A homogenization-based Chebyshev interval finite element method for periodical composite structural-acoustic systems with multi-scale interval parameters
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2019
A homogenization-based Chebyshev interval finite element method for periodical composite structural-acoustic systems with multi-scale interval parameters
For the periodical composite structural-acoustic system with multi-scale interval uncertainties, a new interval analysis approach is presented in this study. In periodical composites structural-acoustic systems with multi-scale interval parameters, the variation ranges of the sound pressure response can be calculated using the homogenization-based interval finite element method. However, the homogenization-based interval finite element method that is based on Taylor series can only suit periodical composites structural-acoustic problems with small uncertainty degree. To consider larger uncertainty degree, by combining the Chebyshev polynomial series and the homogenization-based finite element, a homogenization-based Chebyshev interval finite element method is presented to predict the sound pressure responses of the structural-acoustic system involving periodical composite and multi-scale interval parameters. Compared with homogenization-based interval finite element method, homogenization-based Chebyshev interval finite element method can obtain higher accurate numerical solutions in the approximate process. Besides, homogenization-based Chebyshev interval finite element method can be implemented without conducting the complex derivation process. Numerical results verify the validity and practicability of the presented homogenization-based Chebyshev interval finite element method for the periodical composite structural-acoustic problem.
HashinZRosenBW. The elastic moduli of fiber-reinforced materials. J Appl Mech1964; 31(2): 223–232.
2.
TanakaSet al.A probabilistic investigation of fatigue life and cumulative cycle ratio. Eng Fract Mech1984; 20: 501–513.
3.
HollisterSJKikuchiN. A comparison of homogenization and standard mechanics analyses for periodic porous composites. Comput Mech1992; 10: 73–95.
4.
HassaniBHintonE. A review of homogenization and topology optimization I – homogenization theory for media with periodic structure. Comput Struct1998; 69: 707–717.
5.
HassaniBHintonE. A review of homogenization and topology opimization II – analytical and numerical solution of homogenization equations. Comput Struct1998; 69: 719–738.
6.
MichelJCMoulinecHSuquetP. Effective properties of composite materials with periodic microstructure: a computational approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng1999; 172: 109–143.
7.
LiEet al.A new homogenization formulation for multifunctional composites. Int J Comput Methods2016; 13: 1640002.
8.
LiEet al.Numerical homogenization for incompressible materials using selective smoothed finite element method. Compos Struct2015; 123: 216–232.
9.
ChenNet al.Hybrid interval and random analysis for structural-acoustic systems including periodical composites and multi-scale bounded hybrid uncertain parameters. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 115: 524–544.
10.
WangLet al.Structural time-dependent reliability assessment of the vibration active control system with unknown-but-bounded uncertainties. Struct Control Health Monitor2017; 24(10): e1965.
11.
WangLet al.Hybrid time-variant reliability estimation for active control structures under aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. J Sound Vib2018; 419: 469–492.
12.
WangLet al.Active force control of structure-borne sound based on robust optimization subjected to an irregular cavity with uncertainties. Aerosp Sci Technol2018; 73: 318–331.
13.
XiaBYuDLiuJ. Interval and subinterval perturbation methods for a structural-acoustic system with interval parameters. J Fluid Struct2013; 38: 146–163.
14.
XiaBYuD. Modified interval perturbation finite element method for a structural-acoustic system with interval parameters. J Appl Mech2013; 80: 041027.
15.
WangCet al.Interval finite element analysis and reliability-based optimization of coupled structural-acoustic system with uncertain parameters. Finite Elem Anal Des2014; 91: 108–114.
16.
XuMQiuZWangX. Uncertainty propagation in SEA for structural–acoustic coupled systems with non-deterministic parameters. J Sound Vib2014; 333: 3949–3965.
17.
XiaBYinSYuD. A new random interval method for response analysis of structural–acoustic system with interval random variables. Appl Acoust2015; 99: 31–42.
18.
XiaBYuDLiuJ. Hybrid uncertain analysis for structural–acoustic problem with random and interval parameters. J Sound Vib2013; 332: 2701–2720.
19.
WangMHuangQ. A new hybrid uncertain analysis method for structural-acoustic systems with random and interval parameters. Comput Struct2016; 175: 15–28.
20.
WangMHuangQLiS. A subinterval response surface method for frequency response analysis of structural-acoustic system with uncertain-but-bounded parameters. Int Conf Indus Eng Appl IEEE2017, pp. 327–330.
21.
ChenNet al.Uncertainty analysis of a structural–acoustic problem using imprecise probabilities based on p-box representations. Mech Syst Signal Process2016; 80: 45–57.
22.
XuMet al.Hybrid uncertainty propagation in structural-acoustic systems based on the polynomial chaos expansion and dimension-wise analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2017; 320: 198–217.
23.
StefanouG. The stochastic finite element method: past, present and future. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2009; 198: 1031–1051.
24.
GaoW. Stochastically optimal active control of a smart truss structure under stationary random excitation. J Sound Vib2006; 290: 1256–1268.
25.
SpanosPDKontsosA. A multiscale Monte Carlo finite element method for determining mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites. Probabil Eng Mech2008; 23: 456–470.
26.
FengYTLiCFOwenDRJ. A directed Monte Carlo solution of linear stochastic algebraic system of equations. Finite Elem Anal Des2010; 46: 462–473.
27.
SeçginAJDunneJFZoghaibL. Extreme-value-based statistical bounding of low, mid, and high frequency responses of a forced plate with random boundary conditions. J Vib Acoust2012; 134: 021003.
28.
DunneLWDunneJF. An FRF bounding method for randomly uncertain structures with or without coupling to an acoustic cavity. J Sound Vib2009; 322: 98–134.
29.
KaminskiM. Stochastic second-order perturbation approach to the stress-based finite element method. Int J Solids Struct2001; 38: 3831–3852.
30.
CavdarOet al.Perturbation based stochastic finite element analysis of the structural systems with composite sections under earthquake forces. Steel Compos Struct2008; 8: 129–144.
31.
KamińskiMM. A generalized stochastic perturbation technique for plasticity problems. Comput Mech2010; 45: 349.
32.
AdhikariS. Doubly spectral stochastic finite-element method for linear structural dynamics. ASCE J Aerosp Eng2011; 24: 264–276.
33.
DossoSEWilmutMJ. Bayesian multiple-source localization in an uncertain ocean environment. J Acoust Soc Am2011; 129: 3577–3589.
34.
HaukaasTGardoniP. Model uncertainty in finite-element analysis: Bayesian finite elements. J Eng Mech2011; 137: 519–526.
35.
ZhanZet al.An enhanced Bayesian based model validation method for dynamic systems. J Mech Des2011; 133: 041005.
36.
AntoniJ. A Bayesian approach to sound source reconstruction: optimal basis, regularization, and focusing. J Acoust Soc Am2012; 131: 2873.
37.
LeeDParkSShinS. Non-stochastic interval arithmetic-based finite element analysis for structural uncertainty response estimate. Struct Eng Mech2008; 29: 469–488.
38.
YinHet al.Hybrid finite element/statistical energy method for mid-frequency analysis of structure − acoustic systems with interval parameters. J Sound Vib2015; 353: 181–204.
39.
XiaBet al.Dynamic response analysis of structure under time-variant interval process model. J Sound Vib2016; 381: 121–138.
40.
XiaBet al.Optimization of uncertain acoustic metamaterial with Helmholtz resonators based on interval model. Sci China Technol Sci2017; 60: 385–398.
41.
ChenNet al.Homogenization-based interval analysis for structural-acoustic problem involving periodical composites and multi-scale uncertain-but-bounded parameters. J Acoust Soc Am2017; 141: 2768.
42.
WuJet al.Interval uncertain method for multibody mechanical systems using Chebyshev inclusion functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng2013; 95: 608–630.
43.
WuJet al.A Chebyshev interval method for nonlinear dynamic systems under uncertainty. Appl Math Model2013; 37: 4578–4591.
44.
YinHet al.Response analysis of uncertain structural-acoustic system based on multi-convex set model. J Fluid Struct2016; 67: 173–189.
45.
YinSet al.Hybrid Chebyshev interval finite-element and statistical energy analysis method for midfrequency analysis of built-up systems with interval uncertainties. J Eng Mech2016; 142: 04016071.
46.
BendsøeMPSigmundO. Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications, New York: Springer, 2003.
47.
JiangEZhaoFShuY. Numerical approximation, Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2008.
