Hexapod robots are widely used in applications such as search and rescue, exploration, and surveillance due to their improved mobility and stability on uneven terrain. However, conventional hexapod robots typically suffer from issues such as heavy weight and complex design, which limits their effectiveness in certain scenarios. In this paper, we propose a new hexapod robot that addresses the issues of weight and complexity often associated with conventional hexapod robots. Our proposed design uses telescopic legs connected to pivot joints at the hips, resulting in a two-DOFs-leg configuration. The robot’s six legs are aligned with a parallelepiped body, with each leg configured with a revolute joint and a prismatic joint. With a total of twelve degrees of freedom (DOFs), the proposed robot can move in a straight line or turn. Our solution for stabilizing the robot’s horizontally oriented body on uneven terrain, using analytical kinematics, inverse kinematics, and geometric analysis, is a valuable contribution. Additionally, we present simulation of path generation and gait design for various inclined planes and stairs using a virtual prototype modeled in MATLAB/Simulink Simscape Multibody. The results of our simulated and physical prototype experiments demonstrate that the proposed design and body control algorithm effectively maintain the orientation of the robot’s body usually stable while it moves on different types of surfaces. Overall, our proposed hexapod robot using telescopic legs offers a promising solution for achieving improved mobility and stability on uneven terrain, with reduced weight and complexity compared to conventional hexapod robots.
ZhangXHuangYWangS, et al. Hierarchical autonomous switching control of a multi-modes omnidirectional mobile robot. Mechatronics2021; 80: 102692.
2.
RajRKosA.A comprehensive study of mobile robot: history, developments, applications, and future research perspectives. Appl Sci2022; 12: 6951.
3.
ČížekPZoulaMFaiglJ.Design, construction, and rough-terrain locomotion control of novel hexapod walking robot with four degrees of freedom per leg. IEEE Access2021; 9: 17866–17881.
4.
ZhongGChenLDengH.A performance oriented novel design of hexapod robots. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2017; 22(3): 1435–1443.
5.
FaiglJČížekP.Adaptive locomotion control of hexapod walking robot for traversing rough terrains with position feedback only. Robot Auton Syst2019; 116: 136–147.
6.
PrattJ.Exploiting inherent robustness and natural dynamics in the control of bipedal walking robots. Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Science Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2000.
7.
RobinsonDWPrattJEPaluskaDJ, et al. Series elastic actuator development for a biomimetic walking robot. In: 1999 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (Cat. No.99TH8399), Atlanta, GA, 19–23 September 1999, pp.561–568. New York, NY: IEEE.
8.
PrattJEPrattGA.Exploiting natural dynamics in the control of a 3D bipedal walking simulation. In: Proceedings of the international conference on climbing and walking robots (CLAWAR99), Flagship City of Portsmouth, Portland Building, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom, 13–15 September 1999.
GengTPorrBWörgötterF.Fast biped walking with a sensor-driven neuronal controller and real-time online learning. Int J Robot Res2006; 25(3): 243–259.
11.
GengTPorrBWörgötterF.Fast biped walking with a reflexive controller and real-time policy searching. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on neural information processing systems (NIPS’05), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5–8 December 2005, pp.427–434.
12.
RenPMorazzaniIHongD.Forward and inverse displacement analysis of a novel three-legged mobile robot based on the kinematics of in-parallel manipulators. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2007 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, 2007. 8: 31st mechanisms and robotics conference, Parts A and B, Las Vegas, Nevada, 4–7 September 2007, pp.1041–1052. New York, NY: ASME.
13.
HeastonJHongDMorazzaniI, et al. STriDER: self-excited tripedal dynamic experimental robot. In: Proceedings 2007 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Rome, Italy, 10–14 April 2007, pp.2776–2777. New York, NY: IEEE.
14.
SongYSSittiM.STRIDE: a highly maneuverable and non-tethered water strider robot. In: Proceedings 2007 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Roma, Italy, 10–14 April 2007, pp.980–984. New York, NY: IEEE.
15.
SuzukiSKanoTIjspeertAJ, et al. Sprawling quadruped robot driven by decentralized control with cross-coupled sensory feedback between legs and trunk. Front Neuro Robot2021; 14: 116.
16.
McGheeRB.Some finite state aspects of legged locomotion. Math Biosci1968; 2(1–2): 67–84.
17.
McGheeRBFrankAA.On the stability properties of quadruped creeping gaits. Math Biosci1968; 3: 331–351.
18.
McGheeR.Control of legged locomotion systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th automatic control conference, Boston, MA, 24–30 August 1977, pp.205–215. New York, NY: IEEE.
19.
HiroseS.A study of design and control of a quadruped walking vehicle. Int J Robot Res1984; 3(2): 113–133.
20.
HiroseSKikuchiHUmetaniY.The standard circular gait of a quadruped walking vehicle. Adv Robot1986; 1(2): 143–164.
21.
HiroseSInoueSYonedaK.The whisker sensor and the transmission of multiple sensor signals. Adv Robot1989; 4(2): 105–117.
22.
KatoKHiroseH.Development of the quadruped walking robot, TITAN-IX — mechanical design concept and application for the humanitarian de-mining robot. Adv Robot2012; 15(2): 191–204.
23.
RaibertM.Legged robots that balance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2000.
24.
RaibertMChepponisMBrownM.Running on four legs as though they were one. IEEE J Robot Autom1986; 2(2): 70–82.
25.
WensingPMWangASeokS, et al. Proprioceptive actuator design in the MIT Cheetah: impact mitigation and high-bandwidth physical interaction for dynamic legged robots. IEEE Trans Robot2017; 33(3): 509–522.
26.
SeokSWangAChuahMY, et al. Design principles for energy-efficient legged locomotion and implementation on the MIT Cheetah robot. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2015; 20(3): 1117–1129.
27.
HutterMGehringCJudD, et al. ANYmal: a highly mobile and dynamic quadrupedal robot. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Daejeon, Korea, 9–14 October 2016, pp.38–44. New York, NY: IEEE.
28.
CoelhoJRibeiroFDiasB, et al. Trends in the control of hexapod robots: a survey. Robotics2021; 10(3): 100.
29.
KrotkovEPSimmonsRGWhittakerWL.Ambler: performance of a six-legged planetary rover. Acta Astronaut1995; 35(1): 75–81.
30.
DelcomynFNelsonME.Architectures for a biomimetic hexapod robot. Robot Auton Syst2000; 30(1–2): 5-15.
31.
NelsonGMQuinnRDBachmannRJ, et al. Design and simulation of a cockroach-like hexapod robot. In: Proceedings of international conference on robotics and automation, Albuquerque, NM, 25–25 April 1997, vol.2, pp.1106–1111. New York, NY: IEEE.
32.
ChenLZhongGLiuZ, et al. A novel hexapod robot: design and mobility analysis. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation, Harbin, China, 7–10 August 2016, pp.2094–2098. New York, NY: IEEE.
33.
RoySSSinghAKPratiharDK.Estimation of optimal feet forces and joint torques for on-line control of six-legged robot. Robot Comput Integr Manuf2011; 27: 910–917.
34.
JianhuaG.Design and kinematic simulation for six-DOF leg mechanism of hexapod robot. In: 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, Kunming, China, 17–20 December 2006, pp.625–629. New York, NY: IEEE.
35.
AgheliMQuLNestingerSS.SHeRo: scalable hexapod robot for maintenance repair and operations. Robot Comput Integr Manuf2014; 30: 478–488.
36.
FućekLKovačićZBogdanS.Analytically founded yaw control algorithm for walking on uneven terrain applied to a hexapod robot. Int J Adv Robot Syst2019; 16(3): 1–17.
37.
SaranliUBuehlerMKoditschekDE.RHex: a simple and highly mobile hexapod robot. Int J Robot Res2001; 20(7): 616.
38.
SunJRenJJinY, et al. Hexapod robot kinematics modeling and tripod gait design based on the foot end trajectory. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO), Macau, Macao, 5–8 December 2017, pp.2611–2616. New York, NY: IEEE.
TozMKüçükS.Development of derivation of inverse Jacobian matrices for 195 6-DOF GSP mechanisms. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci2016; 24(5): 4142–4153.
41.
TozMKucukS.Parallel manipulator software tool for design, analysis, and simulation of 195 GSP mechanisms. Comput Appl Eng Educ2015; 23(6): 931–946.
42.
WuJYuGGaoY, et al. Mechatronics modeling and vibration analysis of a 2-DOF parallel manipulator in a 5-DOF hybrid machine tool. Mech Mach Theory2018; 121: 430–445.
43.
WuJWangJWangL, et al. Dynamics, and control of a planar 3-DOF parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy. Mech Mach Theory2009; 44(4): 835–849.
44.
WuJYeHYuG, et al. A novel dynamic evaluation method and its application to a 4-DOF parallel manipulator. Mech Mach Theory2022; 168: 104627.
45.
AyizCKucukS.The kinematics of industrial robot manipulators based on the exponential rotational matrices. In: 2009 IEEE international symposium on industrial electronics, Seoul, Korea, 5–8 July 2009, pp. 977–982. New York, NY: IEEE.
46.
SongSMChoiBS.The optimally stable ranges of 2n-legged wave gaits. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern1990; 20(4): 888–902.
