Tolerance analysis by static analogy: numerical and experimental results

Abstract

Industrial requirements to design high quality products in shorter and shorter times impose the use of numerical models to estimate the geometrical deviations of these products, which are assemblies, starting from the geometrical deviations of their components. Numerical models may support this estimation activity, thus reducing the time to market and the design costs.

The free-body model is an interesting numerical method to translate the tolerance chain into a static problem solved by algebraic or graphical procedures by using the free-body diagrams of force analysis. This work presents a free-body model that is able to deal with dimensional and geometrical tolerances that involve translations of the features to which the tolerances are applied. Moreover, it validates the free-body model for tolerance analysis of rigid parts by defining and solving a case study through numerical and experimental activities. The present work uses a case study to demonstrate the effectiveness of the free-body model by underlining that the experimental results obtained are very close to those from the numerical model.

Keywords

free-body diagram tolerance analysis rigid parts static analogy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Corrado

Polini

Assembly design in aeronautic field: from assembly jigs to tolerance analysis. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2017; 231: 2652–2663.

Walter

Sprügel

Wartzack

Tolerance analysis of systems in motion taking into account interactions between deviations. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2013; 227(5): 709–719.

Marziale

Polini

Review of variational models for tolerance analysis of an assembly. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2011; 225(3): 305–318.

Desrochers

A CAD/CAM representation model applied to tolerance transfer methods. J Mech Des 2003; 125: 14–22.

Whitney

Gilbert

Jastrzebski

Representation of geometric variations using matrix transforms for statistical tolerance analysis in assemblies. Res Eng Des 1994; 6: 191–210.

Chase

Magleby

Glancy

Tolerance analysis of 2-D and 3-D mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments. Adv Tolerancing Tech 2004; 1: 1869–1873.

Zou

Morse

EP.

A gap-based approach to capture fitting conditions for mechanical assembly. Comput Des 2004; 36: 691–700.

Davidson

Mujezinovic’

Shah

JJ.

A new mathematical model for geometric tolerances as applied to round faces. J Mech Des 2002; 124: 609–622.

Zhang

Liu

Pierre

, et al. Polytope-based tolerance analysis with consideration of form defects and surface deformations. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 2021; 34: 57–75.

10.

Bourdet

Mathieu

Lartigue

, et al. The concept of small displacement torsor in metrology. Ser Adv Math Appl Sci 1996; 40: 110–122.

11.

Corrado

Polini

Manufacturing signature in jacobian and torsor models for tolerance analysis of rigid parts. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 2017; 46: 15–24.

12.

Laperriere

Lafond

Modeling tolerances and dispersions of mechanical assemblies using virtual joints. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Techical Conferences, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 1999.

13.

Zhou

Liu

Qiu

, et al. Three-dimensional tolerance analysis of discrete surface structures based on the torsor cluster model. Assem Autom 2021; 41: 486–500.

14.

Hassani

Khodaygan

Direct tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with normal and non-normal tolerances for predicting product quality. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 2022; 35: 743–760.

15.

Ghie

Laperrière

Desrochers

Statistical tolerance analysis using the unified Jacobian–Torsor model. Int J Prod Res 2010; 48: 4609–4630.

16.

Kang

Z-M

Liu

, et al. A novel method to design tolerance of aero-engine casing by integrating 3-D assembly tolerance with performance instability. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2022; 236: 1052–1070.

17.

Hou

Analysis of assembly tolerance based on assembly constraint information model. Math Probl Eng 2021; 2021: 1–18.

18.

Dantan

J-Y

Eifler

Integrated uncertainty management in parametric design and tolerancing. J Eng Des 2021; 32: 517–537.

19.

Cao

Liu

Yang

A comprehensive review of tolerance analysis models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2018; 97: 3055–3085.

20.

Liu

, et al. A generic integrated approach of assembly tolerance analysis based on skin model shapes. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2021; 235(4): 689–704.

21.

Amirouche

FML

. Fundamentals of Multibody Dynamics. 1st ed. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston, 2006.

22.

Zhang

Liu

Pierre

, et al. Considerations of form defects and surface deformations for tolerance analysis of cylindrical components. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2021; 235: 1447–1457.

23.

Armillotta

Tolerance analysis of gear trains by static analogy. Mech Mach Theory 2019; 135: 65–80.

24.

Bilancia

Berselli

Bruzzone

, et al. A CAD/CAE integration framework for analyzing and designing spatial compliant mechanisms via pseudo-rigid-body methods. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 2019; 56: 287–302.

25.

Polini

Corrado

Geometric tolerance analysis through Jacobian model for rigid assemblies with translational deviations. Assem Autom 2016; 36: 72–79.

26.

Bauchau

Craig

JI.

Virtual work principles. In: Bauchau

Craig

(eds) Structural analysis. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009, pp.395–491.

27.

Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of Measurement Data - Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. JCGM 100, 2008.

28.

McPherson

Applying and Interpreting Statistics: A Comprehensive Guide. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2001.