This paper addresses limitations of widely used Reynolds-averaged turbulence models (RANS) for prediction of gas turbine internal air systems. Results from direct numerical simulation (DNS), wall-resolved large-eddy simulation (LES), wall-modelled large-eddy simulation (WMLES), and RANS for benchmark test cases are compared. For rotor-stator disc cavity flows results for mean velocities, velocity fluctuations, rotor torque and laminar-turbulent transition are considered and compared with published data. For cavities between co-rotating discs attention is focused on buoyancy-driven convection in the centrifugal force field. It is concluded that WMLES is suitable for application in engine conditions, offering better accuracy than RANS in some critical applications. This confirms recently published results for turbine rim sealing and is further illustrated by application to convection in a sealed cavity at higher Rayleigh number than is practical with DNS or wall-resolved LES. The results show that the approximate near-wall treatment gives reasonable results for complex flows and extend previous studies to higher speed rig conditions where Eckert number effects become significant.
ChewJWHillsNJ.Computational fluid dynamics for turbomachinery internal air systems. Phil Trans R Soc A2007; 365: 2587–2611.
2.
ChewJWHillsNJ.Computational fluid dynamics and virtual aeroengine modelling. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2009; 223: 2821–2834.
3.
ChewJWGaoFPalermoDM.Flow mechanisms in axial turbine rim sealing. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 233: 7637–7657.
4.
OwenJMLongCA.Review of buoyancy-induced flow in rotating cavities. ASME J Turbomach2015; 137: 111001.
5.
O'MahoneyTSDHillsNJChewJW, et al. Large-eddy simulation of rim seal ingestion. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2011; 225: 2881–2891.
6.
PogorelovAMeinkeMSchröderW.Large-eddy simulation of the unsteady full 3D rim seal flow in a one-stage axial-flow turbine. Flow Turbulence Combust2019; 102: 189–220.
7.
PalermoDMGaoFAmiranteD, et al. Wall-modelled large eddy simulations of axial turbine rim sealing. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2021; 143: 061025.
8.
SunZKilfoilAChewJW, et al. Numerical simulation of natural convection in stationary and rotating cavities. ASME Paper No GT2004-53528. 2004.
9.
SunZLindbladKChewJW, et al. LES and RANS investigations into buoyancy-affected convection in a rotating cavity with a central axial throughflow. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power2007; 129: 318–325.
10.
GaoFChewJWBeardPF, et al. Large-eddy simulation of unsteady turbine rim sealing flows. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2018; 70: 160–170.
11.
GaoFPitzDBChewJW.Numerical investigation of buoyancy-induced flow in a sealed rapidly rotating disc cavity. Int J Heat Mass Transf2020; 147: 118860.
12.
GaoFChewJWMarxenO.Inertial waves in turbine rim seal flows. Phys Rev Fluids2020; 5: 024802.
13.
Bridel-BertomeuTGicquelLYStaffelbachG. Wall modeled LES and its impact on rotor/stator cavity unsteady features. ASME Paper No GT2016-57244. 2016.
14.
Da SogheRBianchiniCD’ErricoJ. Numerical characterization of flow and heat transfer in pre-swirl systems. ASME Paper No GT2017-64503. 2017.
15.
KusbeciMEChewJW.Assessment of wall-modeled LES for pre-swirl cooling systems. ASME Paper No GT2018-75112. 2018.
16.
DailyJWNeceRE.Chamber dimension effects on induced flow and frictional resistance of enclosed rotating disks. ASME J Basic Eng1960; 82: 217–230.
17.
ItohMYamadaYImaoS, et al. Experiments on turbulent flow due to an enclosed rotating disk. Exp Therm Fluid Sci1992; 5: 359–368.
18.
SéveracEPoncetSSerreE, et al. Large eddy simulation and measurements of turbulent enclosed rotor-stator flows. Phys Fluids2007; 19: 085113.
19.
ChewJWVaughanCM. Numerical predictions for the flow induced by an enclosed rotating disc. ASME Paper No 88-GT-127. 1988.
20.
VirrGPChewJWCouplandJ.Application of computational fluid dynamics to turbine disk cavities. ASME J Turbomach1994; 116: 701–708.
21.
MoghaddamERCorenDLongC, et al. A numerical investigation of moment coefficient and flow structure in a rotor-stator cavity with rotor mounted bolts. ASME Paper No GT2011-45588. 2011.
22.
ViazzoSPoncetSSerreE, et al. High-order large eddy simulations of confined rotor-stator flows. Flow Turbulence Combust2012; 88: 63–75.
23.
GermanoMPiomelliUMoinP, et al. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys Fluids1991; 3: 1760–1765.
24.
ElenaLSchiestelR.Turbulence modeling of rotating confined flows. Int J Heat Fluid Flow1996; 17: 283–289.
25.
AmiranteDHillsNJ.Large-eddy simulations of wall bounded turbulent flows using unstructured linear reconstruction techniques. ASME J Turbomach2015; 137: 051006.
26.
PitzDBChewJWMarxenO, et al. Direct numerical simulation of rotating cavity flows using a spectral element-Fourier method. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power2017; 139: 072602.
27.
PitzDB.Direct and large-eddy simulation of buoyancy-induced flows in rotating cavities. PhD Thesis, University of Surrey, UK, 2018.
28.
KakadeVULockGDWilsonM, et al. Accurate heat transfer measurements using thermochromic liquid crystal. Part 2: application to a rotating disc. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2009; 30: 950–959.
29.
JaviyaUChewJWHillsNJ, et al. CFD analysis of flow and heat transfer in a direct transfer preswirl system. ASME J Turbomach2012; 134: 031017.
30.
LingwoodRJ.Absolute instability of the Ekman layer and related rotating flows. J Fluid Mech1997; 331: 405–428.
31.
PierB.Transition near the edge of a rotating disk. J Fluid Mech2013; 737, R1.
32.
YimEChomazJMMartinandD, et al. Transition to turbulence in the rotating disk boundary layer of a rotor-stator cavity. J Fluid Mech2018; 848: 631–647.
33.
PoncetSSerreELe GalP.Revisiting the two first instabilities of the flow in an annular rotor-stator cavity. Phys Fluids2009; 21: 064106.
34.
BohnDDeukerEEmundsR, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigations of heat transfer in closed gas-filled rotating annuli. ASME J Turbomach1995; 117: 175–183.
35.
BohnDGierJ.The effect of turbulence on the heat transfer in closed gas-filled rotating annuli for different Rayleigh numbers. ASME J Turbomach 1998; 120: 824–830.
36.
PitzDBChewJWMarxenO.Large-eddy simulation of buoyancy-induced flow in a sealed rotating cavity. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power2018; 141: 021020.
37.
SainiDSandbergRD.Simulations of compressibility effects in centrifugal buoyancy-induced flow in a closed rotating cavity. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2020; 85: 108656.
38.
GaoFChewJW. Ekman layer scrubbing and shroud heat transfer in centrifugal buoyancy-driven convection. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2021; 143: 071010.
BlackburnHMSherwinSJ.Formulation of a Galerkin spectral element-Fourier method for three-dimensional incompressible flows in cylindrical geometries. J Comput Phys2004; 197: 759–778.
41.
SpaldingDB.A single formula for the “law of the wall”. ASME J Appl Mech1961; 28: 455–458.
42.
BoseSTParkGI.Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation for complex turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2018; 50: 535–561.
43.
ViegasJRRubesinMWHorstmanCC. On the use of wall functions as boundary conditions for two-dimensional separated compressible flows. AIAA Paper No AIAA-85-0180. 1985.
44.
SainiDSandbergRD. Large eddy simulations of high Rossby number flow in the high pressure compressor inter-disk cavity. ASME Paper No GT2020-14463. 2020.
45.
PiomelliUMoinPFerzigerJH.Model consistency in large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows. Phys Fluids1988; 31: 1884–1891.
46.
LenormandESagautPTa PhuocL.Large eddy simulation of subsonic and supersonic channel flow at moderate Reynolds number. Int J Numer Meth Fluids2000; 32: 369–406.
47.
CahuzacABoudetJBorgnatP, et al. Smoothing algorithms for mean-flow extraction in large-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. Phys Fluids2010; 22: 125104.
48.
GaoFMaWZamboniniG, et al. Large-eddy simulation of 3-D corner separation in a linear compressor cascade. Phys Fluids2015; 27: 085105.
49.
JacksonRWLubertiDTangH, et al. Measurement and analysis of buoyancy-induced heat transfer in aero-engine compressor rotors. ASME Paper No GT2020-14427. 2020.
