Dynamic performance of the power transmission line inspection robots (PTLIRs) is of great importance, which would heavily affect the stability of the robot during obstacle avoidance. In this paper, a detailed dynamic performance analysis method of PTLIR is presented by considering the effect on the mechatronic system caused by obstacle avoidance. First, the dynamic modeling of the robot and control system model of the revolute joint are given based on the mechatronic modeling. Then, dynamic characteristics of mechanical subsystem are analyzed by studying the change of the inertia matrix during obstacle avoidance. Next, to analyze the control subsystem performance, three kinds of pole assignment methods which used to tune the controller parameter are compared. Finally, a series of numerical simulations are performed, which prove the time-varying characteristic of load inertia during obstacle avoidance has a great influence on the dynamic performance of the robot, moreover, the changes of natural angular frequency and damping coefficient parameters could be used to evaluate dynamic performance. The main results of the paper can provide an effective tool to analysis dynamic performance of the PTLIR, which is meaningful to improve inspection stability.
ZhaoTChenYDianS, et al. General Type-2 fuzzy gain scheduling PID controller with application to power-Line Inspection Robots. Int J Fuzzy Syst2020; 22: 181–200.
2.
ChenMTianYXingS, et al. Environment Perception Technologies for Power Transmission Line Inspection Robots. J Sens2021; 2021: 1–16.
3.
AlhassanABZhangXShenH, et al. Power transmission line inspection robots: A review, trends and challenges for future research. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst2020; 118: 105862.
4.
HamelinPMiralle’sFLambertG, et al. Discrete-time control of LineDrone: An assisted tracking and landing UAV for live power line inspection and maintenance. In: International conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), Atlanta, GA USA, 1114 June 2019, pp.292–298. New York: IEEE.
5.
YangLFanJLiuY, et al. A review on state-of-the-Art power line inspection techniques. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas2020; 69(12): 9350–9365.
6.
YangGLiEFanC, et al. Modeling and control of a bi-brachiate inspection robot for power transmission lines. In: IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation (ICMA), Xi’an, 4–7 August 2010, pp.1036–1041. New York: IEEE.
7.
ShruthiCMSudheerAPJoyML. Dual arm electrical transmission line robot: motion through straight and jumper cable. Automatika2019; 60: 207–226.
8.
YuSYeCTaoG, et al. Design and analysis of a modular rope-climbing robot with the finger-wheeled mechanism. J Mech Sci Technol2021; 35: 2197–2207.
9.
TaoGFangL. A multi-unit serial inspection robot for power transmission lines. Ind Rob2019; 46(2): 223–234.
10.
WangHLiEYangG, et al. Design of an inspection robot system with hybrid operation modes for power transmission lines. In: IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation (ICMA), Tianjin, China, 4–7 August 2019, pp.2571–2576. New York: IEEE.
11.
ShakhatrehHSawalmehAHAl-FuqahaA, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): a survey on civil applications and key research challenges. IEEE Access2019; 7: 48572–48634.
12.
SampedroCRodriguez-VazquezJRodriguez-RamosA, et al. Deep learning-based system for automatic recognition and diagnosis of electrical insulator strings. IEEE Access2019; 7(99): 101283–101308.
13.
PienrojPSchönbornSBirkeR. Exploring deep reinforcement learning for autonomous powerline tracking. IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), Paris, France, 29 April 2019–02 May 2019, pp. 496–501.
14.
ZhangHYangWYuH, et al. Combined convolutional and structured features for power line detection in uav images, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Yokohama, Japan, 28 July –02 August 2019, pp. 1306–1309.
15.
ZhaoLWangXYaoH, et al. Power line extraction from aerial images using object-based Markov random field with anisotropic weighted penalty. IEEE Access2019; 7: 125333–125356.
16.
LanMZhangYZhangL, et al. Defect detection from uav images based on region-based cnns. In: IEEE international conference on data mining workshops (ICDMW), Singapore, 17–20 November 2018, pp.385–390. New York: IEEE.
17.
ChenBMiaoX. Distribution line pole detection and counting based on YOLO using UAV Inspection Line Video. J Electr Eng Technol2020; 15(1): 441–448.
18.
WangHYangGLiE, et al. High-voltage power transmission tower detection based on faster R-CNN and YOLO-V3. In: Chinese control conference (CCC), Guangzhou, China, 27–30 July 2019, pp.8750–8755. New York: IEEE.
19.
WangLWangDWuJ. Dynamics evaluation of parallel manipulators considering gravity and driving force uniformity. Proc IMechE, Part C2020; 234(16): 3143–3153.
20.
AsadaH. Dynamic analysis and design of robot manipulators using inertia ellipsoids. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Atlanta, GA, 13–15 March 1984, pp.94–102. New York: IEEE.
21.
YoshikawaT. Dynamic manipulability of robot manipulators. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), St. Louis, MO, 25–28 March 1985, pp.1033–1038. New York: IEEE.
22.
NabaviSNAkbarzadehAEnferadiJ, et al. homogeneous payload specific performance index for robot manipulators based on the kinetic energy. Mech Mach Theory2018; 130: 330–345.
23.
YaoJYangQGaoS, et al. Optimization design for a jumping leg robot based on generalized inertia ellipsoid. Robotica2012; 30(7): 1213–1219.
24.
AzadMBabičJMistryM. Effects of the weighting matrix on dynamic manipulability of robots. Auton Robots2019; 43: 1867–1879.
25.
LiJZuoSZhangL, et al. Mechanical Design and performance analysis of a novel parallel robot for ankle rehabilitation. J Mech Robot2020; 12(5): 051007.
26.
KhatibO. Inertial properties in robotic manipulation: an object-level framework. Int J Rob Res1995; 14(1): 19–36.
27.
WuJYeHYuG, et al. A novel dynamic evaluation method and its application to a 4-DOF parallel manipulator. Mech Mach Theory2022; 168: 104627.
28.
WangDWangLWuJ. Physics-based mechatronics modeling and application of an industrial-grade parallel tool head. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 148: 107158.
29.
FengBZhangDMeiX, et al. Investigation of the controller parameter optimisation for a servomechanism. Proc IMechE, Part B2015; 229: 98–110.
30.
HanifzadeganMNagamuneR. Contouring control of CNC machine tools based on linear parameter-varying controllers. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2016; 21(5): 2522–2530.
31.
LiXShangDLiF, et al. The climbing performance analysis of a robot for power line inspection with retractable double serial manipulators. Proc IMechE, Part C2022; 236(9): 4946–4961.
32.
WangSNaJYuH, et al. Finite time parameter estimation-based adaptive predefined performance control for servo mechanisms. ISA Trans2019; 87: 174–186.
33.
ShangDLiXYinM, et al. Vibration suppression for two-inertia system with variable-length flexible load based on neural network compensation sliding mode controller and angle-independent method. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/ TMECH.2022.3206342
34.
KawaiYYokokuraYOhishiK, et al. High-robust force control for environmental stiffness variation based on duality of two-inertia system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2021; 68(1): 850–860.
35.
JungHJeonKKangJG, et al. Iterative feedback tuning of cascade control of two-inertia system. IEEE Control Syst Lett2021; 5(3): 785–790.
36.
KarimiAButcherMLongchampR. Model-free precompensator tuning based on the correlation approach. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2008; 16(5): 1013–1020.
37.
TeschDEckhardDBazanellaAS. Iterative feedback tuning for cascade systems. In: European control conference (ECC), Aalborg, Denmark, 1–29 July 2016, pp.495–500. New York: IEEE.
38.
ZhangYHuangXWangA, et al. A position and speed controller tuning method of permanent magnet synchronous linear motor based on gain identification. IEEE Trans Power Electron2022; 37(10): 11716–11724.
39.
LiXShangDLiH, et al. Resonant suppression method based on PI control for serial manipulator Servo Drive System. Sci Prog2020; 103(3): 969–978.
40.
ZhangXLiuYBransonDT, et al. Variable-gain control for continuum robots based on velocity sensitivity. Mech Mach Theory2022; 168: 104618.
41.
WaiRJ. Development of new training algorithms for neuro-wavelet systems on the robust control of induction servo motor drive. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2002; 49(6): 1323–1341.
42.
JiangZHuangMTangX, et al. Elasto-geometrical calibration of six-DOF serial robots using multiple identification models. Mech Mach Theory2021; 157: 104211.
43.
ZhaoJZhaoZYangX, et al. Inverse kinematics and workspace analysis of a novel SSRMS-type reconfigurable space manipulator with two lockable passive telescopic links. Mech Mach Theory2023; 180: 105152.
44.
MaHYinFWuZ, et al. Nonlinear vibration response analysis of a rotor-blade system with blade-tip rubbing. Nonlinear Dyn2016; 84: 1225–1258.
45.
DuZLiangYYanZ, et al. Human-robot interaction control of a haptic master manipulator used in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgical robot system. Mech Mach Theory2021; 156: 104132.
46.
LiuZWuJWangD. An engineering-oriented motion accuracy fluctuation suppression method of a hybrid spray-painting robot considering dynamics. Mech Mach Theory2019; 131: 62–74.
47.
ZhangGFurushoJ. Speed control of two-inertia system by PI/PID control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2000; 47(3): 603–609.
48.
WangLWangDWuJ. Dynamic performance analysis of parallel manipulators based on two-inertia-system. Mech Mach Theory2019; 137: 237–253.
49.
WangDZhangSWangL, et al. Developing a ball screw drive system of high-speed machine tool considering dynamics. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2022; 69(5): 4966–4976.
