This study considers flow through the gap left between two surfaces during unloading, in other words, when an applied load is gradually reduced after loading to a state where plastic deformation occurs. In particular, the permeability of the gap is studied. It was found that a substantial reduction of the applied load is required before the permeability starts to increase significantly. The explanation for this phenomenon is given by the combination of components with different wavelengths present in the surface. Components with long wavelengths deform elastically and those with shorter wavelengths may also deform plastically. We found that plastic deformation acts to keep the permeability nearly constant at the beginning of the unloading and elastic spring-back is responsible for the rapid increase at lower loads. This principle constitutes a basis for the strategy that was developed in order to predict the load at which the rapid increase of permeability starts.
KadinYKligermanYEtsionI. Unloading an elastic-plastic contact of rough surfaces. J Mech Phys Solid2006; 54(12): 2652–2674.
2.
MurtagianGRFanelliVVillasanteJAet al.Sealability of stationary metal-to-metal seals. J Tribol2004; 126(3): 591–596.
3.
ZaitYKligermanYEtsionI. Unloading of an elastic-plastic spherical contact under stick contact condition. Int J Solid Struct2010; 47(7–8): 990–997.
4.
GreenwoodJAWilliamsonJBP. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond A1966; 295: 300–319.
5.
JonesRE. Models for contact loading and unloading of a rough surface. Int J Eng Sci2004; 42(17–18): 1931–1947.
6.
ZhaoBZhangSWangPet al.Loading-unloading normal stiffness model for power-law hardening surfaces considering actual surface topography. Tribol Int2015; 90: 332–342.
7.
JohnsonKL. Contact mechanics, Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1985.
8.
EtsionI. State of the art in laser surface texturing. J Tribol2005; 127(1): 248–253.
9.
BrizmerVKligermanYEtsionI. The effect of contact conditions and material properties on the elasticity terminus of a spherical contact. Int J Solid Struct2006; 43(18–19): 5736–5749.
10.
PeiLHyunSMolinariJFet al.Finite element modeling of elasto-plastic contact between rough surfaces. J Mech Phys Solid2005; 53(11): 2385–2409.
11.
Liu H, Leray D, Colin S, et al. Finite element based surface roughness study for ohmic contact of microswitches. In: Proceedings of the annual Holm conference on electrical contacts, 2012.
12.
OvcharenkoAHalperinGVerberneGet al.In situ investigation of the contact area in elastic-plastic spherical contact during loading-unloading. Tribol Lett2007; 25(2): 153–160.
13.
JamariJSchipperDJ. Deterministic repeated contact of rough surfaces. Wear2008; 264(3–4): 349–358.
14.
ChatterjeeBSahooP. Effect of strain hardening on unloading of a deformable sphere loaded against a rigid flat – a finite element study. Int J Eng Tech2010; 2(4): 225–233.
15.
ZhaoBZhangSWangQFet al.Loading and unloading of a power-law hardening spherical contact under stick contact condition. Int J Mech Sci2015; 94–95: 20–26.
16.
Pérez-RàfolsFLarssonRAlmqvistA. Modelling of leakage on metal-to-metal seals. Tribol Int2016; 94: 421–427.
17.
DappWBLükeAPerssonBNJet al.Self-affine elastic contacts: Percolation and leakage. Phys Rev Lett2012; 108(24): ). Article number 244301.
18.
DappWBMüserMH. Fluid leakage near the percolation threshold. Sci Rep2016; 6. Article number 19513.
GaoYFBowerAFKimK-Set al.The behavior of an elastic-perfectly plastic sinusoidal surface under contact loading. Wear2006; 261(2): 145–154.
21.
LiuM. Finite element analysis of large contact deformation of an elastic-plastic sinusoidal asperity and a rigid flat. Int J Solid Struct2014; 51(21–22): 3642–3652.
22.
MannersW. Plastic deformation of a sinusoidal surface. Wear2008; 264(1–2): 60–68.
23.
SunFVan der GiessenENicolaL. Plastic flattening of a sinusoidal metal surface: A discrete dislocation plasticity study. Wear2012; 296: 672–680.
24.
JohnsonKLGreenwoodJAHigginsonJG. The contact of elastic regular wavy surfaces. Int J Mech Sci1985; 27(6): 383–396.
25.
RostamiAJacksonRL. Predictions of the average surface separation and stiffness between contacting elastic and elastic-plastic sinusoidal surfaces. Proc IMechE Part J: J Eng Tribol2013; 227(12): 1376–1385.
26.
XuYRostamiAJacksonRL. Elastic contact between a geometrically anisotropic bisinusoidal surface and a rigid base. Int J Mech Sci2015; 137(2): 021402–021410–021402–021410.
27.
YastrebovVAAnciauxGMolinariJ-F. The contact of elastic regular wavy surfaces revisited. Tribol Lett2014; 56(1): 171–183.
28.
ClavarellaMDemelioGBarberJRet al.Linear elastic contact of the Weierstrass profile. Proc R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci2000; 456(1994): 387–405.
29.
GaoY-FBowerAF. Elastic-plastic contact of a rough surface with Weierstrass profile. Proc R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci2006; 462(2065): 319–348.
30.
SahlinFLarssonRAlmqvistAet al.A mixed lubrication model incorporating measured surface topography. Part 1: Theory of flow factors. Proc IMechE Part J: J Eng Tribol2010; 224(4): 335–351.
31.
ReynoldsO. On the theory of lubrication and its application of Mr. Beauchamp Tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil. Phil Trans R Soc London Ser A1886; 177: 157–234.
32.
EtsionIKligermanYKadinY. Unloading of an elastic-plastic loaded spherical contact. Int J Solid Struct2005; 42(13): 3716–3729.
33.
PerssonBNJ. On the fractal dimension of rough surfaces. NanoSci Tech2015; 31: 235–248.
