Reliability analysis of structural system with multiple failure modes and mixed uncertain input variables

Abstract

In the design of engineering structure, uncertainties can be modeled as randomness or fuzziness depending on the amount of information available. In this article, the estimation of failure probability of structural system with multiple failure modes and mixed (random and fuzzy) inputs is considered. We firstly review the addition law of failure probability and a linear programming based bound method, and then these two techniques are combined to deal with structural system with multiple failure modes and only random inputs. Eventually, this method is extended for estimating the membership function of the failure probability of structural system with both random and fuzzy inputs. This method is computationally cheap, especially for the structural system with a large number of failure modes. Several numerical examples are introduced for demonstrating the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method.

Keywords

Structural system reliability fuzzy variable membership function failure probability linear programming

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Helton

Johnson

Oberkampf

. An exploration of alternative approaches to the representation of uncertainty in model predictions. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 2004; 85: 39–71.

Wei P, Lu Z and Tian L. Additional laws of failure probability and their applications in structural system with multiple failure modes. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0954406212442447.

Youn

Wang

. Complementary intersection method for system reliability analysis. J Mech Design 2009; 131: 041004 (15 pp).

Hasofer

Lind

. Exact and invariant second moment code format. J Eng Mech-ASCE 1974; 100: 111–121.

Bucher

. Adaptive sampling—an iterative fast Monte Carlo procedure. Struct Safety 1988; 5: 119–126.

Harbitz

. An efficient sampling method for probability of failure calculation. Struct Safety 1986; 3: 109–115.

Ibrahim

. Observations on applications of importance sampling in structural reliability analysis. Struct Safety 1991; 9: 269–281.

Melchers

. Search-based importance sampling. Struct Safety 1990; 9: 117–128.

Beck

. Important sampling in high dimensions. Struct Safety 2002; 25: 139–163.

10.

Schuëller

Pradlwarter

Koutsourelakis

. A critical appraisal of reliability estimation procedures for high dimensions. Probab Eng Mech 2004; 19: 463–473.

11.

Pradlwarter

Pellissetti

Schenk

. Realistic and efficient reliability estimation for aerospace structures. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2005; 194: 1597–1617.

12.

Pradlwarter

Schuëller

Koutsourelakis

. Application of line sampling simulation method to reliability benchmark problems. Struct Safety 2007; 29: 208–221.

13.

Wei

Tian

. New linear programming-based method for structural system reliability. J Aircraft 2012; 49: 664–670.

14.

Kounias

. Bounds for the probability of a union, with applications. Ann Math Statist 1968; 39: 2154–2158.

15.

Mjelde

. Reliability bounds for series systems. J Struct Mech 1984; 12: 79–85.

16.

Ditlevsen

. Narrow reliability bounds for structural system. J Struct Mech 1979; 7: 453–472.

17.

Zhang

. High-order reliability bounds for series systems and application to structural systems. Comput Struct 1993; 46: 381–386.

18.

Song

Kiureghian

. Bounds on system reliability by linear programming. J Eng Mech-ASCE 2003; 129: 627–636.

19.

Dong

Shah

. Vertex method for computing functions of fuzzy variables. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1987; 24: 65–78.

20.

Penmetsa

Grandhi

. Uncertainty propagation using possibility theory and function approximates. Mech Des Struct Mach 2003; 31: 257–279.

21.

. Unified uncertainty analysis by the first order reliability method. J Mech Des 2008; 130: 091401–1–091401-10.

22.

Venter

Haftka

. Using response surface approximating in fuzzy set based design optimization. Struct Optim 1999; 18: 218–227.

23.

Adduri

Penmetsa

. System reliability analysis for mixed uncertain variables. Struct Safety 2009; 31: 375–382.

24.

Medasani

Kim

Krishnapuram

. An overview of membership function generation techniques for pattern recognition. Int J Approx Reason 1998; 19: 391–417.

25.

Wei

Hao

. importance measure analysis in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. J Aircraft 2011; 48: 1733–1740.