The traditional single-arc blade used in the squirrel cage fan is simple in structure and cannot meet relevant parameterized design requirements. In order to improve the aerodynamic performance of single-arc blades of squirrel cage fans an improved Hicks-Henne function was used in this study to parameterize the blade expression in a Q35 single-suction squirrel cage fan. The AE criterion was used to optimize the Latin hypercube design, a Co-Kriging agent model was established with High and low confidence samples, and the NSGA-II algorithm was combined with the flow rate and total pressure efficiency as a multi-objective optimization goal. A set of optimal blade parameters was selected under the premise that the flow meets the design requirements. The optimized fan's total pressure and total pressure efficiency were improved at each working point. At the design working point, the fan's total pressure increased by about 23Pa, the effective air volume increased by 1.18m³/min, and the total pressure efficiency improved by 3.31%.
YangHYuPXuJ, et al.
Experimental investigations on the performance and noise characteristics of a forward-curved fan with the stepped tongue. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019;
234: 2979–2993.
2.
WangKJuYZhangC.Numerical investigation on flow mechanisms of a squirrel cage fan. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2019;
233: 3–16.
3.
SandraVSBrunoPGRafaelBT, et al.
Reduction of the aerodynamic tonal noise of a forward-curved centrifugal fan by modification of the volute tongue geometry. Appl Acoust2008;
69: 225–232.
4.
JiangBLiuHLiB, et al.
Effects of cut volute profile on squirrel cage fan performance and flow field. Adv Mech Eng2018;
10: 1–14
5.
YounsiMBakirFKouidriS, et al.
Numerical and experimental study of unsteady flow in a centrifugal fan.Power Energy2007;
17: 89–95.
6.
KimKYChaKHKimJH.Parametric study on a forward-curved blades centrifugal fan with an impeller separated by an annular plate. J Mech Sci Technol2013;
27: 1589–1595.
7.
LiuXMZhaoJLiD.Multi-coupling bionic design and noise reduction mechanism of front and back edges of single-circular equal-thickness blades. J Xi’an Jiaotong Univ2015;
49: 1–10.
8.
WangZ.Numerical simulation and airfoil research on the flow field in a double-arc blade multi-blade fan. Fan Technol2007;
45: 47–51.
9.
SheamCLinchiaLH.An integrated experimental and numerical study of forward–curved centrifugal fan. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2002;
26: 421–434.
10.
ZhangTTHuangWWangZG, et al.
A study of airfoil parameterization, modeling, and optimization based on the computational fluid dynamics method. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A Appl Phys Eng2016;
17: 632–645.
11.
VecchiaPDDanieleEDamatoE. An airfoil shape optimization technique coupling PARSEC parameterization and evolutionary algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol2014;
1: 103–110.
12.
RanMM.CFD analysis and noise prediction of multi-blade centrifugal fan. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol2007;
21: 11–15.
Bardina JE, Huang PG and Coakley TJ. Turbulence modeling validation. In: 28th AIAA fluid dynamics conference (ed. Moffett Field), Snowmass Village, USA, 21 June 1997, pp. 1997--2121. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
ANSYS CFX-11.0. ANSYS CFX-solver theory guide. Pune: ANSYS Inc, 2006.
17.
ISO 5801-1997. Fans for general purpose, part 1: performance testing using standardized airways.
18.
HicksRMHennePA.Wing design by numerical optimization. J Aircr1978;
15: 407–412.
19.
WangJJGaoZH.Analysis and improvement of Hicks-Henne airfoil parametric method. Aeronaut Comput Technol2010;
40: 46–49.
20.
ChenXK.Optimum design and application of low-Reynolds number airfoil aerodynamic shape.
Changsa:
National University of Defense Technology, 2011.
21.
SteinM.Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics1987;
29: 143–151.
22.
Audze P and Eglajs V. New approach for planning out of experiments. Prob Dyn Strengths 1977; 35: 104--107.
23.
KimJHKimJHYoonJY, et al.
Application of multi-objective optimization techniques to improve the aerodynamic performance of a tunnel ventilation jet fan. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2015;
229: 91–105.
24.
TaoRXiaoRFZhuD, et al.
Multi-objective optimization of double suction centrifugal pump. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2018;
232: 1108–1117.
25.
WenSWangJLiT, et al.
Reducing solid particle erosion of an axial fan with sweep and lean using multidisciplinary design optimization. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2014;
228: 2584–2603.
26.
PeiJWYuanSQ.Multi-point optimization on meridional shape of a centrifugal pump impeller for performance improvement. J Mech Sci Technol2016;
30: 4949–4960.
27.
HanZHZimmermannRGoertzS. A new Cokriging method for variable fidelity surrogate modeling of aerodynamic data. In: 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition (ed. Jol Brezillon). DLR, 2010, doi: 10.2514/6.2010-1225. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
28.
WangGCChengAGHuZH.Crashworthiness optimization of automobile front structure based on Kriging model. Automot Eng2011;
33: 208–212.
29.
KimJHChoiJHHusainA, et al.
Performance enhancement of axial fan blade through multi-objective optimization techniques. J Mech Sci Technol2010;
24: 2059–2066.
30.
KimJHKimJWKimKY.Axial-flow ventilation fan design through multi-objective optimization to enhance aerodynamic performance. J Fluids Eng2011;
133: 101
31.
SrinivasNDebK.Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorted in genetic algorithms, evolutionary computatio. Evol Comput1994;
2: 221–248.
