2015) as it synthesizes theoretical and empirical studies on collaboration and offers a comprehensive view for identifying and exploring multiple components of collaborations in the public sector.
In our quantitative models, we then consider the following initial conditions, drivers, and linking mechanisms of collaboration, which are perceived as real antecedents of collaboration even if the external conditions favor its formation (Bryson et al., 2015): (1) agreement on initial aims, (2) preexisting relationships, (3) initial leadership, (4) consequential incentives, and (5) nature of the task. Following a brief discussion of each of these factors, we present the specific hypotheses tested in this study.
First, agreement on initial aims can help specify the roles and interests of the collaborators while reinforcing their interdependence (Ruijer, 2021; Vasconcelos and Nguyen, 2018). Further, scholars posit that these agreements may foster collaborations as they can mediate collective problem definition, vision setting, and consensus on the resources needed to address the immediate problem (Ansell and Gash, 2007; Bryson et al., 2006). Researchers also advise bolstering initial agreements and the effectiveness of collaboration through authoritative texts that formalize, inter alia, the purpose, identity, values, and outcomes of collaboration (Heath and Isbell, 2021; Koschmann et al., 2012). In smart city initiatives, various stakeholders are expected to collaborate and participate in how their cities become smart through transformative strategies, which can improve the effectiveness of these collaborations by communicating a common vision, goals, and roles of the different actors (Angelidou, 2014; Gascó-Hernández, 2016; Mora et al., 2019b). We thus hypothesize that:
An agreement on initial aims has a positive effect on the extent of the collaboration of public libraries with local governments and other stakeholders in the development of smart cities
An agreement on initial aims has a positive effect on the effectiveness of the collaboration of public libraries with local governments and other stakeholders in the development of smart cities Second, preexisting relationships play an important role in multi-actor collaborations. Prior relationships can enable collaborators to better understand each other’s capacities, strengthen trust, form perceptions, and serve as reference points for partner selection in future collaborations (Ansell and Gash, 2007; Bryson et al., 2006). The history of relationships between collaborators can also be instrumental to collective local responses to complex public problems (Curnin and O’Hara, 2019; Simo and Bies, 2007). Public libraries have endured as trusted partners in community development for several years and through various initiatives (e.g., Goodman, 2014). Further, in partnership with universities and non-profits, public libraries have offered programs and resources that can enable citizens to innovate with technology and empower them to participate in smart city initiatives (e.g., Hernández-Pérez et al., 2020). These prior relationships may affect collaborations between public libraries and other stakeholders in smart city development. We then hypothesize that:
Preexisting relationships have a positive effect on the extent of the collaboration of public libraries with local governments and other stakeholders in the development of smart cities
Preexisting relationships have a positive effect on the effectiveness of the collaboration of public libraries with local governments and other stakeholders in the development of smart cities Third, leadership has been well-researched in academic literature from multiple disciplines and identified as critical to collaboration. Some researchers underscore how leaders can unite various stakeholders, safeguard the implementation of a shared vision, manage relationships among collaborators, and level the playing field in terms of power (Emerson et al., 2012; Huxham, 2003; Huxham and Vangen, 2000; Yuan et al., 2022). Certain leadership skills and traits such as age, education, and capacity to mobilize resources and actors to reach a collective goal are especially important (Esteve et al., 2013; McGuire and Silvia, 2010). Since libraries under supportive leadership can become partners and actors in the development of smart cities (Mersand et al., 2019; Yerden et al., 2019), we hypothesize that:
Leadership has a positive effect on the extent of the collaboration of public libraries with local governments and other stakeholders in the development of smart cities
Leadership has a positive effect on the effectiveness of the collaboration of public libraries with local governments and other stakeholders in the development of smart cities Fourth, consequential incentives are perceived as drivers (external or internal) for collaboration, which could be positive or negative (Emerson et al., 2012; Romzek et al., 2012). These incentives can stem from external pressures such as environmental crises, threats, opportunities, or internal pressures such as pressing problems, resource needs, or interests (Emerson, 2018). Further, consequential incentives can intrinsically or extrinsically motivate various actors to collaborate (Ceresia and Misuraca, 2020; March and Olsen, 1998). The range of complex public problems that smart cities intend to address innovatively and the incentives appropriated towards these ends, such as funding, subsidies, and policies, can motivate partnerships and collaborations for smart city development (Khatoun and Zeadally, 2016; Puron-Cid and Gil-Garcia, 2022; Van Winden and van Den Buuse, 2017; Vanolo, 2014). We, therefore, hypothesize that:
Consequential incentives have a positive effect on the extent of the collaboration of public libraries with local governments and other stakeholders in the development of smart cities
Consequential incentives have a positive effect on the effectiveness of the collaboration of public libraries with local governments and other stakeholders in the development of smart cities Finally, the nature of the task mainly characterizes the complexity of a problem that requires collaboration (Bryson et al., 2015). It can influence the membership, structure, and collaboration process (Provan and Kenis, 2007) as partners typically have distinct resources and capacities, which are pooled and leveraged to collectively solve a shared, complex problem (Ansell and Gash, 2018; Crosby and Bryson, 2010; Esteve et al., 2013). Smart city development aims to address these complex problems, an intricate task requiring collaboration among various stakeholders contributing to different aspects of its advancement (Gascó-Hernández, 2018; Meijer and Bolívar, 2016). Based on this, we hypothesize that:
The nature of the task has a positive effect on the extent of the collaboration of public libraries with local governments and other stakeholders in the development of smart cities
The nature of the task has a positive effect on the effectiveness of the collaboration of public libraries with local governments and other stakeholders in the development of smart cities
Research design and methods
Given the lack of data from secondary sources that could be used to test our hypotheses, 1 we chose the survey questionnaire method to reach as many potential respondents as possible in the population of interest and efficiently collect substantial data (Kelley et al., 2003; Trochim and Donnelly, 2008). Further, surveying a sample of a specific population provides a “quantitative description of trends, attitudes, and opinions of [that] population, or tests for associations among variables of [that] population” (Creswell and Creswell, 2018: 207). This survey represents the perspective of public libraries and was part of a larger research project following a strict data collection timeline. Moreover, the survey was national in scope and designed and conducted in partnership with the American Library Association to gather representative data from public libraries and local governments. Conscious of the potential common bias with the same respondents providing input for the measures of both independent and dependent variables (Jakobsen and Jensen, 2015; Kelman, 2015), we separated the measures of independent and dependent variables so that the research intentions could not be easily deduced (Podsakoff et al., 2003).
In addition, in terms of the concept of a “smart city” and how it was managed in the survey, there were a few questions at the beginning of the survey, which were designed to help the researchers understand how respondents understood this concept at the time of filling the survey. For example, we specifically asked about what the concept of a smart city meant to them. We also asked about the aspects or components they considered related or not to this concept and what they perceived the goals of smart cities were. After analyzing these responses, we concluded that definitions of the smart city were similar among the responders: they included several dimensions related to technology, urban operations (e.g., more efficient transportation), quality of life, the local economy (e.g., entrepreneurial activities), and environmental sustainability.
The survey was sent to 8230 public library directors and representatives of library associations across the United States. The former group received invitations to respond between October and November 2020 and the latter between December 2020 and January 2021. In addition, weekly reminders were sent to non-responders and 10% of the sample chosen randomly received follow-up phone calls. Before administration, we conducted two pretests and one pilot test with 5% of the sample (N = 433) and adjusted the content and the process to administer the survey accordingly.
The respondents were mainly public library directors (83.78%) with an average work experience of 12 years. In total, we received 1254 responses. Among these, 222 public libraries responded that, at the moment of completing the survey, they were collaborating with local governments and other stakeholders for smart city development. Therefore, this study includes these 222 responses in our analysis. We used the multiple imputation technique for missing values in the scale-response questions (Rubin, 1996; Schafer, 1999).
For the analysis, we applied multiple linear regression to determine the relationship between two dependent variables (one for the extent of collaboration, the other for the effectiveness of collaboration) and five independent variables. The first dependent variable (extent of current collaboration) is measured by the number of different types of organizations libraries collaborate with to develop smart cities. The second dependent variable (effectiveness of current collaboration) is assessed by a scaled-response question (Likert scale 1–10) on how effective the collaboration between a public library and the local government (or other stakeholders) is in the development of smart cities.
Five independent variables are measured using scaled-response questions (Likert scale 1–10). An agreement on initial aims determines whether a formal agreement on collaboration between the public library and other organizations exists. Preexisting relationships represent the extent of previous collaborations between public libraries and other parties. Leadership is the average of eight sub-indicators that characterize leaders: (1) understanding of community issues, (2) capacity to assemble resources and support to address local issues, (3) ability to communicate the significance of the community issues to collaborators, (4) commitment level, (5) a collaborative mentality, (6) open-mindedness in communication and decision-making, (7) ability to coordinate work internally and externally, and (8) fairness in treating the staff and partners. Consequential incentives are measured as the average score of two drivers for collaboration: (1) the extent of existing community issues and (2) the availability of funding that supports collaboration. The nature of the task is measured by the extent of community challenges that call for collaboration. A table with the operationalization of all dependent and independent variables is provided at the end of the paper in Appendix 1.
Main findings
Summary statistics.
Regression estimates.
Standardized beta coefficients; standard errors in parentheses. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Model (2) explains 31.1% of the variance in the effectiveness of current collaboration in developing smart cities. The coefficients and p-values indicate that agreement on initial aims (β = 0.150, p < 0.05), preexisting relationships (β = 0.409, p < 0.001), and leadership (β = 0.163, p < 0.01) have a statistically significant positive effect on the effectiveness of collaborations between public libraries, local governments, and other organizational actors in developing smart cities. Our data, therefore, support hypotheses H1b, H2b, and H3b.
The results also suggest that the nature of the task does not have a statistically significant effect on either the extent or the effectiveness of the collaboration between public libraries, local governments, and other stakeholders in the development of smart cities.
Discussion and implications
This study aimed to examine the determinants of the collaboration between public libraries and other organizational actors in the development of smart cities, which may be part of digital transformation processes at the local level. Overall, we find that Bryson et al.’s (2015) collaboration framework is useful in understanding the collaborative development of smart cities, showing that the use of this framework can be extended to new initiatives, partnerships, and contexts. In addition, in the following paragraphs, we briefly discuss the main findings, compare them with previous studies, and identify some implications for research and practice.
First, the significance of the agreement on initial aims on both extent and effectiveness suggests that formal agreements on collaboration increase not only the types of stakeholders public libraries collaborate with but also their confidence in the impact of current collaborations for smart city development. This is consistent with previous research on other types of collaboration between different partners, which asserts that formal agreements can condition and strengthen collaborations, regardless of their goals and context, through improved accountability and credibility (Ruijer, 2021; Vasconcelos and Nguyen, 2018). In the case of smart cities, it seems that existing local smart city strategies may help in the creation of these initial agreements, given that they provide formal, shared roadmaps for smart city development and already include aims and goals around which initial agreements may happen (Yerden et al., 2019, 2020). These smart city strategies and plans may therefore result in reaching a shared understanding of goals and objectives among partners sooner than in other types of collaborations, which may amplify the impact on the extent and effectiveness of the collaboration.
Second, the history of collaborations with various stakeholders appears to notably prime libraries to continue collaborating and has the strongest impact in terms of magnitude on the effectiveness of these multi-actor efforts for smart city development compared to other predictors in the model. This is also consistent with current literature, which postulates that previous collaborations with diverse stakeholders can motivate current and future collaborations as well as their effectiveness (Ansell and Gash, 2007; Bryson et al., 2006). However, it seems to be particularly important in the case of public libraries and smart city development. Public libraries have a long history of collaboration with different stakeholders, such as other public libraries, museums, schools, non-profits, and governments (see, for example, Nicholson, 2019; Ogden and Williams, 2022; Rodger et al., 2005). As Gascó-Hernández et al. (2022a) discuss, public libraries have often pursued collaborations that have been key in helping them to offer successful programs and services to their communities, given that they provide resources, but also the additional knowledge that librarians and library staff may not have. The role public libraries play in developing smart cities only adds to this extended history of collaboration and builds on successful partnerships public libraries may already have.
Third, leadership has the strongest impact on the extent of collaboration compared to other predictors in the model, suggesting that leadership can broaden collaborations between libraries and other stakeholders. Concomitantly, the results show that leadership also improves the outcomes of such partnerships. These findings align with some past studies that accentuate that leaders and their characteristics can be instrumental to both the inception and outcomes of collaborations (Crosby and Bryson, 2010; Esteve et al., 2013; McGuire and Silvia, 2010). The novelty of this finding is that it adds empirical evidence to the notion that community organizations such as public libraries, which have leaders with a collaborative orientation, can become salient partners and actors in smart city development (Mersand et al., 2019). More importantly, this result seems to indicate that public libraries’ leadership (mainly directors) may play a greater and more impactful role in the success of smart cities than the one they have usually played in previous partnerships and collaborations. This is significant given that local governments’ staff traditionally lead smart city efforts.
Fourth, consequential incentives have a statistically significant positive effect only on the extent of collaboration between public libraries, local governments, and other stakeholders in smart city development. As previously stated, the scale of some community issues and the availability of incentives, such as funding, can motivate public libraries to collaborate with others in developing smart cities, but this does not necessarily increase the perceived effectiveness. This is partially consistent with the conclusions of previous research, which argues that internal and external drivers can compel organizations to collaborate (Emerson, 2018; Emerson et al., 2012; Khatoun and Zeadally, 2016; Puron-Cid and Gil-Garcia, 2022; Romzek et al., 2012). This finding suggests that, in the context of smart cities, while incentives can be effective in initiating collaboration, they may not necessarily lead to better outcomes or can sustain collaborations over time. Further, the effectiveness of increased collaborations could also be contingent on the long-term maintenance of shared goals and objectives; changing priorities over time could then influence the effectiveness of collaboration. Also, while incentives might encourage collaboration, less than optimal allocation of such resources throughout collaboration could affect the effectiveness of these partnerships.
Lastly, the nature of the task does not have a statistically significant effect on the collaboration’s extent or effectiveness. In other words, the existence of complex problems that require collaboration does not necessarily influence the willingness of public libraries and other stakeholders to collaborate or their perceptions of the effectiveness of collaborations for smart city development. This is inconsistent with existing literature, which highlights that addressing these complex problems through smart city development requires collaboration among diverse stakeholders that contribute to its different facets (Gascó-Hernández, 2018; Meijer and Bolívar, 2016). However, this could be partially explained by previous research on public libraries highlighting that community organizations, through limited partnerships or on their own, are capable of addressing complex problems such as digital inclusion, social welfare, and community development (Bertot et al., 2008; Kranich, 2012). This also suggests that problem complexity may not be the primary driver of collaboration for smart city development between public libraries and other stakeholders, underscoring the importance of considering the unique characteristics of different collaborators (e.g., missions, values, motivations) in such efforts. Further, the responsibility for many complex problems usually falls on the local governments, and thereby public libraries may not perceive they should be initiating collaborations to address problems outside their responsibilities.
This article has the following implications for research. Our study suggests that specific variables affect collaborations between public libraries and other organizational actors for smart city initiatives as examples of digital transformation in local governments. We contribute to the emerging research (Gascó-Hernández et al., 2022a; Mersand et al., 2019) by exploring the specific determinants of the extent and effectiveness of these collaborations for smart city development. The study of the organizational determinants of collaboration has added to the recent literature on smart cities as vehicles of digital transformation at the local level (Gascó-Hernández et al., 2022b). By examining public libraries, we also add empirical evidence to the limited knowledge of collaborations with community organizations for smart city development (Burke et al., 2014; Leorke and Wyatt, 2019; Sayogo et al., 2016). Further, this article contributes to multidisciplinary research on collaboration, which has been an area of interest for public administration scholars (e.g., Ansell and Gash, 2007; Bryson et al., 2006) and researchers studying digital transformation at the local level (e.g., Mergel et al., 2019; Pereira et al., 2020) as well as smart city development (e.g., Meijer and Rodríguez Bolívar, 2016; Pereira et al., 2017). Although we tested only a few aspects of one specific collaboration framework, the one proposed by Bryson and Colleagues (2015), we found this framework useful for better understanding the relationships between local governments and community organizations to achieve digital transformation. In particular, initial conditions, drivers, and linking mechanisms of collaboration can be seen as valuable determinants of multi-actor collaborations for smart city development. Finally, this paper links literature from Public Management and Digital Government, which, if integrated, could significantly advance the state of knowledge in both research fields (Gil-Garcia et al., 2018). This link is made in the specific context of the determinants of collaboration between public libraries, local governments, and other stakeholders for the development of smart cities.
This paper also has some practical implications. Our article shows that public libraries need to be aware of specific factors that can significantly affect the extent and effectiveness of collaborations with various stakeholders to become strategic partners in smart city development. In parallel, for local governments, a grasp of the exact factors can help improve collaborations with community organizations, such as public libraries, that have not been traditionally involved in digital transformation processes. For local government and public libraries, recognizing the factors that affect partnerships can help them to better prepare, plan, and organize collaborations for digital transformation using existing capacities and scarce resources. In this regard, organizational capacities, such as managerial leadership, are particularly important as we find leaders with a collaborative orientation to be one of the factors that can significantly affect the collaboration between public libraries and local governments for smart city development. Further, these partnerships may need to invest in relationship management as past and present collaborations affect future collaborations and significantly impact their outcomes. Also, the finding that consequential incentives have a positive effect only on the extent of collaboration could help public libraries and local governments rethink how they allocate resources (e.g., funding) and better encourage collaborations for digital transformation and smart city development. This study also shows that the extent and effectiveness of collaborations between community organizations, such as public libraries, and local governments depend not solely on the need for funding but also on leadership and past experiences. As such, the extent and effectiveness of these collaborations hinge on a mix of internal and external changes: the transformation of current governance processes and collaborative approaches as well as investments in technology and existing human and social capital.
Conclusions
In this study, we explored emergent collaborations for digital transformation in local governments by examining the engagement of public libraries, local governments, and other stakeholders in smart city development. To do so, we quantitatively analyzed data from a national survey based on an established collaboration framework. We conclude that the extent and the effectiveness of collaborations between public libraries, local governments, and other stakeholders for smart city development are significantly affected by specific variables: leadership, preexisting relationships, and agreement on initial aims. This article shows the theoretical and practical importance of exploring the determinants of collaboration with non-government actors to create value through digital transformation in local governments.
This study has several limitations, which could be potential avenues for future research. First, the response rate was relatively low, partly due to the coronavirus pandemic. However, as explained early in the paper, we did our best to increase the response rate as much as possible given the circumstances (e.g., by sending several reminders and calling a random sample of survey respondents). With that said, future research could test the validity of the proposed quantitative model in different contexts and with a higher response rate if possible. Also, given that public libraries collaborate with different stakeholders, future research could test whether the results change depending on the specific type of organizations that libraries collaborate with. Further, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the motivations and values of public libraries and their partners in smart city development. At the same time, the findings of this paper go beyond existing research by showing the need to contextualize existing collaborative models to ensure that such partnerships are both effective and sustainable when involving heterogeneous actors.
We also recognize that despite our efforts, respondents might have emphasized different aspects of the smart city concept while responding to the survey questions. However, as explained in the methods section, based on our initial questions, we know that respondents were considering similar characteristics of the smart city concept. In addition, the findings are based on a survey conducted in the U.S., which means its external validity could be limited and caution should be taken with generalizing beyond this context. Further, this study is informed by a survey of mainly public library directors as we intentionally focused on the perspective of libraries. Therefore, our findings do not reflect the perspectives of patrons and other actors involved in these collaborations and we recognize that further research could include a case study approach to capture those additional points of view. Future research could also examine the dynamics of the partnerships between public libraries and local governments through a longitudinal study.
Also, as the data is cross-sectional, the findings should not necessarily be interpreted as causal but correlational. However, the framework used as the basis for this research is well-established and the relationships have been studied empirically in the past, which could suggest a potential for causality based on a strong theoretical foundation. Moreover, there could be other confounders that could have affected our estimates. Therefore, future studies should attempt to identify as many confounding variables as possible and include them in the model to control for them. In addition, although our operationalization of the variables is based on an extensive literature review, it is not perfect and could be improved in future studies.
This study tested just a few variables of a complex model. Therefore, future studies can test other framework components by Bryson and Colleagues (2015). For instance, factors such as trust, commitment, shared understanding of the problem, and legitimacy could be explored to better understand the process, structure, accountabilities, and outcomes, which ultimately may affect the extent and effectiveness of collaborations. Also, the interrelationships between the two dependent variables could be examined as there could be interaction effects. Finally, this paper’s findings could also be triangulated with qualitative methods, such as case studies, to further understand the relations that shape collaborations for digital transformation in local governments.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services; LG-96-17-0144-17.
Note
Appendix
Variables
Questions
Measurement
IV1: An agreement on initial aims
There are often written agreements about the collaboration between our public library and the local government on city/community development
Likert scale 1-10
IV2: Preexisting relationships
Our public library has a long history (more than 3 years) of collaborating with the local government in community development
Likert scale 1-10
IV3: Leadership
1. The leadership in our public library believes that there are community development issues that need to be addressed
Likert scale 1-10
2. The leadership in our public library helps secure resources and support to address community issues
3. The leadership in our public library has the ability to frame community issues to make diverse partners understand the issues’ importance and relevance
4. The leadership in our public library is committed to collaborative problem-solving
5. The leadership in our public library has a collaborative mindset.
6. The leadership in our public library is open-minded during discussion and decision-making
7. The leadership in our public library has the ability to coordinate work across departments, branches, and organizations
8. The leadership in our public library treats every employee and work partners equally
IV4: Consequential incentives
1. Our city has encountered significant challenges in becoming smarter
Likert scale 1-10
2. There are often grants and other funding opportunities that support collaboration on city/community development
IV5: Nature of the task
These community development challenges call for collaboration among different organizations within the community
Likert scale 1-10
DV1: The extent of collaboration
What type(s) of organizations has your public library collaborated with in developing a smart city? (Please select all that apply)
Multiple choices
DV2: The effectiveness of collaboration
How effective is the collaboration between your public library and the local government in developing a smart city?
Likert scale 1-10
