The torque extrapolation of the excavator internal combustion engine (ICE) is unknown and challenging. In this paper, an extrapolation framework for ICE torque of excavator is proposed. Data pre-processing, distribution estimation, load extrapolation, and damage evaluation are included in the framework. In estimating measurements, bivariate diffusion-based kernel density estimation is used to obtain the probability density. The cumulative cycle frequency and pseudo damage are compared with the results obtained by the other extrapolation methods. The results show that the proposed method can realize reasonable extrapolation. This extrapolation process can provide a reference for other engineering equipment in cyclic operation.
LionSMichosCNVlaskosI, et al. A review of waste heat recovery and organic Rankine cycles (ORC) in on-off highway vehicle Heavy Duty Diesel Engine applications. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2017; 79: 691–708.
YuePMaJZhouC, et al. A fatigue damage accumulation model for reliability analysis of engine components under combined cycle loadings. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2020; 43(8): 1880–1892.
4.
CastresanaJGabiñaGMartinL, et al. Comparative performance and emissions assessments of a single-cylinder diesel engine using artificial neural network and thermodynamic simulation. Appl Therm Eng2021; 185: 116343.
5.
Morkus ČvutJ. Load spectrum of a car powertrain. J Middle Eur Construct Des Cars2012; 10(3): 31–38.
6.
MenYYuHYuH. Development of block loading spectrum for car powertrain rig test correlated with customers’ usage. Adv Mech Eng2017; 9(9): 1687814017727472.
7.
WangJChenHLiY, et al. A review of the extrapolation method in load spectrum compiling. Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering2016; 62(1): 60–75.
8.
ShaoXSongZYinY, et al. Statistical distribution modelling and parameter identification of the dynamic stress spectrum of a tractor front driven axle. Biosyst Eng2021; 205: 152–163.
9.
WangQZhouJGongD, et al. Fatigue life assessment method of bogie frame with time-domain extrapolation for dynamic stress based on extreme value theory. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 159: 107829.
10.
WangQZhouJWangT, et al. Extrapolation of the dynamic stress spectrum of train bogie frame based on kernel density estimation method. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2021; 44(7): 1783–1798.
11.
WuHLiFWuP, et al. Application of kernel density estimation to extrapolating the fatigue loads on a high-speed train. Veh Syst Dyn2020; 58(8): 1212–1225.
12.
WuHWuPLiF, et al. Fatigue analysis of the gearbox housing in high-speed trains under wheel polygonization using a multibody dynamics algorithm. Eng Fail Anal2019; 100: 351–364.
13.
MalecPSchienleM. Nonparametric kernel density estimation near the boundary. Comput Stat Data Anal2014; 72: 57–76.
14.
JohannessonPThomasJJ. Extrapolation of Rainflow matrices. Extremes2001; 4(3): 241–262.
15.
LiGWangSHeJ, et al. Compilation of load spectrum of machining center spindle and application in fatigue life prediction. J Mech Sci Technol2019; 33(4): 1603–1613.
16.
JinTYanCGuoJ, et al. Compilation of drilling load spectrum based on the characteristics of drilling force. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. Epub ahead of print 2March2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-08977-9
17.
WangYWangLZongJ, et al. Research on loading method of tractor PTO based on dynamic load spectrum. Agriculture2021; 11(10): 982.
18.
WeiWDourraHZhuG. Vehicle tire traction torque estimation using a dual extended Kalman filter. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2022; 144(3): 031004.
19.
QinCShiGTaoJ, et al. Precise cutterhead torque prediction for shield tunneling machines using a novel hybrid deep neural network. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 151: 107386.
20.
BotevZIGrotowskiJFKroeseDP. Kernel density estimation via diffusion. Ann Stat2010; 38(5): 2916–2957.
21.
MaSSunSWangB, et al. Estimating load spectra probability distributions of train bogie frames by the diffusion-based kernel density method. Int J Fatigue2020; 132: 105352.
22.
HärdleWKMüllerMSperlichS, et al. Nonparametric and semiparametric models. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.
23.
SilvermanBW. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.
24.
WandMPJonesMC. Kernel smoothing. New York, NY: CRC Press, 1994.
25.
SilvermanBW. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, 1986.
26.
ScottDW. Multivariate density estimation: theory, practice, and visualization. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
27.
JanssenPSwanepoelJVeraverbekeN. A note on the behaviour of a kernel-smoothed kernel density estimator. Stat Probab Lett2020; 158: 108663.
28.
ZougabNAdjabiSKokonendjiCC. Bayesian estimation of adaptive bandwidth matrices in multivariate kernel density estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal2014; 75: 28–38.
29.
HeidenreichNBSchindlerASperlichS. Bandwidth selection for kernel density estimation: a review of fully automatic selectors. AStA Adv Stat Anal2013; 97(4): 403–433.
30.
DuongT. Ks: kernel density estimation and kernel discriminant analysis for multivariate data in R. J Stat Softw2007; 21(7): 1–16.
31.
WandMPJonesMC. Comparison of smoothing parameterizations in bivariate kernel density estimation. J Am Stat Assoc1993; 88(422): 520–528.
32.
WangQZambomAZ. Subsampling-extrapolation bandwidth selection in bivariate kernel density estimation. J Stat Comput Simul2019; 89(9): 1740–1759.
33.
ChacónJEDuongTWandMP. Asymptotics for general multivariate kernel density derivative estimators. Stat Sin2011; 21(2): 807–840.
34.
GramackiAGramackiJ. FFT-based fast bandwidth selector for multivariate kernel density estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal2017; 106: 27–45.
35.
DuongTHazeltonML. Cross-validation bandwidth matrices for multivariate kernel density estimation. Scand J Stat2005; 32(3): 485–506.
36.
ChacónJEDuongT. Data-driven density derivative estimation, with applications to nonparametric clustering and bump hunting. Electron J Stat2013; 7: 499–532.
37.
GramackiA. Nonparametric kernel density estimation and its computational aspects. Cham: Springer, 2018.
38.
ChacónJEDuongT. Multivariate plug-in bandwidth selection with unconstrained pilot bandwidth matrices. Test2010; 19(2): 375–398.
39.
DuongTHazeltonM. Plug-in bandwidth matrices for bivariate kernel density estimation. J Nonparametr Stat2003; 15: 17–30.
40.
DuongT. Bandwidth selectors for multivariate kernel density estimation. Perth: University of Western Australia, 2004.
41.
JohannessonPSpeckertM. Guide to load analysis for durability in vehicle engineering. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
42.
KarunamuniRJAlbertsT. On boundary correction in kernel density estimation. Stat Methodol2005; 2(3): 191–212.
43.
CowlingAHallP. On pseudodata methods for removing boundary effects in kernel density estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser B1996; 58(3): 551–563.
44.
KarunamuniRJZhangS. Some improvements on a boundary corrected kernel density estimator. Stat Probab Lett2008; 78(5): 499–507.
45.
WangJLiYJiangZ. Non-parametric load extrapolation based on load extension for semi-axle of wheel loader. Adv Mech Eng2017; 9(3): 1687814017690073.
46.
BérangerBDuongTPerkins-KirkpatrickSE, et al. Tail density estimation for exploratory data analysis using kernel methods. J Nonparametr Stat2019; 31(1): 144–174.
47.
KroeseDPTaimreTBotevZI. Handbook of Monte Carlo methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2013. Vol. 706.
48.
KimYJChungSOChoiCH. Effects of gear selection of an agricultural tractor on transmission and PTO load during rotary tillage. Soil Tillage Res2013; 134: 90–96.
