The application of guided-wave ultrasonic testing in structural health monitoring has been widely accepted. Comprehensive experimental works have been performed in the past but their validation with possible analytical and numerical solutions still requires serious efforts. In this paper, behavior and detection of the Gaussian-modulated sinusoidal guided-wave pulse traveling in an aluminum plate are presented. An analytical solution is derived for sensing guided wave at a given distance from the actuator. This solution can predict the primary wave modes separately. Numerical analysis is also carried out in COMSOL® Multiphysics software. An experimental setup comprising piezoelectric transducers is used for the validation. Comparison of experimental results with those obtained from analytical and numerical solutions shows close agreement.
RaghavanACesnikCE. Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring. Shock Vib Dig2007; 39: 91–116.
2.
GiurgiutiuV. Structural health monitoring with piezoelectrical wafer active sensors, Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 2007.
3.
De Villa F, Roldan E, Tirado C, et al. Defect detection in thin plates using So Lamb wave scanning. In: The 6th annual international symposium on NDE for Health Monitoring and Diagnostics, 2001, pp.121–130.
4.
LoweMJSAlleyneDNCawleyP. The mode conversion of a guided wave by a part-circumferential notch in a pipe. J Appl Mech1998; 65: 649–656.
5.
Kessler SS, Spearing SM and Atalla MJ. In-situ damage detection of composites structures using Lamb wave methods. In: Proceedings of the first European workshop on structural health monitoring, 2002, pp.10–12.
6.
De MarchiLMarzaniAMiniaciM. A dispersion compensation procedure to extend pulse-echo defects location to irregular waveguides. NDT E Int2013; 54: 115–122.
7.
GiurgiutiuVBaoJZhaoW. Piezoelectric wafer active sensor embedded ultrasonics in beams and plates. Exp Mech2003; 43: 428–449.
8.
MoserFJacobsLJQuJ. Modeling elastic wave propagation in waveguides with the finite element method. NDT E Int1999; 32: 225–234.
9.
CawleyPLoweMJSAlleyneDNet al.Practical long range guided wave inspection-applications to pipes and rail. Mater Eval2003; 61: 66–74.
10.
CawleyPAlleyneD. The use of Lamb waves for the long range inspection of large structures. Proc Ultrason Int1995; 34: 287–290.
11.
HayTRRoseJL. Flexible PVDF comb transducers for excitation of axisymmetric guided waves in pipe. Sens Actuat Phys2002; 100: 18–23.
12.
LoweMJSAlleyneDNCawleyP. Defect detection in pipes using guided waves. Ultrason Int1997; 36: 147–154.
13.
MuJZhangLRoseJL. Defect circumferential sizing by using long range ultrasonic guided wave focusing techniques in pipe. Nondestruct Test Eval2007; 22: 239–253.
14.
PeiJYousufMIDegertekinFLet al.Lamb wave tomography and its application in pipe erosion/corrosion monitoring. Res Nondestruct Eval1996; 8: 189–197.
15.
RoseJL. Ultrasonic waves in solid media, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
16.
ViktorovIA. Rayleigh and Lamb waves: Physical theory and applications, New York: Plenum Press, 1967.
17.
Lanza di ScaleaFRizzoPMarzaniA. Propagation of ultrasonic guided waves in lap-shear adhesive joints: Case of incident a0 Lamb wave. J Acoust Soc Am2004; 115: 146–156.
18.
Lanza di ScaleaFMattHBartoliI. The response of rectangular piezoelectric sensors to Rayleigh and Lamb ultrasonic waves. J Acoust Soc Am2007; 121: 175–187.
19.
RizzoPCammarataMBartoliIet al.Ultrasonic guided waves-based monitoring of rail head: Laboratory and field tests. Adv Civ Eng2010; 2010: 13–13.
20.
CocciaSPhillipsRBartoliIet al.Noncontact ultrasonic guided-wave system for rail inspection. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board2011; 2261: 143–147.
21.
LiuGQuJ. Transient wave propagation in a circular annulus subjected to transient excitation on its outer surface. J Acoust Soc Am1998; 104: 1210–1220.
22.
ZiajaAChengLSuZet al.Thick hollow cylindrical waveguides: A theoretical, numerical and experimental study. J Sound Vib2015; 350: 73–90.
23.
BeardMDLoweMJS. Non-destructive testing of rock bolts using guided ultrasonic waves. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci2003; 40: 527–536.
24.
Giurgiutiu V. Lamb wave generation with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. In: SPIE’s 10th annual international symposium on smart structures and materials and 8th annual international symposium on NDE for health monitoring and diagnostics, San Diego, CA, 2–6 March 2002, paper # 5056-17.
25.
StaszewskiWJLeeBCMalletLet al.Structural health monitoring using scanning laser vibrometry: I. Lamb wave sensing. Smart Mater Struct2004; 13: 251–251.
26.
ZhangH-YYuJ-B. Piezoelectric transducer parameter selection for exciting a single mode from multiple modes of Lamb waves. Chin Phys B2011; 20: 094301–094301.
27.
Frank PaiPDengHSundaresanMJ. Time-frequency characterization of Lamb waves for material evaluation and damage inspection of plates. Mech Syst Signal Process2015; 62–63: 183–206.
28.
NieuwenhuisJNJHGreveIJODW. Generation and detection of guided waves using PZT wafer transducers. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control2005; 52: 2103–2111.
29.
RaišutisRKažysRŽukauskasEet al.Application of ultrasonic guided waves for non-destructive testing of defective CFRP rods with multiple delaminations. NDT E Int2010; 43: 416–424.
30.
de PodestaM. Understanding the properties of matter, 2nd ed. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2002.
31.
GiurgiutiuVZagraiAN. Characterization of piezoelectric wafer active sensors. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2000; 11: 959–976.
