Flow control effectiveness of synthetic jet on a stalled airfoil

Abstract

Synthetic jet has attracted much attention for its use as an effective active flow control technique. With the aim of achieving a deeper understanding of the mechanisms and the critical fluid flow phenomena associated with synthetic jet, 2D simulations are conducted, in which a synthetic jet is placed on a NACA 0012 airfoil’s upper surface near the leading edge simulating the periodic blowing and suction control at Re = 5 × 10⁵ and an angle of attack of 18°. Important control parameters, such as jet amplitude and frequency are investigated over a wide range and the jet width is also considered. Numerical results show that the recirculation region on the airfoil is decreased with a maximum increase in the lift by about 40 per cent and a reduced drag. The synthetic jet is found to be particularly effective at high forcing levels when the forcing frequency f_e is close to the natural shedding frequency of the airfoil, and however become ineffective at low forcing levels. Use of higher forcing frequencies further decreases the drag of the airfoil but also reduces the lift.

Keywords

synthetic jet flow control forcing frequency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Holman

Utturkar

Mittal

Smith

B. L.

Cattafesta

Formation criterion for synthetic jets. AIAA J., 2005, 43(10), 2110–2116.

Glezer

Amitay

Synthetic jets. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 2002, 34, 503–529.

Seifert

Bachar

Koss

Shepshelovich

Wygnanski

Oscillatory blowing: a tool to delay boundary-layer separation. AIAA J., 1993, 31(11), 2052–2060.

Amitay

Glezer

Role of actuation frequency in controlled flow reattachment over a stalled airfoil. AIAA J., 2002, 40(2), 209–216.

Tuck, A. and Soria, J. Active flow control over a NACA 0015 airfoil using a ZNMF jet. In Proceeding of the 15th Australian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Sydney, Australia, 13–17 December, 2004.

J. Z.

X. Y.

Denny

A. G.

Fan

J. M.

Post-stall flow control on an airfoil by local unsteady forcing. J. Fluid Mech., 1998, 371, 21–58.

Duvigneau

Visonneau

Optimization of a synthetic jet actuator for aerodynamic stall control. Comput. Fluids, 2006, 35, 624–638.

You

Moin

Active control of flow separation over an airfoil. J. Fluids Struct., 2008, 24, 1349–1357.

Raju

Mittal

Cattafesta

Dynamics of airfoil separation control using zero-net mass-flux forcing. AIAA J., 2008, 46(12), 3103–3115.

10.

Menter, F. R. Zonal two equation κ-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. In Proceeding of the 24th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida, 6–9 July, 1993, AIAA Paper No. 93–2906.

11.

Barton

I. E.

Comparison of SIMPLE- and PISO-type algorithms for transient flows. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 1998, 26, 459–483.

12.

Critzos, C. C., Heyson, H. H., and Boswinkle, R. W. Aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 0012 airfoil section at angles of attack from 0° to 180°. NACA TN 3361, January, 1955.

13.

Huang

P. G.

LeBeau

R. P.

Hauser

Numerical study of blowing and suction control mechanism on NACA 0012 airfoil. J. Aircraft, 2004, 41(5), 1005–1013.

14.

Roshko, A. On the drag and shedding frequency of two-dimensional bluff bodies. NACA TN 3169, July, 1954.

15.

Hong

Effectiveness of micro synthetic jet actuator enhanced by flow instability in controlling laminar separation caused by adverse pressure gradient. Sens. Actuators, A, 2006, 132(2), 607–615.

16.

Kim

S. H.

Kim

Separation control on NACA23012 using synthetic jet. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2009, 13, 172–182.

17.

Greenblatt

Wygnanski

I. J.

The control of flow separation by periodic excitation. Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 2000, 36, 487–545.