Computational fluid dynamics and experimental analysis of the influence of the energy recovery unit on the proportional relief valve

Abstract

The overflow energy loss in relief valve, which is one of the main reasons leading to the low efficiency of the hydraulic system, had been considered to be impossible to solve. The principle of the overflow energy loss of the relief valve is analyzed and a novel method to reduce the overflow loss using an energy recovery unit, which can improve the return line pressure of the pilot proportional relief valve, is proposed. The influence of the energy recovery unit on the pressure control characteristics and steady-state flow force of the pilot proportional relief valve are discussed. The effects of the return line pressure on the distribution of the flow field and the pressure control characteristics are analyzed through computational fluid dynamics simulation and experiment. The results show that with the increase of the return line pressure, the displacement of the main valve spool increases and the reset spring force increases accordingly. While the steady-state flow force decreases dramatically with the increase of the return line pressure, which results in a smaller pressure differential the pressure differential can be reduced from 15% to 2.5%. It is also observed that the flow rate of the pilot proportional relief valve can be maintained at a certain value with a small oscillation and that the pilot proportional relief valve can release the redundant flow of hydraulic system. This verifies that the pilot proportional relief valve with the outlet connecting to the energy recovery unit to recovery the overflow energy loss cannot reduce the pressure control characteristics, but can achieve a better pressure control accuracy of the pilot proportional relief valve.

Keywords

Relief valve computational fluid dynamics overflow loss energy recovery steady-state flow force pressure differential

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chen

Liu

et al.

Research on pump control signal of excavator positive control system. J Hefei Univ Technol 2014; 37: 645–649.

Cheng M, Xu B and Yang H. Efficiency improvement for electrohydraulic flow sharing systems. In: 9th international fluid power conference, Aachen, Germany, 2014.

Sugimura K and Murrenhoff HS. Hybrid load sensing-displacement controlled architecture for excavators. In: 14th Scandinavian international conference on fluid power (SICFP'15), Tampere, Finland, 2015.

Pettersson H, Krus P, Jansson A, et al. The design of pressure compensators for load sensing hydraulic systems. In: UKACC international conference on Control’96, Exeter, UK, 1996, pp.1456–1461.

Jansson A and Palmberg JO. Separate controls of meter-in and meter-out orifices in mobile hydraulic systems. SAE Technical Paper, 1990.

Pedersen HC, Andersen TO, Skouboe T, et al. Investigation and comparison of separate meter-in separate meter-out control strategies. In: ASME/BATH 2013 symposium on fluid power and motion control. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013, pp.V001T01A047–V001T01A047.

Quan

Zhang

. Review of energy efficient direct pump controlled cylinder electro-hydraulic technology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014; 35: 336–346.

Ren

Lin

Huang

et al.

Characteristics of energy regeneration and reutilization system during the acceleration stage of the swing for hydraulic excavator. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0954407016670275.

Bazsó

Hős

. An experimental study on the stability of a direct spring loaded poppet relief valve. J Fluids Struct 2013; 42: 456–465.

10.

Beune

Kuerten

JGM

van Heumen

MPC

. CFD analysis with fluid–structure interaction of opening high-pressure safety valves. Comput Fluid 2012; 64: 108–116.

11.

Hos

Champneys

. Grazing bifurcations and chatter in a pressure relief valve model. Phys D: Nonlin Phenom 2011; 22: 2068–2076.

12.

Kumagai K, Ryu S, Kazuo M, et al. Renewed study of vibration phenomenon in poppet type valve. In: 9th international fluid power conference, Aachen, Germany, 2014.

13.

Min

Yang

. Axial vibration in a poppet valve based on fluid–structure interaction. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 2015; 229: 3266–3273.

14.

Lin T, Chen Q, Miao C, et al. A system to recovery and recuse the overflow loss of the relief valve. Chinese Patent, 201610297144.7.

15.

Guo

Xie

Liu

et al.

Research and structure analysis of the flow force of the slide valve based on FLUENT. Construct Machine Dig 2011; 6: 50–54.

16.

. Electro-hydraulic proportional control technology, Beijing: China Machine Press, 1988, pp. 224–226.

17.

Yang

. Study on steady flow force of non-circular opening spool valve. Chin J Mech Eng 2003; 39: 13–17.

18.

Lisowski

Czyżycki

Rajda

. Three dimensional CFD analysis and experimental test of flow force acting on the spool of solenoid operated directional control valve. Energy Convers Manage 2013; 70: 220–229.

19.

Yuan

. Using steady flow force for unstable valve design: Modeling and experiments. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 2005; 127: 451–462.

20.

Simic

Herakovic

. Reduction of the flow forces in a small hydraulic seat valve as alternative approach to improve the valve characteristics. Energy Convers Manage 2015; 89: 708–718.