Robot-assisted therapy has gained wide attention in rehabilitation engineering, allowing patients with lower limb motor disorders to perform repeatable and consistent upright bipedal walking. The goal of this paper is to develop a novel wearable powered exoskeleton that enables the paraplegic to perform basic daily movements for active rehabilitation training of lower limbs. Mechanical structure and driving devices of the exoskeleton are reasonably designed and selected to ensure natural interaction with the user and provide sufficient driving torques in the course of walking. In order to avoid unwanted interaction forces between the exoskeleton and the patient, the passive exoskeleton testing system is proposed to measure and record various postures as the reference trajectories. In addition, a cascaded proportional–integral–derivative controller is designed to complete walking assistance tasks in passive control modes. Four typical trajectory tracking tasks are carried out for the sake of evaluating the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed control strategy. Further experiments were conducted by a healthy subject wearing the rehabilitation exoskeleton to perform sit-to-stand and level walking, and the results demonstrated that the developed robot-assisted system had the natural period and favorable response patterns.
Brown-TrioloDLRoachMJNelsonKet al.Consumer perspectives on mobility: Implications for neuroprosthesis design. J Rehabil Res Develop2002; 39: 659–669.
2.
YuSNJangJHKimDHet al.A gait-assistive mobile robot based on a body weight support and autonomous path tracking system. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2012; 226: 828–841.
3.
HannoldEMYoungMERittmanMRet al.Locomotor training: Experiencing the changing body. J Rehab Res Develop2006; 43: 905–916.
4.
JordanMMBerkowitzDHannoldEet al.Thinking through every step: How people with spinal cord injuries relearn to walk. Qual Health Res2013; 23: 1027–1041.
5.
IshikawaSStevensSLKangMet al.Reliability of daily step activity monitoring in adults with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Rehab Res Develop2011; 48: 1187–1194.
6.
PompaAMoroneGIosaMet al.Does robot-assisted gait training improve ambulation in highly disabled multiple sclerosis people? A pilot randomized control trial. Multiple Scler J2016; 23: 696–703.
7.
WuQCWangXSDuFPet al.Development and analysis of a gravity-balanced exoskeleton for active rehabilitation training of upper limb. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2015; 230: 3777–3790.
8.
RienerRLünenburgerLJezernikSet al.Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: First experimental results. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng2005; 13: 380–394.
9.
YanHYangCJ. Design and validation of a lower limb exoskeleton employing the recumbent cycling modality for post-stroke rehabilitation. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2014; 228: 3517–3525.
10.
MengWLiuQZhouZet al.Recent development of mechanisms and control strategies for robot-assisted lower limb rehabilitation. Mechatronics2015; 31: 132–145.
11.
ArunJBurtSRymerWZ. Use of lower-limb robotics to enhance practice and participation in individuals with neurological conditions. Pediatric Phys Ther2017; 29: 48–56.
12.
AnamKAl-JumailyAA. Active exoskeleton control systems: State of the art. Procedia Eng2012; 41: 988–994.
13.
JezernikSColomboGKellerTet al.Robotic orthosis lokomat: A rehabilitation and research tool. Neuro Modul2003; 6: 108–115.
14.
Banala SK, Agrawal SK and Scholz JP. Active leg exoskeleton (ALEX) for gait rehabilitation of motor-impaired patients. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2007, pp.401–407. Netherlands: IEEE.
15.
Tufekciler N, Asseldonk EHF, Kooij H, et al. Velocity-dependent reference trajectory generation for the LOPES gait training robot. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2011: 5975414. Switzerland: IEEE.
16.
KoopmanBAsseldonkEHFKooijH. Estimation of human hip and knee multi-Joint dynamics using the LOPES gait trainer. IEEE Trans Robot2016; 32: 920–932.
17.
AoyagiDIchinoseWEHarkemaSJet al.A robot and control algorithm that can synchronously assist in naturalistic motion during body-weight-supported gait training following neurologic injury. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2007; 15: 387–400.
18.
Unluhisarcikli O, Pietrusinski M, Weinberg B, et al. Design and control of a robotic lower extremity exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on intelligent robotics, 2011, pp.4893–4898. New York: IEEE.
19.
FarrisRJQuinteroHAMurraySAet al.A preliminary assessment of legged mobility provided by a lower limb exoskeleton for persons with paraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2014; 22: 482–490.
20.
PranskyJ. The Pransky interview: Russ Angold, co-founder and president of Ekso™ Labs. Ind Robot2014; 41: 329–334.
21.
KozlowskiAJBryceTNDijkersMet al.Time and effort required by persons with spinal cord injury to learn to use a powered exoskeleton for assisted walking. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil2015; 21: 110–121.
22.
SalePRussoEFRussoMet al.Effects on mobility training and de-adaptations in subjects with spinal cord injury due to a wearable robot: a preliminary report. BMC Neurol2016; 16: 12–12.
23.
QuinteroHAFarrisRJGoldfarbM. A method for the autonomous control of lower limb exoskeletons for persons with paraplegia. ASME J Med Devices2012; 6: 1003 1–6.
24.
Kwak NS, Muller KR and Lee SW. Toward exoskeleton control based on steady state visual evoked potentials. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE international winter workshop on brain-computer interface, 2014, 14211292: pp.1–2. South Korea: IEEE.
25.
YoungAJFerrisDP. State-of-the-art and future directions for robotic lower limb exoskeletons. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2017; 25: 171–182.
26.
YangCZhangJChenYet al.A review of exoskeleton-type systems and their key technologies. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2008; 222: 1599–1612.
27.
Neuhaus PD, Noorden JH, Craig TJ, et al. Design and evaluation of Mina: A robotic orthosis for paraplegics. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2011, pp.1–8. Switzerland: IEEE.
28.
EsquenaziATalatyMPackelAet al.The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2012; 91: 911–921.
29.
YuSHanCChoIet al.Design considerations of a lower limb exoskeleton system to assist walking and load-carrying of infantry soldiers. Appl Bionics Biomech2014; 11: 119–134.
30.
ChenBMaHQinLYet al.Recent developments and challenges of lower extremity exoskeletons. J Orthop Transl2016; 5: 26–37.
31.
YuHYHuangSNChenGet al.Human–robot interaction control of rehabilitation robots with series elastic actuators. IEEE Trans Robot2015; 31: 1089–1100.
32.
Han YL and Wang XS. Biomechanics study of human lower limb walking: Implication for design of power-assisted robot. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2010, pp.3398–3403. Taiwan: IEEE.
