The joining techniques of lightweight and strong materials in the transport industry (e.g. automotive, aerospace, shipbuilding industries) are very important for the safety of the entire structure. In these industries, when compared with other joining methods, the use of adhesively bonded joints presents unique properties such as greater strength, design flexibility, and reduction in fuel consumption, all thanks to low weight. The aim of this study was the analysis of the tensile fatigue behavior of adhesively bonded glass fiber/epoxy laminated composite single-lap joints with three different specimen types including 30, 40 and 50 mm overlap lengths. In this study, composite adherents were manufactured via vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding and were bonded using Loctite 9461 A&B toughened epoxy adhesive. The effect of a surface treatment method on the bonding strength was considered and it led to an increment of about 40%. A numerical analysis based on a finite element model was performed to predict fatigue life curve, and the predicted results showed good agreement with the experimental investigation.
SarfarazRVassilopoulosAPKellerT. Experimental investigation and modeling of mean load effect on fatigue behavior of adhesively-bonded pultruded GFRP joints. Int J Fatigue2012; 44: 245–252.
OwensJFPLee-SullivanP. Stiffness behaviour due to fracture in adhesively bonded composite-to aluminium joints II Experimental. Int J Adhes Adhes2000; 20(1): 47–58.
7.
RisplerARTongLStevenGP. Shape optimisation of adhesive fillets. Int J Adhes Adhes2000; 20(3): 221–231.
8.
YouMYanZ-MZhengX-L. A numerical and experimental study of adhesively bonded aluminium single lap joints with an inner chamfer on the adherends. Int J Adhes Adhes2008; 28: 71–76.
9.
YouMLiZZhengX-L. A numerical and experimental study of preformed angle in the lap zone on adhesively bonded steel single lap joint. Int J Adhes Adhes2009; 29: 280–285.
10.
GrantLDRAdamsRDda SilvaLFM. Experimental and numerical analysis of single-lap joints for the automotive industry. Int J Adhes Adhes2009; 29: 405–413.
11.
LoureiroALda SilvaLFMSatoC. Comparison of the mechanical behaviour between stiff and flexible adhesive joints for the automotive industry. J Adhes2010; 86: 765–787.
FerreiraJAMReisPNCostaJDM. Fatigue behaviour of composite adhesive lap joints. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1373–1379.
14.
TangJHSridharISrikanthN. Static and fatigue failure analysis of adhesively bonded thick composite single lap joints. Compos Sci Technol2013; 86: 18–25.
15.
SaymanOArikanVDoganA. Failure analysis of adhesively bonded composite joints under transverse impact and different temperatures. Compos Part B: Eng2013; 54: 409–414.
16.
GrantLDRAdamsRDda SilvaLFM. Experimental and numerical analysis of T-peel joints for the automotive industry. J Adhes Sci Technol2009; 23: 317–338.
17.
GrantLDRAdamsRDda SilvaLFM. Experimental and numerical analysis of clinch (hemflange) joints used in the automotive industry. J Adhes Sci Technol2009; 23: 1673–1688.
18.
GleichDMVan ToorenMJLBeukersA. Analysis and evaluation of bondline thickness effects on failure load in adhesively bonded structures. J Adhes Sci Technol2001; 15: 1091–1101.
19.
van ToorenMJLGleichDMBeukersA. Experimental verification of a stress singularity model to predict the effect of bondline thickness on joint strength. J Adhes Sci Technol2004; 18: 395–412.
20.
RentonWJVinsonJR. Fatigue behavior of bonded joints in composite material structures. J Aircraft1975; 12: 442–447.
21.
RentonWJVinsonJR. The efficient design of adhesive bonded joints. J Adhes1975; 7: 175–193.
22.
KinlochAJ. Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology, 1st ed. London: Chapman and Hall, 1986.
23.
AlfanoMLubineauGFurgiueleF. Study on the role of laser surface irradiation on damage and decohesion of Al/epoxy joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2012; 39: 33–41.
Chihara KY and Melby EG. Treatment of FRP surfaces for bonding. Patent 4745018, USA, 1988.
26.
MortensenFThomsenOT. Analysis of adhesive bonded joints: a unified approach. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1011–1031.
27.
ZouGPShahinKTaheriF. An analytical solution for the analysis of symmetric composite adhesively bonded joints. Compos Struct2004; 65: 499–510.
28.
SuYYGaoXL. Analytical model for adhesively bonded composite panel-flange joints based on the Timoshenko beam theory. Compos Struct2014; 107: 112–118.
29.
RoySReddyJN. A finite element analysis of adhesively bonded composite joints with moisture diffusion and delayed failure. Comput Struct1988; 29: 1011–1031.
30.
TongLSheppardAKellyD. A numerical study of adhesively bonded composite panel-flange joints. Compos Struct1994; 28: 449–458.
31.
RichardsonGCrocombeADSmithPA. A comparison of two- and three-dimensional finite element analyses of adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes1993; 13: 193–200.
32.
HuPHanXda SilvaLFM. Strength prediction of adhesively bonded joints under cyclic thermal loading using a cohesive zone model. Int J Adhes Adhes2013; 41: 6–15.
33.
de MouraMFSFGonçalvesJPM. Development of a cohesive zone model for fatigue/fracture characterization of composite bonded joints under mode II loading. Int J Adhes Adhes2014; 54: 224–230.
34.
de MouraMFSFGonçalvesJPM. Cohesive zone model for high-cycle fatigue of adhesively bonded joints under mode I loading. Int J Solids Struct2014; 51: 1123–1131.
35.
AlfanoMFurgiueleFLeonardiA. Mode I fracture of adhesive joints using tailored cohesive zone models. Int J Fract2008; 157: 193–204.
36.
ParkKPaulinoGH. Computational implementation of the PPR potential-based cohesive model in ABAQUS: educational perspective. Eng Fract Mech2012; 93: 239–262.
37.
AlfanoMFurgiueleFLubineauG. Simulation of debonding in Al/epoxy T-peel joints using a potential-based cohesive zone model. Procedia Eng2011; 10: 1760–1765.
38.
YangQDThoulessMDWardSM. Numerical simulations of adhesively-bonded beams failing with extensive plastic deformation. J Mech Phys Solids1999; 47: 1337–1353.
