Adhesives play an important role in many key industrial sectors, such as the automotive industry, enabling the construction of lightweight, multi-material structures, combining polymers, composites and metals. However, adhesives are usually polymeric materials, which can be affected by environmental and working conditions, such as moisture and contamination. Although moisture and contamination degrade the adhesive, the failure of a bonded joint is often ultimately interfacial. Therefore, a literature review on the influence of those factors on the interfacial properties of adhesive joints is performed to understand the phenomena that take part in the degradation on adhesive joints when subjected to humid and contaminated environments, which can oftentimes be the case in factory conditions, especially for parts from third-party suppliers. The mechanisms and effects of moisture aging and contamination are presented, as well as experimental testing methods and practical case studies. It is concluded that both moisture and other contaminants may lead to a reduction in joint strength and catastrophic adhesive failure. Moisture absorption can occur through the adhesive, but in an adhesive joint, it can additionally occur through the substrate, the interface between the adhesive and the substrate or in the cracks and pores of the adhesive. After water ingresses into the adhesive, it decreases its mechanical properties and plasticizes it. However, in an adhesive joint, the water diffusion occurs much faster than in bulk adhesive due to the complementary diffusion paths, which typically leads to adhesive failure at the adhesive/substrate interface. Additionally, in an adhesive joint, water may induce the hydrolysis of the substrates or have other chemical interactions with them. Contaminants can diffuse through the joint or remain at the adhesive/ substrate interface. When they diffuse through the joint, they have consequences similar to those of water sorption. However, when they remain at the interface, they can produce locally debonded areas, which may lead to joint failure.
da SilvaLÖchsnerAAdamsR. Handbook of adhesion technology, New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media, 2018.
2.
AdamsR, et al.Structural adhesive joints in engineering, New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media, 1997.
3.
da SilvaLPirondiAÖchsnerA. Hybrid adhesive joints2011; vol 6New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
4.
GreiveldingerM, et al.Oil-covered substrates: a model study of the evaluation in the interphase during cure of an epoxy adhesive. J Adhes2000; 73: 179–195.
5.
Kinloch AJ. Interfacial Fracture Mechanical Aspects of Adhesive Bonded Joints – A Review, The Journal of Adhesion 10: 193–219.
6.
Deryagin BV and Krotova NA. Electrical theory of adhesion of films to solid surfaces. In: Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR. Vol. 61, 1948, pp.849–852.
7.
Kinloch A. Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
8.
Voiutskii S. Autohesion and adhesion of high polymers. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963.
9.
Wake W. Adhesion and the formulation of adhesives. Barking: Applied Science Publishers, 1982.
10.
Adams R. Adhesive bonding: science, technology and applications. 2005: Elsevier.
11.
Wilken R, Markus S, Amkreutz M, et al. Method and device for testing a surface quality. EP1893974 B1, 2008.
OwensDKWendtR. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci1969; 13: 1741–1747.
14.
LugscheiderEBobzinK. The influence on surface free energy of PVD-coatings. Surface Coat Technol2001; 142: 755–760.
15.
SharpeL. The interphase in adhesion. J Adhes1972; 4: 51–64.
16.
Jadhav P, Molligan D, Andersen S, et al. Effect of surface preparation on environmental durability of adhesive-bonded metallic surfaces. 2007.
17.
CromptonJ. Interfacial properties and stability in bonded aluminium. J Mater Sci1989; 24: 1575–1581.
18.
Barthés-LabrousseM-G. Mechanisms of formation of the interphase in epoxy-amine/aluminium joints. J Adhes2012; 88: 699–719.
19.
Coulaud M. Rôle des interfaces et interphases dans les assemblages collés. PhD Thesis, INSA, Lyon, 2007.
20.
MonternotHBénazetDAncenayH. Guide du collage, France: CETIM Senlis, 1978.
21.
HongSCaveNBoerioF. The modification of epoxy/metal interphases by adsorbed contaminants. J Adhes1992; 36: 265–279.
22.
ComynJ. Durability of structural adhesives, London: Applied Science, 1983.
23.
BrockmannW, et al.Adhesion in bonded aluminium joints for aircraft construction. Int J Adhes Adhes1986; 6: 115–IN1.
24.
BockenheimerCValeskeBPossartW. Network structure in epoxy aluminium bonds after mechanical treatment. Int J Adhes Adhes2002; 22: 349–356.
25.
PossartW, et al.Formation and structure of epoxy network interphases at the contact to native metal surfaces. Comptes Rendus Chimie2006; 9: 60–79.
26.
Grangeat R. Durabilité des assemblages collés en environnement humide-Instrumentation par capteurs à fibre optique. 2019.
27.
Baghdachi J, Martin G and Mahoney K. One-part, primerless windshield adhesive. SAE Technical Paper, 1990.
28.
Sun YK, Wan DT, Bao YW, et al. Study of tensile bond strength for structural silicone sealants after artificial accelerated aging. In: Key engineering materials. Vol. 768. Trans Tech Publ, 2018, pp.13–18.
29.
Vandereecken P and Maton I. Ways of improving the interfacial durability of silicone adhesives in building applications, in durability of building and construction sealants and adhesives. 4th Vol. Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2012.
30.
BarbosaAda SilvaLÖchsnerA. Hygrothermal aging of an adhesive reinforced with microparticles of cork. J Adhes Sci Technol2015; 29: 1714–1732.
31.
VianaG, et al.A review on the temperature and moisture degradation of adhesive joints. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2017; 231: 488–501.
32.
ZhouJLucasJ. Hygrothermal effects of epoxy resin. Part I: the nature of water in epoxy. Polymer1999; 40: 5505–5512.
33.
PethrickR. Design and ageing of adhesives for structural adhesive bonding–a review. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2015; 229: 349–379.
34.
CrankJ. The mathematics of diffusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.
35.
MalpotATouchardFBergamoS. Effect of relative humidity on mechanical properties of a woven thermoplastic composite for automotive application. Polymer Test2015; 48: 160–168.
36.
Mohd IshakZ, et al.Short glass fibre reinforcedpoly (butylene terephthalate) Part 1–Microstructural characterisation and kinetics of moisture absorption. Plastics, Rubber Compos2000; 29: 263–270.
37.
BoubakriA, et al.Impact of aging conditions on mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane. Mater Des2010; 31: 4194–4201.
38.
PopineauS, et al.Free/bound water absorption in an epoxy adhesive. Polymer2005; 46: 10733–10740.
39.
LiYMirandaJSueHJ. Hygrothermal diffusion behavior in bismaleimide resin. Polymer2001; 42: 7791–7799.
40.
Carter H, Kibler K and Reynolds J. Fundamental and operational glass transition temperatures of composite resins and adhesives. In: Advanced composite materials—environmental effects. Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 1978.
41.
CarterHKiblerK. Langmuir-type model for anomalous moisture diffusion in composite resins. J Compos Mater1978; 12: 118–131.
42.
GurtinMYatomiC. On a model for two phase diffusion in composite materials. J Compos Mater1979; 13: 126–130.
43.
MubasharA, et al.Moisture absorption–desorption effects in adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2009; 29: 751–760.
44.
LinYChenX. Moisture sorption–desorption–resorption characteristics and its effect on the mechanical behavior of the epoxy system. Polymer2005; 46: 11994–12003.
45.
LohW, et al.Modelling anomalous moisture uptake, swelling and thermal characteristics of a rubber toughened epoxy adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes2005; 25: 1–12.
46.
CognardJ. Blistering of glass-epoxy amine adhesive joints in water vapour at high pressure. An indication of interfacial crumpling. J Adhes1994; 47: 83–93.
47.
MoyPKaraszF. Epoxy-water interactions. Polym Eng Sci1980; 20: 315–319.
48.
DoyleGPethrickR. Environmental effects on the ageing of epoxy adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2009; 29: 77–90.
49.
Cognard P. Collage des Composites: Construction Aerospatiale, Automobile et Ferroviaire. Ed. Techniques Ingénieur, 2004.
50.
Cavodeau F, et al. Hygrothermal aging of an epoxy/ dicyandiamide structural adhesiveinfluence of water diffusion on the durability of the adhesive/galvanized steel interface. J Adhes. 2020; 96: 1027–1051.
51.
Zanni-DeffargesMShanahanM. Diffusion of water into an epoxy adhesive: comparison between bulk behaviour and adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes1995; 15: 137–142.
52.
De'NèveB, et al.Failure mode and ageing of steel/epoxy joints. Appl Surface Sci1998; 134: 202–212.
53.
BonniauPBunsellA. A comparative study of water absorption theories applied to glass epoxy composites. J Compos Mater1981; 15: 272–293.
54.
VianaG, et al.Behaviour of environmentally degraded epoxy adhesives as a function of temperature. J Adhes2017; 93: 95–112.
55.
SugimanSCrocombeAAschroftI. Experimental and numerical investigation of the static response of environmentally aged adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2013; 40: 224–237.
56.
HuaY, et al.Modelling environmental degradation in EA9321-bonded joints using a progressive damage failure model. J Adhes2006; 82: 135–160.
57.
CostaM, et al.Environmental effect on the fatigue degradation of adhesive joints: a review. J Adhes2017; 93: 127–146.
58.
CostaM, et al.Effect of humidity on the fatigue behaviour of adhesively bonded aluminium joints. Latin Am J Solids Struct2017; 14: 174–187.
59.
AshoftehRKhoramishadH. The influence of hygrothermal ageing on creep behavior of nanocomposite adhesive joints containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide nanoplatelets. Int J Adhes Adhes2019; 94: 1–12.
60.
De'NèveBShanahanM. Water absorption by an epoxy resin and its effect on the mechanical properties and infra-red spectra. Polymer1993; 34: 5099–5105.
61.
EllisTKaraszF. Interaction of epoxy resins with water: the depression of glass transition temperature. Polymer1984; 25: 664–669.
62.
ZhangYAdamsRda SilvaL. Absorption and glass transition temperature of adhesives exposed to water and toluene. Int J Adhes Adhes2014; 50: 85–92.
63.
ChatterjeeAGillespie JrJ. Moisture absorption behavior of epoxies and their S2 glass composites. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 108: 3942–3951.
64.
XiaoGShanahanM. Swelling of DGEBA/DDA epoxy resin during hygrothermal ageing. Polymer1998; 39: 3253–3260.
LegerRRoyAGrandidierJ. A study of the impact of humid aging on the strength of industrial adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2013; 44: 66–77.
67.
McKague EJrReynoldsJHalkiasJ. Swelling and glass transition relations for epoxy matrix material in humid environments. J Appl Polym Sci1978; 22: 1643–1654.
68.
WrightW. The effect of diffusion of water into epoxy resins and their carbon-fibre reinforced composites. Composites1981; 12: 201–205.
69.
SargentJ. Durability studies for aerospace applications using peel and wedge tests. Int J Adhes Adhes2005; 25: 247–256.
70.
OhSCookDTownsendH. Characterization of iron oxides commonly formed as corrosion products on steel. Hyperfine Interact1998; 112: 59–66.
71.
CambierSPosnerRFrankelG. Coating and interface degradation of coated steel, Part 1: Field exposure. Electrochim Acta2014; 133: 30–39.
72.
EftekhariMFatemiA. Tensile behavior of thermoplastic composites including temperature, moisture, and hygrothermal effects. Polym Test2016; 51: 151–164.
73.
KumarSSridharISivashankerS. Influence of humid environment on the performance of high strength structural carbon fiber composites. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 498: 174–178.
74.
VianaG, et al.Water diffusion in double cantilever beam adhesive joints. Latin Am J Solids Struct2017; 14: 188–201.
75.
Powers D. Interaction of water with epoxy. Sandia Report SAND2009-4405. New Mexico: Albuquerque, 2009.
76.
AntoonMKoenigJSerafiniT. Fourier-transform infrared study of the reversible interaction of water and a crosslinked epoxy matrix. J Polym Sci: Polymer Physics Edition1981; 19: 1567–1575.
77.
HoltmannspötterJCzarneckiJGudladtHJ. The use of power ultrasound energy to support interface formation for structural adhesive bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes2010; 30: 130–138.
78.
BrotherhoodCDrinkwaterBGuildF. The effect of compressive loading on the ultrasonic detectability of kissing bonds in adhesive joints. J Nondestruct Eval2002; 21: 95–104.
79.
JeenjitkaewCLuklinskaZGuildF. Morphology and surface chemistry of kissing bonds in adhesive joints produced by surface contamination. Int J Adhes Adhes2010; 30: 643–653.
Yan D, Drinkwater B and Neild S. Experimental and theoretical characterization of kissing bonds in adhesive joint using non-linear ultrasonic measurement. In: AIP conference proceedings, Kingston, Rhode Island, 26-31 July 2009. American Institute of Physics.
82.
Marty P, Desai N and Andersson J. NDT of kissing bond in aeronautical structures. In 16th world conference on NDT, Montreal, Canada, 30 August-3 September 2004.
83.
DebskiMShanahanMSchultzJ. Mechanisms of contaminant elimination by oil-accommodating adhesives Part 1: displacement and absorption. Int J Adhes Adhes1986; 6: 145–149.
84.
DebskiMShanahanMSchultzJ. Mechanisms of contaminant elimination by oil-accommodating adhesives Part 2: A model of the processes involved. Int J Adhesion Adhes1986; 6: 150–152.
85.
Akiyama H, et al. Influence of surface contaminants on the adhesion strength of structural adhesives with aluminium. J Adhes. 2020; 96: 1311–1325.
86.
Heide-JørgensenSBudzikM. Crack growth along heterogeneous interface during the DCB experiment. Int J Solids Struct2017; 120: 278–291.
87.
Heide-JørgensenSde FreitasSBudzikM. On the fracture behaviour of CFRP bonded joints under mode I loading: Effect of supporting carrier and interface contamination. Compos Sci Technol2018; 160: 97–110.
88.
HongS, et al.The effects of a slushing oil on the curing and degradation behavior of an oil-accommodating epoxy adhesive. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie: Appl Macromol Chem Phys1996; 238: 129–141.
89.
HeslehurstR. Observations in the structural response of adhesive bondline defects. Int J Adhes Adhes1999; 19: 133–154.
90.
GoglioLRezaeiMRossettoM. Moisture degradation of open-faced single lap joints. J Adhes Sci Technol2014; 28: 1382–1393.
91.
WyldeJSpeltJ. Measurement of adhesive joint fracture properties as a function of environmental degradation. Int J Adhes Adhes1998; 18: 237–246.
92.
LohW, et al.Environmental degradation of the interfacial fracture energy in an adhesively bonded joint. Eng Fract Mech2002; 69: 2113–2128.
93.
FernandesP, et al.The influence of water on the fracture envelope of an adhesive joint. Theoretical Appl Fract Mech2017; 89: 1–15.
94.
LiljedahlC, et al.Characterising moisture ingress in adhesively bonded joints using nuclear reaction analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes2009; 29: 356–360.
95.
HopkinsonI, et al.Fickian and Case II diffusion of water into amylose: a stray field NMR study. Carbohydrate Polym1997; 34: 39–47.
96.
MieloszykMOstachowiczW. Moisture contamination detection in adhesive bond using embedded FBG sensors. Mech Syst Signal Process2017; 84: 1–14.
97.
WeirMBastideCSungC. Characterization of interaction of water in epoxy by UV reflection spectroscopy. Macromolecules2001; 34: 4923–4926.
98.
Sung N, Prokopowicz G, Paik HJ, et al. UV reflection spectroscopy for in situ polymer characterization via bifurcated fiberoptic probe. In: Polymeric materials science and engineering fall meeting 1994, Washington, D.C., 1994.
99.
SatoT, et al.Detection of contaminants on pre-bond surface by LIBS. J Adhes2018; 94: 689–700.
100.
MeolaCCarlomagnoG. Recent advances in the use of infrared thermography. Measure Sci Technol2004; 15: R27.
101.
TigheRCDulieu-BartonJMQuinnS. Identification of kissing defects in adhesive bonds using infrared thermography. Int J Adhes Adhes2016; 64: 168–178.
102.
YanDDrinkwaterBNeildS. Measurement of the ultrasonic nonlinearity of kissing bonds in adhesive joints. Ndt & E Int2009; 42: 459–466.
103.
Cremers DA, Multari RA and Knight AK. Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy. In Meyers RA (ed) Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry 2016, pp.1–28.
104.
de FreitasSZarouchasDPoulisJ. The use of acoustic emission and composite peel tests to detect weak adhesion in composite structures. J Adhes2018; 94: 743–766.
105.
Bar-Cohen Y and Mal A. End product nondestructive evaluation of adhesive-bonded composite joints. In: ASM International, Engineered materials handbook, Ohio, United States: ASM International, Materials Park, 1990, pp.777–784.
106.
DillinghamROakleyB. Surface energy and adhesion in composite–composite adhesive bonds. J Adhes2006; 82: 407–426.
107.
RiderAOlsson-JacquesCArnottD. Influence of adherend surface preparation on bond durability. Surface Interface Analys: An International Journal devoted to the development and application of techniques for the analysis of surfaces, interfaces and thin films1999; 27: 1055–1063.
108.
BernsteinH. The average XH stretching frequency as a measure of XH bond properties. Spectrochim Acta1962; 18: 161–170.
109.
WapnerKGrundmeierG. Spatially resolved measurements of the diffusion of water in a model adhesive/silicon lap joint using FTIR-transmission-microscopy. Int J Adhes Adhes2004; 24: 193–200.
110.
RogersRMorrisE. On estimating activation energies with a differential scanning calorimeter. Analytical Chem1966; 38: 412–414.
111.
ZhengR, et al.Effects of a sheet metal stamping lubricant on static strength of adhesive-bonded aluminum alloys. J Adhes Sci Technol2015; 29: 1382–1402.
112.
CalvezP, et al.Mechanisms of interfacial degradation of epoxy adhesive/galvanized steel assemblies: relevance to durability. J Adhes2012; 88: 145–170.
113.
MichaloudakiMLehmannEKosteasD. Neutron imaging as a tool for the non-destructive evaluation of adhesive joints in aluminium. Int J Adhes Adhes2005; 25: 257–267.
114.
Silva-Pereira E. Exploring chirality of unnatural amino acids and peptides on water sorption and stratum corneum uptake. Reading, UK: University of Reading, 2019.
115.
Olsson-JacquesC, et al.Effect of contaminant on the durability of epoxy adhesive bonds with Alclad 2024 aluminium alloy adherends. Surface Interface Analysis1996; 24: 569–577.
116.
SodhiRN. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS):—versatility in chemical and imaging surface analysis. Analyst2004; 129: 483–487.
117.
BenninghovenA. Chemical analysis of inorganic and organic surfaces and thin films by static time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS). Angewandte Chemie Int Edition English1994; 33: 1023–1043.
118.
MaxwellIPethrickR. Dielectric studies of water in epoxy resins. J Appl Polym Sci1983; 28: 2363–2379.
119.
JelinskiL, et al.Nature of the water-epoxy interaction. Macromolecules1985; 18: 1091–1095.
120.
DrainK, et al.The effect of moisture on the strength of polycarbonate-cyanoacrylate adhesive bonds. Int J Adhes Adhes1985; 5: 133–136.
121.
VianaG, et al.Moisture and temperature degradation of double cantilever beam adhesive joints. J Adhes Sci Technol2017; 31: 1824–1838.
122.
CognardJ. Influence of water on the cleavage of adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes1988; 8: 93–99.
123.
McGeorge D. On the long term properties of steel-composite interfaces for marine applications. in fourth international conference on composite materials for offshore operations. Houston TX, 2005.
124.
LeggheE, et al.Correlation between water diffusion and adhesion loss: Study of an epoxy primer on steel. Progr Organic Coat2009; 66: 276–280.
125.
Sugiman S, Effect of adhesive thickness on the strength of steel-composite joints aged in wet environment. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, Bangka-Belitung Province, Indonesia, 29-30 August 2018. IOP Publishing.
126.
MichalskeTBunkerB. Slow fracture model based on strained silicate structures. J ApplPhys1984; 56: 2686–2693.
127.
KinlochALittleMWattsJ. The role of the interphase in the environmental failure of adhesive joints. Acta Mater2000; 48: 4543–4553.
128.
LiJ, et al.Surface treatment for improving durability of aluminum-lithium adhesive-bonded joints under hot-humid exposure. Coatings2019; 9: 346.
129.
OgawaTHongoM. Fracture mechanism and oil absorption of an oil-accommodating adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol1997; 11: 1197–1209.
130.
AndersonG, et al.The effects of silicone contamination on bond performance of various bond systems. J Adhes2010; 86: 1159–1177.
131.
JeenjitkaewCGuildF. The analysis of kissing bonds in adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2017; 75: 101–107.
132.
PeterssonL, et al.Effect of surface cleanliness of aluminium substrates on silicone rubber adhesion. J Phys D: Appl Phys2010; 44: 034011.
133.
MüllerM. Research of liquid contaminants influence on adhesive bond strength applied in agricultural machine construction. Agronomy Res2013; 11: 147–154.
134.
MarkatosD, et al.Degradation of mode-I fracture toughness of CFRP bonded joints due to release agent and moisture pre-bond contamination. J Adhes2014; 90: 156–173.
135.
HoffmannM, et al.Determination of adhesion strength of pre-bond contaminated composite-to-metal bonded joints by centrifuge tests. Compos Part B: Eng2018; 147: 114–121.
136.
Yerra V and Pilla S. Understanding resilience to contamination in the joint interface for a resistive welded joint in fiber reinforced thermoplastics. SAE Technical Paper, 2019.
