Issues in validation of pre-sliding friction models for ultra-high precision positioning

Abstract

Friction is one of the main disturbances in nanometric positioning. Recently, it was shown that ultra-high precision positioning typically happens in the pre-sliding motion regime where friction is characterized by an elasto-plastic nonlinear hysteretic behavior with a marked stochastic variability. With the aim of providing the tools for the development of robust control typologies for ultra-high precision mechatronics devices, different pre-sliding friction models are thus considered in this work. The most relevant ones are hence experimentally validated, as well as compared in terms of the complexity of identifying their characteristic parameters and of simulating the factual dynamic response. It is hence shown that the generalized Maxwell-slip model can account for all the important pre-sliding frictional effects in nanometric positioning applications. A thorough sensitivity analysis of the parameters of the generalized Maxwell-slip model model is therefore performed allowing to establish that three Maxwell-slip blocks are the minimum needed to approximate the behavior of the real precision positioning systems, six blocks allow representing excellently the real behavior, while the slower dynamics, which induces a difficult real-time implementation, with a very limited gain in terms of model accuracy, does not justify the usage of a larger number of elements.

Keywords

Pre-sliding friction identification of parameters modeling validation sensitivity analysis precision engineering

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Schmidt

Schitter

Rankers

et al.

The design of high performance mechatronics – high-tech functionality by multidisciplinary system integration, 2nd ed. Delft: Delft University Press, 2014.

Bhushan

. Springer handbook of nanotechnology, 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer, 2010.

Slocum

. Precision machine design, Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1992.

Zelenika

Kamenar

. Precizne konstrukcije i tehnologija mikro- i nanosustava I – Precizne konstrukcije, Croatia: University of Rijeka, 2015.

Armstrong-Helouvry

Dupont

Canudas de Wit

. A survey of models, analysis tools and compensation methods for the control of machines with friction. Automatica 1994; 30: 1083–1138.

Al-Bender

Lampaert

Swevers

. The generalized Maxwell-slip model: A novel model for friction simulation and compensation. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2005; 50: 1883–1887.

Kamenar

Zelenika

. Nanometric positioning accuracy in the presence of presliding and sliding friction: Modelling, identification and compensation. Mech Based Des Struct 2017; 45: 111–126.

Marques

Flores

Pimenta Claro

et al.

A survey and comparison of several friction force models for dynamic analysis of multibody mechanical systems. Nonlinear Dyn 2016; 86: 1407–1443.

Worden

Wong

Parlitz

et al.

Identification of pre-sliding and sliding friction dynamics: Grey box and black-box models. Mech Syst Signal Process 2007; 21: 514–534.

10.

Courtney-Pratt

Eisner

. The effect of a tangential force on the contact of metallic bodies. Proc Roy Soc A-Math Phys 1957; 238: 529–550.

11.

Al-Bender

De Moerlooze

. Characterization and modeling of friction and wear: An overview. Int J Sustain Constr Des 2011; 2: 19–28.

12.

Ruderman

Bertram

. Two-state dynamic friction model with elasto-plasticity. Mech Syst Signal Process 2013; 39: 316–322.

13.

Swevers

Al-Bender

Ganseman

et al.

An integrated friction model structure with improved presliding behavior for accurate friction compensation. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2000; 45: 675–686.

14.

Piatkowski

. Dahl and LuGre dynamic friction models — The analysis of selected properties. Mech Mach Theory 2014; 73: 91–100.

15.

Ismail

Ikhouane

Rodellar

. The hysteresis Bouc-Wen model: A survey. Arch Comput Meth Eng 2009; 16: 161–188.

16.

Dahl PR. A solid friction model. Technical report contract no. AF04695-67-C-0158. Los Angeles, CA: Aerospace Corp., 1968.

17.

Canudas de Wit

Olsson

Astrom

et al.

A new model for control of systems with friction. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1995; 40: 419–425.

18.

Canudas de Wit

. Comments on “A new model for control of systems with friction”. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1998; 43: 1189–1190.

19.

Dupont

Hayward

Armstrong

et al.

Single state elasto-plastic friction models. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2002; 47: 787–792.

20.

Hsieh

Pan

. Dynamic behavior and modelling of the pre-sliding static friction. Wear 2000; 242: 1–17.

21.

Tjahjowidodo

Lau

MWS

et al.

An investigation of friction-based tendon sheath model appropriate for control purposes. Mech Syst Signal Process 2014; 42: 97–114.

22.

Liu

Zhang

et al.

Experimental comparison of ﬁve friction models on the same test-bed of the micro stick-slip motion system. Mech Sci 2015; 6: 15–28.

23.

Lampaert V, Al-Bender F and Swevers J. A generalized Maxwell-slip friction model appropriate for control purposes. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference physics and control (PhyCon), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2003, pp.1170–1177.

24.

Tjahjowidodo T, Al-Bender F and Van Brussel H. Friction identification and compensation in a DC motor. In: Proceedings of 16th IFAC world congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 2005.

25.

Lin

C-J

Yau

H-T

Tian

Y-C

. Identification and compensation of nonlinear friction characteristics and precision control for a linear motor stage. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2013; 18: 1385–1396.

26.

Korda M and Mezic I. Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive control. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.03537 2016/2017.