Using warm accumulative roll bonding method to produce Al-Al 2 O 3 metal matrix composite

Abstract

In this study, warm accumulative roll bonding process has been used to produce metal matrix composite (Al/1% Al₂O₃). The microstructure and mechanical properties of composites have been studied after different warm accumulative roll bonding cycles by tensile test, Vickers micro-hardness test and scanning electron microscopy. The scanning electron microscopy results reveal that during higher warm accumulative roll bonding cycles, the layers of alumina particles are broken. It leads to the generation of elongated dense clusters with smaller sizes. This microstructure evolution leads to improve the hardness, strength and elongation during the accumulative roll bonding process. The results demonstrated that the dispersed alumina clusters improve both the strength and toughness of the composites. Also, an extra pass of cold rolling on the final warm accumulative roll bonding product shows the ability to obtain further strength. In general, warm accumulative roll bonding process would allow fabricating metal particle reinforced with high uniformity, good mechanical properties and high bonding strength.

Keywords

Metal matrix composites warm accumulative roll bonding particle-reinforced composites mechanical properties fractography

Introduction

Aluminum metal matrix composites (Al MMCs) are being considered as a group of new advanced materials in industries due to their light weight, good wear and corrosion resistance, high strength and high modulus of elasticity and low coefficient of thermal expansion. Several methods are used to fabricate MMCs, such as powder metallurgy,¹ squeeze casting and spray forming,^2,3 accumulative roll bonding (ARB),⁴ equal channel angular pressing (ECAP)^5,6 and multi-axial forging. Among these processes, ARB and cyclic extrusion compression (CEC) are known as kinds of severe plastic deformation (SPD) methods.⁷

Most of the ARB production methods are based on “Cold-ARB” implemented at the ambient temperature.⁸ In this method, using fine particles is a common practice for producing MMC. For example, tungsten and copper are used as metallic particles.^9,10 Ceramic particles in aluminum matrix such as SiC, TiC, WC, SiO₂ and B₄C are used as in MMCs.^11–14 Fabricating of composite by Cold-ARB process has a weak bonding strength due to severe work hardening of metal layers. For example, large number of cracks begin to nucleate and propagate during cold rolling passes.¹⁵

Reduction and temperature are two key factors which are essential precondition for an acceptable bonding of composite layers. At higher reduction of thickness, the bonding strength between two layers of composite was improved.^11,16 Very limited works are presented in the literature regarding ARB at higher temperature. By increasing the rolling temperature, the peeling force between composite layers enhances. Milner et al.¹⁷ used Warm-ARB method on commercially pure titanium. They studied the effect of number of cycles on strength, grain size and micro-hardness.

The aim of this study is to fabricate metal particle reinforced by Warm-ARB at 280 °C. Because of higher temperature, the material has a better flow across the composite layers and the bonding strength increases. It was attempted to manufacture Al/1% Al₂O₃ MMC with uniform distributed alumina powder in the Al matrix and evaluate the microstructure and mechanical properties such as hardness, strength, elongation and toughness of this composite. The main incentive for these investigations is improving the mechanical properties of Al with the homogeneous distribution of powder particles.

Experimental procedure

The material used in this study was Al-1050 fully annealed strips. The chemical composition of this alloy is presented in Table 1. Figure 1 illustrates the experimental setup which has been designed for Warm-ARB in this study. The strip was annealed at 400 °C for 1 h. Two sheets in a length, width and thickness 200, 50 and 2 mm were degreased in acetone for 10 min. For fabricating the primary composite in order to remove the surface oxide layer, strips fully brushed to guarantee an acceptable bonding between the layers. Alumina powder with average size 2 µm (Figure 2) was dispersed between the two layers to obtain the primary sandwich by hot rolling process. For dispersing the alumina particles, an ethanol base suspension was prepared and was put under ultrasonic waves with 50 kHz frequency for 30 min in an oven. Alumina particles were deposited uniformly and ethanol was evaporated. For obtaining the primary sandwich, two strips were stacked together and roll-bonded with 75% reduction (effective strain equal to 1.6) at 400 °C without any lubrication to obtain 1-mm strip (Figure 3(a)). This initial product is called “Zero Cycle or cycle 0” in this article.

Table 1.

Chemical composition of aluminum 1050.

Element	Al	Cr	Si	Fe	Mn	Zn	Ti	Cu	Ni
Wt%	99.488	0.0016	0.12	0.222	0.032	0.01	0.005	0.12	0.0014

Figure 1.

Experimental setup for warm rolling.

Figure 2.

SEM image of the Al₂O₃ particles.

Figure 3.

Schematic illustration of the production process of the Al/Al₂O₃ composite sheet (a) primary cycle (cycle 0) and (b) main cycles.

After cycle 0, primary Al/1% Al₂O₃ sandwich was annealed again as the same condition of first annealing. This removes work hardening and improves the bonding strength of the primary sandwich. The reduction of all passes (from cycle 1 to cycle 8) were equal to 50% with an effective strain equal to 0.8.

The roll diameter and the rolling speed (ω) were 170 mm and 36 r min⁻¹. The primary sandwich was cut into two strips and preheated at 280 °C for 5 min. In the next step (Figure 3(b)), two strips of MMC were stacked together after degreasing and wire-brushing. The roll-bonded sheet was cut into two sheets, and the 50% roll-bonding process was repeated up to eight cycles. During these eight ARB cycles, it is expected to have more homogeneous structure by better dispersion of the powder particles. After the eighth cycle, the number of the powder layers is 512 within the strip. The steps of the production process of the Al/Al₂O₃ composite are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Specifications of the Warm-ARB process for production of Al/Al₂O₃ composite.

No. of cycles	Rolling temperature (°C)	No. of Al-layers	No. of Al₂O₃ layers	Reduction in each cycle (%)	The Al-layers thickness (µm)	Total reduction (%)	Effective strain (ε_ef)
0	400	2	1	75	500	75^a	1.6^a
1	280	4	2	50	250	50	0.8
2	280	8	4	50	125	75	1.6
3	280	16	8	50	62.5	87.5	2.4
4	280	32	16	50	31.25	93.75	3.2
5	280	64	32	50	15.625	96.87	4
6	280	128	64	50	7.81	98.43	4.8
7	280	256	128	50	3.9	99.21	5.6
8	280	512	256	50	1.95	99.6	6.4
9^b	27	512	256	50	0.975	99.8	7.2

After the zero cycle, the sample is annealed at 400 °C for 1 h; therefore, the strain exerted in the zero cycle would be removed.

Cycle 9 refers to cycle 8 + 1 pass cold roll.

The tensile test specimens were machined from the rolled strips according to the ASTM-E8M standard,¹⁸ which were oriented along the rolling direction (Figure 4). The gauge length and the width of the tensile test specimens were 25 and 6 mm, respectively. Tensile tests were conducted at ambient temperature on a Hounds field H50KS testing machine at a strain rate of 1.67 × 10⁻⁴ s⁻¹. The tensile test was repeated three times for each sample. The Vickers hardness test was done by standard ASTM-E384 under the load of 500 g force in 15 s on the composites. The hardness test was done on more than five points and the average number was reported.

Figure 4.

Orientation of the tensile test specimens.

Results and discussion

First of all, in order to study the evolution of mechanical properties during Warm-ARB process, six samples of Al/1% Al₂O₃ MMC with 0, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 cycles were fabricated. Then, tensile and hardness tests were carried out and finally their fracture surface of the tensile test specimens were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Tensile strength

Tensile tests have been carried out for different ARB cycles (Figure 5). The strength of the primary sandwich (cycle 0) is equal to 90 MPa. Figure 6 shows that the yield and tensile strength are considerably increased by the first cycle (130 MPa) but when the number of cycles increases, the tensile strength remains approximately constant up to cycle 8 (139 MPa). This behavior can be explained based on two mechanisms. The first is due to the hardening (dislocation strengthening)¹⁹ and the second is due to the production of ultra-fine grains (grain boundary strengthening mechanism).²⁰ Dispersing of alumina particles has a main role for increasing the strength hardening in the second stage.²¹ The particles activate slip systems in the Al matrix near its adjacent layers. The density and locally strain hardening of these regions increased from first cycle to eighth cycle. As it can be seen from Figure 7, after cycle 0, a disrupted layer of powder remains straightly and it can be observed in the cross section separately. After the subsequent passes, more discontinuous chain of alumina particles are observed between the aluminum layers.

Figure 5.

Engineering stress–strain tensile test curves for Al/Al₂O₃ composites before and after Warm-ARB.

Figure 6.

Mechanical properties of the Al/Al₂O₃ composites, produced by the Warm-ARB process in various cycles.

Figure 7.

SEM micrographs of Al/Al₂O₃composites cross section after (a) zero (primary sandwich), (b) two, (c) four and (d) eight cycles.

Figure 7(a)–(d) shows the composite cross sections in cycles 0, 2, 4 and 8. As it can be seen from Figure 7(c) and (d), it is very difficult to identify the number of layers in the micrograph. It can also be observed that the thickness of dense clusters decreases and consequently the size of them decreases too. Figure 7(d) illustrates that after the eighth cycle, the uniformity of clusters increases considerably. In other words, during the rolling process, the Al matrix flows between the clusters, and as a result, the distance between the particles increases.

From cycle 0 to cycle 1, the maximum elongation decreases from 24% to 1.8%, but the trend is reversed from cycle 1 to cycle 8. For the final Warm-ARB cycle, the maximum elongation value shows a value equal to 7.4% (Figure 6). This behavior is attributed to (1) increasing the uniformity of particles, (2) increasing the bond strength between the Al matrices and (3) decreasing the porosities in the clusters. Figure 8 compares the SEM micrographs of primary sandwich and the final composite after eight ARB cycles. The eighth micrograph shows a diffused interface with a good continuity and sphericity. On the other hand, after the eighth cycle, the porosities in the clusters are eliminated.²²

Figure 8.

SEM micrograph representing the interface of Al₂O₃ cluster with Al matrices after (a) primary sandwich (zero cycle) and (b) eighth cycle.

Figure 9 shows the average micro-hardness and toughness of composites after various ARB cycles. The average micro-hardness increases rapidly from cycle 0 to cycle 4 and remained approximately constant from cycle 4 to cycle 8. In some studies, it is reported that the initial increase of average micro-hardness seems to be related to the strain hardening.^22–25 The rapid increase in micro-hardness after initial cycles is due to the initial reduction of grain size and growth of dislocation density inside the crystalline lattice which leads to initial strain hardening.²⁵ The hardness value is saturated for larger number of cycles, as previously reported in the ultrafine grained (UFG) materials produced by ARB process.^26–28

Figure 9.

Variations of average micro-hardness values and toughness with the Warm-ARB cycles.

The toughness value of the composite (Figure 9) decreases considerably from cycle 0 (19.1 J m⁻³ × 10⁴) to cycle 1 (2.1 J m⁻³ × 10⁴). This behavior is due to the strain hardening and the less mobility of dislocations.²⁵ There is a little growth in the toughness from cycle 1 to cycle 4, but this becomes faster than the cycle 4 (4.5 J m⁻³ × 10⁴) to cycle 8 (9.6 J m⁻³ × 10⁴). An increase in the strength and strain amplitudes of the samples during ARB process leads to increase in the toughness of the produced Al/Al₂O₃ composite (Figure 5). Increasing the number of ARB cycles increases the bond strength among the layers and the particles homogeneity and it decreases the size of clusters (Figure 8). Also, uniform dispersion of the alumina particles due to the breaking of alumina clusters improves the elongation of samples. Moreover, by uniform dispersion of the alumina particles, local strain hardening occurs around the particles, and as a result, the strength of samples increases slightly in the samples with higher number of cycles. Both of these two parameters—(1) increasing the strength during the ARB and (2) increasing the elongation of samples with the ARB cycles—improve the toughness value as well as the elongation of the samples.

Hardness test

The average Vickers micro-hardness of the fabricated MMCs is presented in Figure 9 as a function of the ARB cycles. It shows that from cycle 0 to cycle 2, there is a rapid rise in the amount of average hardness while from cycle 4 to cycle 8, it has a minor additional change. This minor increase is attributed to strain hardening. In other words, when the number of cycle increases, dislocations saturation happens at larger strains. The saturation of the hardness is observed after higher cycles and this has been reported in ultra-fine grain materials fabricated by severe plastic deformation previously.^23,29 This fact can be explained that after a certain plastic deformation, the materials reach to a certain steady-state density of dislocations. By increasing the number of cycles, the distribution of particles in the matrix becomes more uniform and the percentage of porosities decreases. After a certain number of cycles, the porosities are omitted and the average hardness value increases to its maximum value until the hardness saturation occurs afterward.²³

Fractography

A scanning electron microscopic (SEM) study was used in order to clarify the rupture mechanism in the primary sandwich (cycle 0), cycle 2, 4 and 8. The fracture surfaces after the tensile test of the composites are shown in Figure 10. The primary sandwich exhibits a typical ductile fracture with deep dimples (Figure 10(a) and (b)). This is similar to other soft materials which have fracture surfaces with deep gray fibrous appearance and hemispheroidal dimples.²² Figure 10(c)–(f) clearly reveals that composite with two and four cycles exhibits a fracture surface with dimples and shear zones. By increasing the ARB cycles, the fracture surface is not as deep as the earlier cycles and deep dimples are shrinking slowly. At earlier cycles, the fracture surfaces have deep and elongated dimples. But at higher cycles, the main fracture surfaces do not show elongated and deep shape dimples. Deep and elongated dimples are the result of the nucleation of micro voids. Their growth in the structure and finally their coalescence is affected by shear stress.²⁷ Figure 10(g) and (h) shows the fracture surface of the composite after cycle 8. Alumina powders have a significant effect on the fracture surface of composites. Their presence on the core and walls of dimples implies that these particles (agglomeration and particle–matrix interface) provided suitable sites for crack initiation and nucleation. Cracks propagate among the particle–matrix interfaces as weak places in the structure.^23,28

Figure 10.

The fracture surfaces after the tensile test for (a, b) primary composite (pass zero), (c, d) composite with 2, (e, f) with 4 and (g, h) with eight Warm-ARB cycles after the tensile test. They are shown in two magnifications.

Effect of cold rolling on the final product

After the final pass (cycle 8), a single cold rolling pass was done on the MMC product. It considerably increased the material strength. Figure 5 shows the stress–strain curve of the cold rolled material in comparison with other cycles. The results seem promising with 183 MPa strength which has 34% increase in comparison with cycle 8 (139 MPa). This can be rolled further which is recommended to be investigated as future work.

Conclusion

In this study, Al-1050 and fine particles of alumina were used to produce Al/1% Al₂O₃ MMC with fine and uniform clusters of alumina particles successfully by Warm-ARB process. The following conclusions can be highlighted briefly:

Warm-ARB process can be used to produce high-strength MMC with higher toughness than conventional.

The microstructures revealed the clusters of alumina particles in the Al matrix elongated in the rolling direction. As the ARB cycles increase, the uniformity of clusters increases considerably.

The tensile strength of the composites increases with ARB cycles and reaches a maximum value of 147 MPa after second cycle, which was 1.63 times higher than the strength of the primary sandwich.

The maximum elongation of primary sandwich (annealed) is 24%, while after the first cycle it was reduced sharply to 1.8%, but it increases to 7.4% after the eighth cycle. This means that the alumina has an enhancing effect on the elongation after a certain number of cycles.

The toughness of primary sandwich is 19.1 J m⁻³ × 10⁴ while the toughness after the first cycle is 2.1 J m⁻³ × 10⁴ which is less than that of primary composite. By increasing the number of cycles, the toughness reaches to 9.6 J m⁻³ × 10⁴ after the eighth cycle. In other words, the alumina particles enhance the toughness of composite with more cycles.

The average micro-hardness value of Al/Al₂O₃ MMC increases with increasing ARB cycles. This demonstrates that adding of alumina particles to Al matrix leads to an improvement of the hardness.

One cycle of cold rolling with a 50% reduction was done on the cycle 8 to show that the final MMC product has the ability of even higher strength under cold work hardening.

Future work can be conducted to investigate the effect of further cold rolling passes on this MMC product.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

Seah

KHW

Hemanth

Sharma

. Effect of high-rate heat transfer during casting on the strength, hardness and wear behaviour of aluminium-quartz particulate metal matrix composites. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2003; 217: 651–659.

Prasad

Asthana

. Aluminum metal-matrix composites for automotive applications: tribological considerations. Tribol Lett 2004; 17: 445–453.

Lee

Kang

. Effect of solid fraction on formability and mechanical properties in a vertical-type rheo squeeze-casting process. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2011; 225: 184–196.

Saito

Utsunomiya

Tsuji

. Novel ultra-high straining process for bulk materials—development of the accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Acta Mater 1999; 47: 579–583.

Utsunomiya

Saito

Suzuki

. Development of the continuous shear deformation process. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2001; 215: 947–957.

Asl

Meratian

Emamikhah

. Mechanical properties and machinability of 6061 aluminum alloy produced by equal-channel angular pressing. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2015; 229: 1302–1313.

Yin

. Nanostructural formation of fine grained aluminum alloy by severe plastic deformation at cryogenic temperature. J Mater Sci 2004; 39: 2851–2854.

Kok

. Production and mechanical properties of Al₂O₃ particle-reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites. J Mater Process Tech 2004; 161: 381–387.

Liu

Wang

Jia

. Effect of W particles on the properties of accumulatively roll-bonded Al/W composites. Mat Sci Eng A 2012; 547: 120–124.

10.

Alizadeh

Talebian

. Fabrication of Al/Cup composite by accumulative roll bonding process and investigation of mechanical properties. Mat Sci Eng A 2012; 558: 331–337.

11.

Tieu

Wexler

. Significant enhancement of bond strength in the accumulative roll bonding process using nano-sized SiO2 particles. J Mater Process Tech 2009; 209: 4830–4834.

12.

Lindroos

Talvitie

. Recent advance in metal matrix composites. J Mater Process Tech 1995; 53: 273–284.

13.

Liu

Wang

Jia

. Evaluation of mechanical properties of 1060-Al reinforced with WC particles via warm accumulative roll bonding process. Mater Design 2013; 43: 367–372.

14.

Ipek

. Adhesive wear behaviour of B4C and SiC reinforced 4147 Al matrix composites (Al/B4C–Al/SiC). J Mater Process Tech 2005; 162–163: 71–75.

15.

Bogucka

. Influence of temperature of accumulative roll bonding on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AA5251 aluminum alloy. Arch Metall Mater 2014; 59: 16–20.

16.

Rezayat

Akbarzadeh

. Bonding behavior of Al–Al2O3 laminations during roll bonding process. Mater Design 2012; 36: 874–879.

17.

Milner

Abu-Farha

Bunget

. Grain refinement and mechanical properties of CP-Ti processed by warm accumulative roll bonding. Mat Sci Eng A 2013; 561: 109–117.

18.

ASTM E8/E8M:2010. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials 1.

19.

Huang

Tsuji

Hansen

. Microstructural evolution during accumulative roll-bonding of commercial purity aluminum. Mat Sci Eng A 2003; 340: 265–271.

20.

Hansen

Huang

Ueji

. Structure and strength after large strain deformation. Mat Sci Eng A 2004; 387–389: 191–194.

21.

Alizadeh

Paydar

Sharifian Jazi

. Structural evaluation and mechanical properties of nanostructured Al/B4C composite fabricated by ARB process. Compos Part B: Eng 2013; 44: 339–343.

22.

Jamaati

Toroghinejad

. Application of ARB process for manufacturing high-strength, finely dispersed and highly uniform Cu/Al2O3 composite. Mat Sci Eng A 2010; 527: 7430–7435.

23.

Alizadeh

Paydar

. Study on the effect of presence of TiH 2 particles on the roll bonding behavior of aluminum alloy strips. Mater Design 2009; 82–86.

24.

Jamaati

Toroghinejad

. Manufacturing of high-strength aluminum/alumina composite by accumulative roll bonding. Mat Sci Eng A 2010; 527: 4146–4151.

25.

Rezayat

Akbarzadeh

Owhadi

. Production of high strength Al–Al₂O₃ composite by accumulative roll bonding. Compos Part A: Appl S 2012; 43: 261–267.

26.

Jamaati

Toroghinejad

Dutkiewicz

. Investigation of nanostructured Al/Al2O3 composite produced by accumulative roll bonding process. Mater Design 2012; 35: 37–42.

27.

Pasebani

Toroghinejad

. Nano-grained 70/30 brass strip produced by accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Mat Sci Eng A 2010; 527: 491–497.

28.

Shaarbaf

Toroghinejad

. Nano-grained copper strip produced by accumulative roll bonding process. Mat Sci Eng A 2008; 473: 28–33.

29.

Kamikawa

Tsuji

Huang

. Through-thickness characterization of microstructure and texture in high purity aluminum processed to high strain by accumulative roll-bonding. Mater Trans 2007; 48: 1978–1985.