Process optimization and finite element modeling in magnetorheological abrasive finishing of SS-316L with surface characterization

Abstract

This study explores the potential of Magnetorheological Abrasive Finishing (MRAF) for ultra-precision finishing of SS-316L using a high-performance Nd-Fe-B (N-35 grade) magnetic tool. Key parameters, including the relationship between normal force (Fn) and working gap, magnetic flux distribution, and finishing spot area, were analyzed using ANSYS 2020 R1^® Magnetostatic module simulations. Material removal rate (MRR) and surface roughness (Ra) were optimized through response surface methodology (RSM) using a central composite design (CCD) with two primary input factors: SiC abrasive volume fraction (5%, 10%, 15%) and abrasive mesh size (800, 1000, 1200). Statistical analysis via ANOVA revealed a significant influence of process variables, achieving a remarkable surface finish with a minimum Ra of 52 nm in just 60 min, utilizing an MR fluid with 10% SiC abrasives. Microscopic and spectroscopic evaluations confirmed enhanced surface morphology and microstructural refinement. Moreover, bioactivity studies in simulated body fluid highlighted improved hydroxyapatite layer formation on the finished SS-316L samples, underscoring the process’s potential for biomedical applications.

Keywords

Magnetorheological abrasive finishing MR fluid biomaterial finishing SS-316L nanofinishing response surface methodology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Morsiya

A review on parameters affecting properties of biomaterial SS 316L. Aust J Mech Eng 2022; 20(3): 803–813.

ASTM Standard: F2083-11. Standard specifications for total knee prosthesis. 2011.

Ramsden

Allen

Stephenson

, et al. The design and manufacture of biomedical surfaces. CIRP Ann 2007; 56(2): 687–711.

Shen

Fang

Kang

Tribological performance of bioimplants: a comprehensive review. Nanotechnol Precis Eng 2018; 1: 107–122.

Gallo

Goodman

Konttinen

, et al. Osteolysis around total knee arthoplasty: a review of pathogenetic mechanisms. Acta Biomater 2013; 9(9): 8046–8058.

El-Hofy

. Fundamentals of machining processes: conventional and nonconventional processes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2018.

Jha

Jain

VK.

Modeling and simulation of surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Wear 2006; 261(7–8): 856–866.

Sidpara

Das

Jain

VK.

Rheological characterization of magnetorheological finishing fluid. Mater Manuf Process 2009; 24(12): 1467–1478.

Das

Jain

Ghoshdastidar

PS.

Analysis of magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2008; 38(5-6): 613–621.

10.

Khan

Jha

Synthesis of polishing fluid and novel approach for nanofinishing of copper using ball-end magnetorheological finishing process. Mater Manuf Process 2018; 33(11): 1150–1159.

11.

Prakash

Singh

Pramanik

, et al. Experimental investigation into nano-finishing of β-TNTZ alloy using magnetorheological fluid magnetic abrasive finishing process for orthopedic applications. J Mater Res Technol 2021; 11: 600–617.

12.

Sidpara

Jain

VK.

Rheological properties and their correlation with surface finish quality in MR fluid-based finishing process. Mach Sci Technol 2014; 18(3): 367–385.

13.

Singh

AK.

Magnetorheological finishing of variable diametric external surface of the tapered cylindrical workpieces for functionality improvement. J Manuf Process 2021; 61: 153–172.

14.

Long

Kamimura

Marui

, et al. Iron-particle-polishing-tool behavior during magnetic field-assisted finishing of fused silica. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2022; 38: 675–683.

15.

Kumar

Das

Impact of different magnetorheological fluid compositions on poppet valve profile polishing. Precis Eng 2022; 76: 75–87.

16.

Montgomery

. Design and analysis of experiments. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2017.

17.

Fan

Tian

Zhou

, et al. Enhanced magnetic abrasive finishing of Ti–6Al–4V using shear thickening fluids additives. Precis Eng 2020; 64: 300–306.

18.

Jiang

Chen

Wang

, et al. Investigation on rheological characteristics of magnetorheological shear thickening fluids mixed with micro CBN abrasive particles. Mater Res Express 2020; 7(10): 106503.

19.

Heng

Song

Mun

SD.

A novel methodology of MAF process via a multi-axis/multi-faceted polishing technique for enhancing surface quality of artificial hip joint component. J Magn Magn Mater 2023; 570: 101836.

20.

Singh

Pandey

A review on magnetic abrasive finishing. Mater Today Proc 2016; 234: 125–137.

21.

Tian

Shi

Fan

, et al. Experimental investigations on magnetic abrasive finishing of Ti-6Al-4V using a multiple pole-tip finishing tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020; 106(7-8): 3071–3080.

22.

Barman

Das

Simulation and experimental investigation of finishing forces in magnetic field assisted finishing process. Mater Manuf Process 2018; 33(11): 1223–1232.

23.

Barman

Das

Pathak

VK.

Optimization of magnetic field assisted finishing process during nanofinishing of titanium alloy (grade-5) implant using soft computing approaches. Int J Model Simul 2022; 42(6): 920–935.

24.

Kokubo

Takadama

How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?

Biomaterials 2006; 27(15): 2907–2915.

25.

Gajalakshmi

Senthilkumar

Prabu

Multi-response optimization of dry sliding wear parameters of AA6026 using hybrid gray relational analysis coupled with response surface method. Meas Control 2019; 52(5–6): 540–553.

26.

Rosensweig

Ferrohydrodynamics. Courier Corporation; 2013.