Nowadays, with various advancements in the railway industry and increasing speed of trains, the design of railway tracks and vehicles has become vitally important. One of the frequent problems of ballasted tracks is the existence of unsupported sleepers. This phenomenon occurs due to the lack of ballast underneath the sleepers. Here, a model is presented, in which a flexible track model in a multibody dynamics program is developed, in order to study the dynamic behavior of a vehicle. By utilizing the model, it is feasible to simulate unsupported sleepers on the flexible track including rail, sleeper, and ballast components. In order to verify the results of numerical model, a field test is performed. Findings indicate that, in the case of a single unsupported sleeper through the track, the ride comfort index increased by 100% after increasing the train speed from 30 to 110 km/h. Moreover, when it is needed to have ride comfort index improvement over the uncomfortable level, the vehicle speed should be less than 70 km/h and 50 km/h for tracks with one unsupported sleeper and two unsupported sleepers, respectively.
BezinYIwnickiSDCavallettiM, et al. An investigation of sleeper voids using a flexible track model integrated with railway multi-body dynamics. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2009; 223: 597–607.
6.
ZakeriJAGhorbaniV.Investigation on dynamic behavior of railway track in transition zone. J Mech Eng2011; 25: 287–292.
7.
Blanco-LorenzoJSantamariaJVadilloEG, et al. Dynamic comparison of different types of slab track and ballasted track using a flexible track model. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2011; 225: 574–592.
8.
RezaeiEDahlbergT.Dynamic behaviour of an in situ partially supported concrete railway sleeper. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2011; 225: 501–508.
9.
ShiJChanAHBurrowMPN.Influence of unsupported sleepers on the dynamic response of a heavy haul railway embankment. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2013; 227: 657–667.
10.
ZakeriJAFattahiMGhanimoghadamMM.Influence of unsupported and partially supported sleepers on dynamic responses of train–track interaction. J Mech Sci Technol2015; 29: 2289–2295.
11.
ShahrakiMWarnakulasooriyaCWittKJ.Numerical study of transition zone between ballasted and ballastless railway track. J Transp Geotech2015; 3: 58–67.
12.
ThompsonHBSussmannTRStarkTD, et al. Non-Invasive monitoring of track system gaps. In: Conference of railway engineering, Edinburgh, Acotland, 30 June to 1 July 2015.
13.
MosayebiSAZakeriJAEsmaeiliM.Effects of train bogie patterns on the mechanical performance of ballasted railway tracks with unsupported sleepers. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2018; 232: 238–248.
14.
MosayebiSAZakeriJAEsmaeiliM.Vehicle/track dynamic interaction considering developed railway substructure models. J Struct Eng Mech2017; 61: 775–784.
15.
AceitunoJFWangPWangL, et al. Influence of rail flexibility in a wheel/rail wear prediction model. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2017; 231: 57–74.
16.
ShabanaAA.Geometrically accurate floating frame of reference finite elements for the small deformation problem. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-Body Dynamics2017; 232: 286–292.
17.
JiZYangGLiuY, et al. Analysis of vertical vibration characteristics of the vehicle-flexible track coupling system under wind load and track irregularity. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2018; 232: 1–12.
18.
SunYGuoYChenZ, et al. Effect of differential ballast settlement on dynamic response of vehicle-track coupled systems. Int J Struct Stab Dyn2018; 18: 1850091–1850091.
19.
EN 13674-1. Railway applications - Track - Rail - Part 1: Vignole railway rails 46 kg/m and above.2017.
LiYXuXZhouY, et al. An interactive method for the analysis of the simulation of vehicle–bridge coupling vibration using ANSYS and SIMPACK. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2018; 232: 663–679.
22.
ChenMLuoYZhangB.Dynamic characteristic analysis of irregularity under turnout by vehicle-turnout rigid-flexible coupling model. AMR2014; 945–949: 591–595.
23.
LanczosC.An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators. J Res Natl Bur Stand1950; 45: 255–282.
24.
SanchezRRBuchschmidMMüllerG. Model order reduction in structural dynamics. In: VII European Congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering, ECCOMAS Congress, Crete Island, Greece, 5–10 June 2016.
EscalonaJLChamorroRRecueroAM.Description of methods for the eigenvalue analysis of railroad vehicles including track flexibility. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn2012; 7: 041009–041001.
28.
RecueroAMEscalonaJLChamorroR.A trajectory frame-based dynamic formulation for railroad vehicles simulation. Int J Railw Technol2012; 1: 21–44.
29.
KnotheKStichelS.Rail vehicle dynamics. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2017.
30.
RecueroAMEscalonaJL.Application of the trajectory coordinate system and the moving modes method approach to railroad dynamics using Krylov subspaces. J. Sound Vib2013; 332: 5177–5191.
31.
WollströmM.Internal noise and vibration in railway vehicles – A pilot study. Division of Railway Technology. Department of Vehicle Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, 1998.
32.
HelbigWSperlingE.Verfahren zur beurteilung der laufeigenschaften von eisenbahnwagen. Organ für die Fortschritte des Eisenbahnwesens1941; 96: 177–187.
33.
ZakeriJAFeiziMMShadfarM, et al. Sensitivity analysis on dynamic response of railway vehicle and ride index over curved bridges. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2016; 231: 1–12.
