Evaluating the time-varying mesh stiffness of a planetary gear set using the potential energy method

Abstract

Time-varying mesh stiffness is a periodic function caused by the change in the number of contact tooth pairs and the contact positions of the gear teeth. It is one of the main sources of vibration of a gear transmission system. An efficient and effective way to evaluate the time-varying mesh stiffness is essential to comprehensively understand the dynamic properties of a planetary gear set. According to the literature, there are two ways to evaluate the gear mesh stiffness, the finite element method and the analytical method. The finite element method is time-consuming because one needs to model every meshing gear pair in order to know the mesh stiffness of a range of gear pairs. On the other hand, analytical method can offer a general approach to evaluate the mesh stiffness. In this study, the potential energy method is applied to evaluate the time-varying mesh stiffness of a planetary gear set. Analytical equations are derived without any modification of the gear tooth involute curve. The developed equations are applicable to any transmission structure of a planetary gear set. Detailed discussions are given to three commonly used transmission structures: fixed carrier, fixed ring gear and fixed sun gear.

Keywords

Mesh stiffness potential energy method planetary gear set mesh phasing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chaari

Fakhfakh

Haddar

. Dynamic analysis of a planetary gear failure caused by tooth pitting and cracking. J Fail Anal Prev 2006; 6: 73–78.

Lin

Parker

. Mesh stiffness variation instability in two-stage gear systems. Trans ASME J Vib Acoust 2002; 124: 68–76.

Wang

Howard

. The torsional stiffness of involute spur gears. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 2004; 218: 131–142.

Meagher J, Wu X, Kong D, et al. A comparison of gear mesh stiffness modeling strategies. In: Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series 12, Jacksonville, FL, USA, 1–4 February 2010, pp. 255–263.

Jia

Howard

. Comparison of localized spalling and crack damage from dynamic modeling of spur gear vibrations. Mech Syst Signal Process 2006; 20: 332–349.

Pandya

Parey

. Failure path based modified gear mesh stiffness for spur gear pair with tooth root crack. Eng Fail Anal 2013; 27: 286–296.

Song

Zhu

Liu

. Mesh characteristics for marine beveloid gears with crossed axes. J Xian Jiaotong Univ 2012; 46: 64–69.

Chaari

Fakhfakh

Haddar

. Analytical modeling of spur gear tooth crack and influence on gearmesh stiffness. Eur J Mech A-Solid 2009; 28: 461–468.

Zhou

Shao

Lei

. Time-varying meshing stiffness calculation and vibration analysis for a 16DOF dynamic model with linear crack growth in a pinion. J Vib Acoust 2012; 134: 1–11.

10.

Chaari

Baccar

Abbes

. Effect of spalling or tooth breakage on gearmesh stiffness and dynamic response of a one-stage spur gear transmission. Eur J Mech A-Solid 2008; 27: 691–705.

11.

Kasuba

Evans

. An extended model for determining dynamic loads in spur gearing. J Mech Des 1981; 103: 398–409.

12.

Pintz A, Kasuba R, Frater JL, et al. Dynamic effects of internal spur gear drives. NASA Contractor Report. Report no. 3692, 1983.

13.

Yang

DCH

Sun

. A rotary model for spur gear dynamics. ASME J Mech Transm Automat Des 1985; 107: 529–535.

14.

Yang

DCH

Lin

. Hertzian damping, tooth friction and bending elasticity in gear impact dynamics. ASME J Mech Transm Automat Des 1987; 109: 189–196.

15.

Tian X, Zuo MJ and Fyfe KR. Analysis of the vibration response of a gearbox with gear tooth faults. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Anaheim, CA, USA, 13–20 November 2004, pp. 4–10.

16.

Chen

Shao

. Dynamic simulation of spur gear with tooth root crack propagating along tooth width and crack depth. Eng Fail Anal 2011; 18: 2149–2164.

17.

AI-Shyyab

Kahraman

. A non-linear dynamic model for planetary gear sets. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics 2007; 221: 567–576.

18.

Woohyung

Yeong

Jintai

. Dynamic analysis for a planetary gear with time-varying pressure angles and contract ratios. J Sound Vib 2012; 331: 883–901.

19.

Liang X, Zuo MJ and Guo Y. Evaluating time-varying mesh stiffness of planetary gear set using potential energy method. In: Proceedings of 7th world congress on engineering asset management, Daejeon, Korea, 8–10 October 2012.

20.

Tian X. Dynamic simulation for system response of gearbox including localized gear faults. MS Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Canada, 2004.

21.

Huang

Liu

. Elasticity and application, Beijing: China Machine Press, 1983, pp. 183–183.

22.

Parker

Lin

. Mesh phasing relationships in planetary and epicyclic gears. J Mech Des 2004; 126: 365–370.

23.

Kahraman

. Load sharing characteristics of planetary transmissions. Mech Mach Theory 1994; 29: 1151–1165.

24.

Tian T. Evaluating the mesh stiffness of a planetary gear structure with the sun gear having a tooth crack. MS Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Canada, 2013.

25.

ANSYS Inc. Structural Analysis Guide, Release 12.1, 2009.