This work deals with the estimation and the sensitivity analysis of the 3-UPU parallel robot error. Based on the Newton–Euler formalism, the robot dynamic model is given in a closed form. This model is validated by the software ADAMS. Using the interval analysis method, a new algorithm is proposed, which estimates the errors in the motion of the end-effector and the errors in the actuator forces as a function of the design parameters uncertainties. The obtained results show that the kinematic errors are minimal at the workspace center. Moreover, these errors increase as the platform moves along the vertical axis. It is also shown that kinematic errors in the actuator joints are the most influential parameters on the manipulator accuracy. Therefore, using actuators with a higher accuracy can highly reduce the errors in motion of the platform.
ChouaibiYChebbiAHAffiZet al.Analytical modeling and analysis of the clearance induced orientation error of the RAF translational parallel manipulator. Robotica2014; 34: 1898–1921.
8.
Al-WidyanKMaXQAngelesJ. The robust design of parallel spherical robots. Mech Mach Theory2001; 46: 335–343.
9.
BinaudNCaroSWengerP. Comparison of 3-RPR planar parallel manipulators with regard to their kinetostatic performance and sensitivity to geometric uncertainties. Meccanica2001; 46: 75–88.
10.
ChakerAMlikaALaribiMAet al.Clearance and manufacturing errors’ effects on the accuracy of the 3-RCC Spherical Parallel Manipulator. Eur J Mech A/Solids2013; 37: 86–95.
11.
AffiZRomdhaneL. Analysis and mapping of the orientation error of a 3-DOF translational parallel manipulator. Robotica2009; 27: 367–377.
12.
Wang N, Guo S, Fang Y, et al. Error sensibility analysis of 3-UPU parallel manipulator based on probability distribution. In: Second international conference on mechanic automation and control engineering, 2011, pp.1296–1301. New York: IEEE.
13.
FrisoliASolazziMPellegrinettiDet al.A new screw theory method for the estimation of position accuracy in spatial parallel manipulators with revolute joint clearances. Mech Mach Theory2011; 46: 1929–1949.
CaroSBennisFWengerP. Tolerance synthesis of mechanisms: a robust design approach. J Mech Des2005; 127: 86–94.
16.
FontesJVDa SilvaMM. On the dynamic performance of parallel kinematic manipulators with actuation and kinematic redundancies. Mech Mach Theory2016; 103: 148–166.
17.
WuGStéphaneCBaiSet al.Dynamic modeling and design optimization of a 3-DOF spherical parallel manipulator. Robot Auton Syst2014; 62: 1377–1386.
18.
PacMRPopaDO. Interval analysis of kinematic errors in serial manipulators using product of exponentials formula. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng2013; 10: 525–535.
19.
NeumaierA. Interval methods for systems of equations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
20.
MerletJP. Solving the forward kinematics of a gough-type parallel. Int J Robot Res2004; 23: 221–235.
21.
Shan G, Baoming Y and Qiang Y. Interval analysis and its applications to control problems. In: International conference on educational and information technology (ICEIT 2010), Chongqing, China, 2010, pp.213–218.
22.
Wang K, Léonard F and Abba G. A novel approach for simplification of industrial robot dynamic model using interval method. In: IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, Besançon, France, 2014, pp.1697–1703.
23.
AlefeldGMayerG. Interval analysis: Theory and applications. J Comput Appl Math2000; 121: 421–464.
24.
Jaulin L, Kieffer M, Didrit O, et al. Applied interval analysis with examples in parameter and state estimation. In: Robust control and robotics. New York: Springer, 2001.
25.
MerletJP. Interval analysis for certified numerical solution of problems in robotics. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci2009; 19: 399–412.
26.
TannousMCaroSGoldsztejnA. Sensitivity analysis of parallel manipulators using an interval linearization method. Mech Mach Theory2014; 71: 93–114.
27.
TsaiLJoshiS. Kinematics and optimization of a spatial 3-UPU parallel manipulator. ASME J Mech Des2000; 122: 439–446.
28.
Rump S. INTLAB – INTerval LABoratory. In: Cendes T (ed.) Developments in reliable computing. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, pp.77–104.
29.
Goldzstejn A. Sensitivity analysis using a fixed point interval iteration. HAL report number: hal-00339377, 2008.
30.
ChenGWangHLinZ. A unified approach to the accuracy analysis of planar parallel manipulators both with input uncertainties and joint clearance. Mech Mach Theory2013; 64: 1–17.
31.
Di GregorioR. Kinematics of the 3-UPU wrist. Mech Mach Theory2003; 38: 253–263.
32.
TsaiLWJoshiS. Kinematic and optimization of a spatial 3-UPU parallel manipulator. ASME J Mech Des1999; 122: 439–446.
33.
JiPWuH. Kinematics analysis of an offset 3-UPU translational parallel robotic manipulator. Robot Auton Syst2003; 42: 117–123.
34.
Zheng XZ, Luo YG and Bin HZ. Inverse dynamics of 3-UPU parallel mechanism with pure rotation based on D’Alembert principle. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation, Harbin, China, 5–8 August 2007, pp.2842–2847.
35.
Goldzstejn A. Sensitivity analysis using a fixed point interval iteration. HAL Report Number: hal-00339377, 2008.
36.
KearfottRBNakaoMTNeumaierAet al.Standardized notation in interval analysis. Comput Technol2010; 15: 7–13.
37.
Shary SP. Krawczyk operator revised. In: Interval mathematics and interval constraint programming (ICCM) workshops, Novosibirsk, Russia, June 2004, pp.307–313.
38.
Tannous M, Caro S and Goldsztejn A. Sensitivity analysis of parallel manipulators using a fixed point interval iteration method. In: 13th world congress in mechanism and machine science, Guanajuato, México, 2011.
39.
Hu B, Lu Y and Mao H. Inverse dynamic modeling of two unsymmetrical 3UPU parallel manipulators. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on intelligent robotics and applications, Singapore, 16–18 December 2009, pp.580–591.
