In this study, a semi-empirical model was proposed to calculate the penetration depth and cavity diameters generated by shaped charge jet into high and ultra-high strength concrete (H&UHSC) targets. A recently proposed axial penetration equation and the two-step mechanism of cavity growth were employed to determine the analysis. The predictions were validated with reference to the experiments conducted using a kind of H&UHSC named reactive powder concrete (RPC). Furthermore, the influences of the RPC compressive strength and the jet velocity on the penetration were analyzed. The results showed that the RPC targets had good protection efficiency for both penetration depth and cavity diameters as the compressive strength approaches approximately 250∼280MPa. Moreover, the radial cavity growth efficiency increased linearly with the increase of the jet velocity, while the axial penetration efficiency increased rapidly when the jet velocity was 1.0∼4.0km/s and reached the maximum at 4.0∼7.0km/s and tended to be stable as the jet velocity increased to greater than about 7.0km/s.
FengJSunWLiuZ, et al.
An armour-piercing projectile penetration in a double-layered target of ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced concrete and armour steel: experimental and numerical analyses. Mater Des2016;
102: 131–141.
LaiJGuoXZhuY.Repeated penetration and different depth explosion of ultra-high performance concrete. Int J Impact Eng2015;
84: 1–12.
4.
LiQMTongDJ.Perforation thickness and ballistic limit of concrete target subjected to rigid projectile impact. J Eng Mech2003;
129: 1083–1091.
5.
ZhangMHShimVPWLuG, et al.
Resistance of high-strength concrete to projectile impact. Int J Impact Eng2005;
31: 825–841.
6.
AlmusallamTHSiddiquiNAIqbalRA, et al.
Response of hybrid-fiber reinforced concrete slabs to hard projectile impact. Int J Impact Eng2013;
58: 17–30.
7.
KennedyRP.A review of procedures for the analysis and design of concrete structures to resist missile impact effects. Nucl Eng Des1976;
37: 183–203.
8.
WuHFangQGongJ, et al.
Projectile impact resistance of corundum aggregated UHP-SFRC. Int J Impact Eng2015;
84: 38–53.
9.
XiaoQQHuangZXZhuCS, et al.
Calculation of depth and crater diameter for the supersonic penetration of shaped charge jet into concrete. Propellants Explos Pyrotech2013;
38: 224–231.
10.
ResnyanskyAWeckertS. Response of an ultra high performance concrete to shaped charge jet. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on shock and impact loads on structures, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 2–4 December 2009, pp. 529–536.
11.
EstebanBLenhartLMRüdigerL, et al.
An evaluation of shaped charge experiments using concrete components. Int J Protect Struct2015;
6: 439–455.
12.
ZhuQFHuangZXXiaoQQ, et al.
Theoretical and experimental study of shaped charge jet penetration into high and ultra-high strength concrete targets. Int J Impact Eng2018;
122: 431–438.
13.
XiaoQQHuangZXZuXD, et al.
Penetration research of jacketed jet into concrete. Int J Impact Eng2013;
54: 246–253.
14.
SeifooriSLiaghatGH.A semianalytical and numerical study of penetration and perforation of an ogive-nose projectile into concrete targets under normal impact. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science, 2011;
225: 1782–1797.
15.
DehestaniPFathiARDanialiHRM.Numerical study of the stand-off distance and liner thickness effect on the penetration depth efficiency of shaped charge process. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019;
233: 977–986.
16.
MostertFJTerblancheCJ. Investigation of pre-cursor charge configurations and designs to allow for off-axis motion of a follow-through penetrator in a target. In: 23rd international symposium of ballistics, Tarragona, Spain, 16–20 April 2007, pp. 161–168.
17.
Dashtian GeramiNLiaghatGHRahimiGH, et al.
The effect of concrete damage on the penetration depth by the tandem projectiles. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2018;
232: 1020–1032.
18.
DavisonDPrattD. Perforator with energetic liner. In: 26th international symposium on ballistics.
Miami:
DEStech Publications, Miami, Florida, U.S.A, 12–16 September, 2011, pp. 123–131. USA: DEStech Publications.
19.
AlekseevskiiVP.Penetration of a rod into a target at high velocity.Combust Explos Shock Waves1966;
2: 63–66.
20.
TateA.A theory for the deceleration of long rods after impact. J Mech Phys Solids1967;
15: 387–399.
21.
RosenbergZDekelE.The penetration of rigid long rods–revisited. Int J Impact Eng2009;
36: 551–564.
22.
SternbergJ.Material properties determining the resistance of ceramics to high velocity penetration. J Appl Phys1989;
65: 3417–3424.
23.
RosenbergZDekelE.A numerical study of the cavity expansion process and its application to long-rod penetration mechanics. Int J Impact Eng2008;
35: 147–154.
24.
ForrestalMJTzouDY.A spherical cavity-expansion penetration model for concrete targets. Int J Solids Struct1997;
34: 4127–4146.
25.
SatapathyS.Dynamic spherical cavity expansion in brittle ceramics. Int J Solids Struct2001;
38: 5833–5845.
26.
MillerCW. Two-dimensional engineering model of jet penetration. In: Proceedings of the 15th international symposium on ballistics, Jerusalem, Israel, 21–24 May, 1995, pp. 8–21.
27.
LeeM.Cavitation and mushrooming in attack of thick targets by deforming rods. J Appl Mech2001;
68: 420–424.
28.
ElshenawyTLiQM.Influences of target strength and confinement on the penetration depth of an oil well perforator. Int J Impact Eng2013;
54: 130–137.
29.
JiaXHuangZXZuXD, et al.
Experimental study on the performance of woven fabric rubber composite armor subjected to shaped charge jet impact. Int J Impact Eng2013;
57: 134–144.
