Study of plastically deformed region underneath the ball in indentation tests and evaluation of mechanical properties of materials through finite element simulation and a hybrid algorithm
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2021
Study of plastically deformed region underneath the ball in indentation tests and evaluation of mechanical properties of materials through finite element simulation and a hybrid algorithm
Ball indentation technique has been studied extensively in literature and it has been widely applied to determine mechanical properties of different materials because of simplicity and minimal requirement of material for the tests. Originally, the material deformation was represented in terms of a representative strain, which is a non-dimensional form of indentation diameter and a representative stress, which again is the instantaneous mean pressure multiplied by some empirical factors. It is known that the state of deformation as well as stress beneath the ball is multiaxial in nature in a ball indentation test. In this work, a new hybrid algorithm for estimation of equivalent stress and equivalent plastic strain during the process of indentation in the most stressed location beneath the ball has been developed. The algorithms uses experimental load–indentation data as well as the multiaxial stress and strain parameters obtained from 2D axisymmetric elastic-plastic finite element simulations. The stress and strain multiaxial parameters are functions of applied load, material yield stress and strain hardening exponents. The algorithm is iterative in nature and uses suitable initial guess values for material yield stress and strain hardening exponents and it converges very quickly. This method can be applied to determine the material stress–strain curve for a wide range of equivalent plastic strain, yield stress as well as plastic strain hardening exponent of the engineering materials. The data points of load vs. indentation depth as obtained directly from the ball indentation tests can be used in the new algorithm without the need for conducting unloading during the test. To illustrate the new scheme, two case studies have been presented where the results from the proposed new method have been compared with those of the existing method in literature and tensile test data to check the accuracy.
YangYWangWQSongMD. The measurement of mechanical properties of pipe steels in service through continuous ball indentation test. Proc Eng2015; 130: 1742–1754.
2.
DasGDasMGhoshS, et al.Effect of aging on mechanical properties of 6063 Al-alloy using instrumented ball indentation technique. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527: 1590–1594.
3.
MathewMDMurtyKLRaoKBS, et al.Ball indentation studies on the effect of aging on mechanical behavior of alloy 625. Mater Sci Eng A1999; 264: 159–166.
4.
GhoshSYadavSDasG. Ball indentation technique: a currently developed tool to study the effect of various heat treatments on the mechanical properties of En24 steel. Mater Lett2008; 62: 3966–3968.
5.
NagarajuSGanesh KumarJVasantharajaP, et al.Evaluation of strength property variations across 9Cr-1Mo steel weld joints using automated ball indentation (ABI) technique. Mater Sci Eng A2017; 695: 199–210.
6.
MurtyKLMiragliaPQMathewMD, et al.Characterization of gradients in mechanical properties of SA-533B steel welds using ball indentation. Int J Pres Ves Pip1999; 76: 361–369.
7.
PamnaniRKarthikVJayakumarT, et al.Evaluation of mechanical properties across micro alloyed HSLA steel weld joints using automated ball indentation. Mater Sci Eng A2016; 651: 214–223.
8.
Haggag FM, Nanstad RK and Braski DN. Structural integrity evaluation based on an innovative field indentation microprobe. In: Marriott DL, Mager TR, and Bamford WH (eds) Innovative approaches to irradiation damage and failure analysis, PVP Vol. 170. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1989, pp.101–107.
9.
HaggagFM. In-situ measurements of mechanical properties using novel automated ball indentation system. ASTM STP1993; 1204: 27–44.
10.
MurtyKLMathewMD. Nondestructive monitoring of structural materials using automated ball indentation (ABI) technique. Nucl Eng Des2004; 228: 81–96.
11.
HaggagFMNanstadRKHuttonJT, et al.Use of automated ball indentation testing to measure flow properties and estimate fracture toughness in metallic materials. ASTM STP1990; 1092: 188–208.
12.
YamamotoTKurishitaHMatsushimaT, et al.Development of innovative indentation system and its application to cyclic ball indentation test for small-sized specimens. J Nucl Mater1996; 239: 219–227.
13.
Haggag FM, Nanstad RK, Hutton JT, et al. Applications of automation technology to fatigue and fracture testing. In: Braun AA, Ashbaugh NE and Smith FM (eds) ASTM STP 1092. Philadelphia: American Society of Testing and Materials, 1990, pp.188–208.
14.
SakaneMHiranoAHamadaN, et al.A new extraction method of creep exponents and coefficients from an indentation creep test by multiaxial stress analysis. Theor Appl Fract Mech2020; 107: 102522–102522.
15.
TaborD. A Simple theory of static and dynamic hardness. Proc Roy Soc London1948; 192: 247–274.
16.
FrancisHA. Phenomenological analysis of plastic spherical indentation. ASME J Eng Mater Technol1976; 98: 272–281.
17.
HaggagFMByunTSHongJH, et al.Indentation-energy-to-fracture (IEF) parameter for characterization of DBTT in carbon steels using nondestructive automated ball indentation (ABI) technique. Scr Mater1998; 38: 645–650.
18.
ByunTSKimJWHongJH. A theoretical model for determination of fracture toughness of reactor pressure vessel steels in the transition region from automated ball indentation test. J Nucl Mater1998; 252: 187–194.
19.
ByunTSKimSHLeeBS, et al.Estimation of fracture toughness transition curves of RPV steels from ball indentation and tensile test data. J Nucl Mater2000; 277: 263–273.
20.
MalowTRKochCCMiragliaPQ, et al.Compressive mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline Fe investigated with an automated ball indentation technique. Mater Sci Eng A1998; 252: 36–43.
21.
YanSLLiLY. Finite element analysis of cyclic indentation of an elastic-perfectly plastic half-space by a rigid sphere. J Mech Eng Sci2003; 217: 505–514.
22.
YamamotoTKurishitaHMatsuiH. Modelling of the cyclic ball indentation test for small specimens using the finite element method. J Nucl Mater1999; 271–272: 440–444.
23.
HernotXBartierOBekoucheY, et al.Influence of penetration depth and mechanical properties on contact radius determination for spherical indentation. Int J Solids Struct2006; 43: 4136–4153.
24.
TaljatBPharrGM. Development of pile-up during spherical indentation of elastic-plastic solids. Int J Solids Struct2004; 41: 3891–3904.
25.
KarthikVVisweswaranPBhushanA, et al.Finite element analysis of spherical indentation to study pile-up/sink-in phenomena in steels and experimental validation. Int J Mech Sci2012; 54: 74–83.
26.
KralERKomvopoulosKBogyDB. Elastic-plastic finite element analysis of repeated indentation of a half-space by a rigid sphere. ASME J Appl Mech1993; 60: 829–841.
27.
ArunkumarS. A review of indentation theory. Mater Today Proc2018; 5: 23664–23673.
28.
TrichyGRScattergoodROKochCC, et al.Ball indentation tests for a Zr-based bulk metallic glass. Scr Mater2005; 53: 1461–1465.
29.
WangFZhaoJZhuN, et al.A comparative study on Johnson-Cook constitutive modeling for Ti-6Al-4 V alloy using automated ball indentation (ABI) technique. J Alloys Compd2015; 633: 220–228.
30.
ChenHCaiL-XBaoC. Equivalent-energy indentation method to predict the tensile properties of light alloys. Mater Des2019; 162: 322–330.
31.
FerrantiLArmstrongRWThadhaniNN. Elastic/plastic deformation behaviour in a continuous ball indentation test. Mater Sci Eng A2004; 371: 251–255.
32.
CabibboMPaolettiCLasioB, et al.Indentation strain rate sensitivity of ball-milled spark-plasma sintered Cu-C metal matrix composite. J Alloys Compd2018; 767: 838–847.
33.
AmmarHRHaggagFMAlaboodiAS, et al.Nondestructive measurements of flow properties of nanocrystalline Al-Cu-Ti alloy using automated ball indentation (ABI) technique. Mater Sci Eng A2018; 729: 477–486.
34.
LiBZhangSLiJ, et al.Quantitative evaluation of mechanical properties of machined surface layer using automated ball indentation technique. Mater Sci Eng A2020; 773: 138717–138717.
35.
ZhangAZhangSBianC. Mechanical properties of bovine cortical bone based on the automated ball indentation technique and graphics processing method. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2018; 78: 321–328.
36.
ZhangBZhangXWuS, et al.Indentation of expanded polystyrene foams with a ball. Int J Mech Sci2019; 161–162: 105030–105030.
37.
XuYMellorBG. Comparative study of impact and static indentation tests on particulate-filled thermoplastic fluoropolymer coatings. J Mech Eng Sci2014; 228: 22–30.
38.
MurtyKLMathewMDWangY, et al.Nondestructive determination of tensile properties and fracture toughness of cold worked A36 steel. Int J Pres Ves Pip1998; 75: 831–840.
39.
MathewMDMurtyKL. Non-destructive studies on tensile and fracture properties of molybdenum at low temperatures (148 to 423 K). J Mater Sci1999; 34: 1497–1503.
40.
ZafarUHareCHassanpourA, et al.Ball indentation on powder beds for assessing powder flowability: analysis of operation window. Powder Technol2017; 31: 300–306.
41.
ChenQZafarUGhadiriM, et al.Assessment of surface caking of powders using the ball indentation method. Int J Pharm2017; 521: 61–68.
42.
PashaMHareCHassanpourA, et al.Numerical analysis of strain rate sensitivity in ball indentation on cohesive powder beds. Chem Eng Sci2015; 123: 92–98.
43.
HillsDALiY. The use of indentation tests to determine the fracture toughness of brittle materials. J Mech Eng Sci1989; 203: 333–341.
44.
PashaMHareCHassanpourA, et al.Analysis of ball indentation on cohesive powder beds using distinct element modelling. Powder Technol2013; 23: 80–90.
45.
LiLYWuCYThorntonC. A theoretical model for the contact of elastoplastic bodies. J Mech Eng Sci2001; 216: 421–431.
46.
BouzakisK-DVidakisN. Superficial plastic response determination of hard isotropic materials using ball indentations and a FEM optimization technique. Mater Character1999; 42: 1–12.
47.
LiLYThorntonCWuCY. Impact behaviour of the elastoplastic sphere with a rigid wall. J Mech Eng Sci2000; 214: 1107–1114.
48.
TiroshJTylisADavidiG. Upper and lower bounds to indentation of rigid ball into semi-infinite solid. Int J Mech Sci2008; 50: 328–341.
49.
ZouBGuanKSWuSB. Determination of area reduction rate by continuous ball indentation test. Int J Pres Ves Pip2016; 139–140: 220–227.
50.
TorskayaE. Study of roughness effect on elastic indentation of coated bodies. J Mech Eng Sci2016; 230: 1392–1397.
51.
Ramberg W and Osgood WR. Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters. Technical Note No. 902, National advisory committee for aeronautics, Washington DC, 1943.
52.
KamayaM. Ramberg-Osgood type stress-strain curve estimation using yield and ultimate strengths for failure assessments. Int J Pres Ves Pip2016; 137: 1–12.
53.
N'sougloKERodríguez-MartínezJACazacuO. The effect of tension-compression asymmetry on the formation of dynamic necking instabilities under plane strain stretching. Int J Plast2020; 128: 102656–102656.
54.
ChiYQZhouXHQiaoXG, et al.Tension-compression asymmetry of extruded Mg-Gd-Y-Zr alloy with a bimodal microstructure studied by in-situ synchrotron diffraction. Mater Des2019; 170: 107705–107705.
