Symmetric V-shaped riblets are simulated by using the computational fluid dynamic method to understand the riblet effects on the turbulent boundary layer and the skin friction reduction. Three classical turbulence models, namely Spalart–Allmaras, shear stress transport, and re-normalization group k-epsilon models, are investigated under different grid densities. The re-normalization group model produces good results consistent with the experiment, as compared with the existing theoretical and experimental drag results of the flat plate and the V-shaped riblets with different sizes. Simulating V-shaped riblets yield the unexpected discovery that the shear stress transport model produces large errors, and the Spalart–Allmaras model even produces results of qualitative errors. Another finding is that von Kármán’s constants can no longer meet the requirement of describing velocity profiles in the logarithmic law layer. Aside from the traditional shift of the logarithmic law’s intercept, the slope is also changed by riblet height and spacing. Therefore, an improved model of riblet effects is proposed by redefining von Kármán’s constants.
SongYRenXGuCet al.Experimental and numerical studies of cavitation effects in a tapered land thrust bearing. J Tribol – Transact ASME2015; 137: 1–9.
2.
Huang DG and Li XS. Rotordynamic characteristics of a rotor with labyrinth gas seals. Part 1: comparison with Childs’ experiments. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2004, 218(A3): 171-177.
3.
HuangDGLiXS. Rotordynamic characteristics of a rotor with labyrinth gas seals. Part 2: a non-linear model. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2004; 218: 179–185.
4.
ZhangDYLuoYHLiXet al.Numerical simulation and experimental on drag reduction surface of a real shark skin. J Hydrodynam2011; 23: 204–211.
5.
DeanBBhushanB. Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review. Philos Transact Royal Soc A2010; 368: 4775–4806.
6.
Reif WE and Dinkelacker A. Hydrodynamic of the squamation in fast swimming sharks. Aeues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie, 1982, Abhandlungen 164: 184-187.
7.
Bechert DW, Hoppe G and Reif WE. On the drag reductin of the shark skin. In: AIAA Shear Flow Control Conference, paper No. AIAA-85-0546, Boulder, Colorado, 12–14 March 1985, pp.1–18.
8.
LeeSJYangYG. Control of flow around a NACA0012 airfoil with a micro-riblet film. J Fluid Struct2005; 20: 659–672.
9.
VijiapurapuSCuiJ. Simulation of turbulent flow in a ribbed pipe using large eddy simulation. Num Heat Transf Part A2007; 51: 1137–1165.
10.
Arndt R, Chamorro LP and Sotiropolos F. Drag reduction in large wind turbines through riblets: evaluation of different geometries. In: 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting include the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, 9–12 January 2012.
11.
Walsh MJ. Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction using riblets; Riblets as a viscous drag reduction technique. In: AIAA 20th aerospace sciences meeting, Orlando, FL, 11–14 January 1982.
12.
Walsh MJ and Lindemann AM. Optimization and application of riblets for turbulent drag reduction. In: AIAA 22nd aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, NV, 9–12 January 1984.
13.
BechertDWBruseMHageWet al.Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry. J Fluid Mech1997; 338: 59–87.
14.
ParkSRWallaceJM. Flow alteration and drag reduction by riblets in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J1994; 32: 31–38.
15.
ChoiHMoinPKimJ. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets. J Fluid Mech1993; 255: 503–539.
16.
PollardATullisSWangXet al.Simulating turbulent flow over thin element and flat valley V-shaped riblets. AIAA J1996; 34: 2261–2268.
17.
YangKS. Large eddy simulation of turbulent flows in periodically grooved channel. J Wind Eng Indus Aerodynam2000; 84: 47–64.
18.
CuiJPatelVCLinCL. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in a channel with rib roughness. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2003; 24: 372–388.
19.
Peet Y, Sagaut P and Charron Y. Turbulent drag reduction using sinusoidal riblets with triangular cross-section. In: AIAA 38th fluid dynamic conference and exhibit, Seattle, WA, 23–26 June 2008.
20.
LaunderBELiSP. On the prediction of riblet performance with engineering turbulence model. J Appl Scient Res1993; 50: 283–298.
21.
BenhamzaMEBelaidF. Computation of turbulent channel flow with variable spacing riblets. Mechanike2009; 5: 1392–1207.
22.
TainLMRenLQLiuQQet al.The mechanism of drag reduction around bodies of revolution using bionic non-smooth surface. J Bionic Eng2007; 4: 109–116.
23.
Bacher E and Smith C. A combined visualization-anemometry study of the turbulent drag reducing mechanisms of triangular micro-groove surface modification. In: AIAA Shear Flow Control Conference, paper No. AIAA-85-0548, Boulder, Colorado, 12–14 March 1985, pp.1–10.
24.
BechertDWBartenwerferM. The viscous flow on surfaces with longitudinal ribs. J Fluid Mech1989; 206: 105–129.
25.
PanJZ. Experimental exploration on the new concept of turbulent drag reduction. J Aerodynam1996; 14: 304–310.
26.
BoomsmaASotiropoulosF. Riblet drag reduction in mild adverse pressure gradients: a numerical investigation. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2015; 56: 251–260.
27.
MartinSBhushanB. Fluid flow analysis of continuous and segmented riblet structures. Royal Soc Chem2016; 6: 10962–10978.
28.
Sawyer GW and Winter KG. An investigation of the effect on turbulent skin friction of surfaces with streamwise grooves. In: Proceedings Royal Aeronautical Society International Conference on Turbulent Drag Reduction By Passive Means, Vol. 2, London, England, 15–17 September 1987, pp.330–362.
29.
TaniI. Drag reduction by riblet viewed as roughness problem. Proc Japan Acad1988; 64: 21–21.
30.
AupoixBPailhasGHoudevilleR. Toward a general strategy to model riblet effects. AIAA J2012; 50: 708–716.
31.
MayoralRGJiménezJ. Drag reduction by riblets. Philos Transact Royal Soc A2011; 369: 1412–1427.
32.
LiXS. Uniform algorithm for all-speed shock-capturing schemes. Int J Comput Fluid Dynam2014; 28: 329–338.
33.
LiXSLiXL. All-speed Roe scheme for the large eddy simulation of homogeneous decaying turbulence. Int J Comput Fluid Dynam2016; 30: 69–78.
34.
HuangDG. Unified computation of flow with compressible and incompressible fluid based on Roe’s scheme. Appl Math Mech2006; 27: 757–763.
35.
HuangDG. Preconditioned dual-time procedures and its application to simulating the flow with cavitations. J Comput Phys2007; 223: 685–689.
36.
HuangDGKeHYDuJY. A set of new general unified fluid dynamic equations for arbitrary equation of state. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2008; 222: 955–958.
37.
SuXRSasakiDNakahashiK. Cartesian mesh with a novel hybrid WENO/meshless method for turbulent flow calculations. Comput Fluid2013; 84: 69–86.
38.
SuXRYamamotoSNakahashiK. Analysis of a meshless solver for high Reynolds number flow. Int J Num Meth Fluid2013; 72: 505–527.
39.
Su XR, Yamamoto S and Yuan X. On the accurate prediction of tip vortex: effect of numerical schemes. In: ASME Turbo Expo GT2013-94660, San Antonio, TX, 3–7 June 2013.
40.
RenXXuKShyyW. A multi-dimensional high-order DG-ALE method based on gas-kinetic theory with application to oscillating bodies. J Comput Phys2016; 316: 700–720.
41.
RenXGuC. Application of a discontinuous Galerkin method on the compressible flow in the transonic axial compressor. Appl Therm Eng2016; 93: 707–717.
42.
RenXXuKShyyWet al.A multi-dimensional high-order discontinuous Galerkin method based on gas kinetic theory for viscous flow computations. J Comput Phys2015; 292: 176–193.
