Selection and Optimization of Piezoelectric Polyvinylidene Fluoride Polymers for Adaptive Optics in Space Environments

Abstract

Various piezoelectric polymers based on polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) are of interest for large aperture space-based telescopes. Dimensional adjustments of adaptive polymer films depend on charge deposition and require a detailed understanding of the piezoelectric material responses which are expected to deteriorate owing to strong vacuum UV, γ -, X-ray, energetic particles and atomic oxygen exposure. We have investigated the degradation of PVDF and its copolymers under various stress environments detrimental to reliable operation in space. Initial radiation aging studies have shown complex material changes with lowered Curie temperatures, complex material changes with lowered melting points, morphological transformations and significant crosslinking, but little influence on piezoelectric d₃₃ constants. Complex aging processes have also been observed in accelerated temperature environments inducing annealing phenomena and cyclic stresses. The results suggest that poling and chain orientation are negatively affected by radiation and temperature exposure. A framework for dealing with these complex material qualification issues and overall system survivability predictions in low earth orbit conditions has been established. It allows for improved material selection, feedback for manufacturing and processing, material optimization/stabilization strategies and provides guidance on any alternative materials.

Keywords

Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)polymer materials performance space environment exposure selection characterization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Martin J W , Redmond J M , Barney P S , Henson T D , Wehlburg J C and Main J A 2000 J. Intel. Mater Smart Struct. 11 744

George P E and Dursch H W 1994 J. Adv. Mater. 25 (3) 10

Young P R , Siochi E J and Slemp W S 1994 Polymer Preprints 35(2) 916

Young P , Siochi E J and Slemp W S 1996 Molecular level response of selected polymeric materials to the low earth orbit environment. In Irradiation of Polymers R Clough and S W Shalaby , eds ( Washington DC: ACS Books ) p. 264

Dever J A , De Groh K K , Banks B A and Townsend J A 1999 High Perf. Polym. 11 123

Dever J A , DeGroh K K , Banks B A , Townsend J A , Barth J L , Thomson S , Gregory T and Savage W 2000 High Perf. Polym. 12 125

Banks B A 1997 The use of fluoropolymers in space applications. In Modern Fluoropolymers J Scheirs ed. ( Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons ) Chapter 4

Clough R L , Gillen K T and Dole M 1991 Radiation resistance of polymers and composites. In Irradiation Effects on Polymers D W Clegg and A. A. Collyer eds ( London: Elsevier London ) p. 79

Dever J A , Bruckner J and Rodriquez E , 1992 Synergistic Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation, Thermal Cycling, and Atomic Oxygen on Altered and Coated Kapton Surfaces, NASA Tech . Memo. (NASA-TM-105363)

10.

Dursch H W and Pippin H G 1990 Effects of simulated space environments on properties of selected materials. In Materials Degradation in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) V Srinivasan and B Banks eds ( Warrendale, PA: The Minerals Metals & Materials Society ) p. 207

11.

Hansen P A , Townsend J A , Yoshikawa Y , Castro J D , Triolo J J and Peters W C 1998 Degradation of Hubble telescope metallized teflon FEP thermal control materials . In 43rd International SAMPE Symposium May -June p. 570

12.

James B F , Norton O W and Alexander M B 1994 The Natural Space Environment: Effects on Spacecraft, NASA Reference Publication 1350

13.

Silverman E M 1995 Space Environmental Effects on Spacecraft: LEO Materials Selection Guide, NASA Contractor Report 4661, URL: http://see.msfc.nasa.gov/mp/NASA-95-cr4661pt1.pdf, [cited 16 March 2004]

14.

Pippin G , Spacecraft Materials Selector Expert System, URL http://see.msfc.nasa.gov/see/mp/model_sms.html, [cited 16 March 2004]

15.

SUSIM: An NRL Program to Measure Solar Ultraviolet Irradiance, URL: http://wwwsolar.nrl.navy.mil/susim.html [cited 16 March 2004]

16.

Floyd L E , Cook J W , Herring L C and Crane P C 2003 Adv. Space Research 31 2111

17.

Simpson J , Ounaies Z and Fay C 1996 Polarization and piezoelectric properties of a nitrile substituted polyimide . In Materials for Smart Systems II. Symposium 2-5 Dec, Boston

18.

Nalwa H S 1995 Ferroelectric Polymers: Chemistry, Physics, and Applications. ( New York: M. Dekker Inc. )

19.

Vinogradov A and Holloway F 1999 Ferroelectrics 226 169

20.

Bar-Cohen Y , Sherrit S and Shyh-Shiuh L 2001 Proc SPIE - The Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 4329 319

21.

LyonsBJ 1995 Rad. Phys. Chem. 45(2) 159

22.

Forsythe J S and Hill D J T 2000 Prog. Polym. Sci. 25 101

23.

Kepler G R and Anderson R A 1980 Piezoelectricity in Polymers. CRC Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Science, vol.9, p.399

24.

25.

Dargaville T R , Celina M C and Chaplya P M 2005 J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Phys. 43 1310

26.

Isbester P K , Brandt J L , Kestner T A and Munson E J 1998 Macromolecules 31 8192

27.

Tonelli A E , Schilling F C and Cais R E 1982 Macromolecules 15 849

28.

Aimi K , Ando S , Avalle P and Harris R K 2004 Polymer 45 2281

29.

Wormald P , Apperley D C , Beaume F and Harris R K 2003 Polymer 44 643

30.

Frigge K , Geiss D , Janke A and Kuenstler W 1988 Act. Polym. 39 168