Enhancing energy efficiency of plate-tube and fin heat exchangers through thermo-hydraulic optimization using advanced nanofluids for low-carbon heating systems

Abstract

This study investigates the thermo-hydraulic optimization of plate-tube and fin heat exchangers using advanced nanofluids to enhance energy efficiency and support low-carbon heating systems. A multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) was employed to optimize the heat exchanger design by minimizing both volume and pumping power while maintaining thermal performance. The results demonstrate significant improvements in energy efficiency and compactness through the use of nanofluids, particularly CuO-based formulations. Compared to the baseline design, Solution A achieved a 21% reduction in heat exchanger volume (from 0.19 to 0.15 m³) and a 15.5% decrease in pumping power (from 116 to 98 W). These enhancements were attributed to optimized geometric parameters, including shorter tube lengths (0.7 m vs 0.8 m), smaller tube diameters (13 mm vs 15 mm), thinner fins (0.25 mm vs 0.3 mm), and the implementation of CuO nanoparticles with a higher volume fraction (2% vs 1.5%). Sensitivity analyses revealed that increasing nanoparticle volume fractions, tube diameters, and fin densities improved thermal efficiency but required careful consideration of trade-offs involving pumping power and heat exchanger size. Additionally, CuO-based nanofluids outperformed Al₂O₃-based counterparts in terms of thermal efficiency (0.83 vs 0.81), pumping power (112 W vs 116 W), and heat exchanger volume (0.18 m³ vs 0.19 m³). Overall, this research highlights the potential of nanofluid-enhanced heat exchangers to significantly augment energy efficiency and reduce the carbon footprint of HVAC&R systems, providing valuable insights for designing environmentally sustainable thermal systems.

Keywords

Plate-tube and fin heat exchanger nanofluid thermo-hydraulic optimization energy efficiency heating system

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wen

Zhong

, et al. Thermal properties measurement and performance evaluation of water/zno nanofluid in a mini channel with offset fins. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2020; 162: 120361.

Garg

Alvarado

Marsh

, et al. An experimental study on the effect of ultrasonication on viscosity and heat transfer performance of multi-wall carbon nanotube-based aqueous nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2009; 52(21–22): 5090–5101.

Hussien

Abdullah

Yusop

, et al. Experiment on forced convective heat transfer enhancement using MWCNTs/GNPs hybrid nanofluid and mini-tube. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2017; 115: 1121–1131.

Albadr

Tayal

Alasadi

. Heat transfer through heat exchanger using Al2O3 nanofluid at different concentrations. Case Stud Therm Eng 2013; 1(1): 38–44.

Shahrul

Mahbubul

Saidur

, et al. Experimental investigation on Al2O3-W, SiO2-W and ZnO-W nanofluids and their application in a shell and tube heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2016; 97: 547–558.

Farajollahi

Etemad

Hojjat

. Heat transfer of nanofluids in a shell and tube heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2010; 53(1-3): 12–17.

Barzegarian

Aloueyan

Yousefi

. Thermal performance augmentation using water based Al2O3-gamma nanofluid in a horizontal shell and tube heat exchanger under forced circulation. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 86: 52–59.

Shahrul

Mahbubul

Saidur

, et al. Effectiveness study of a shell and tube heat exchanger operated with nanofluids at different mass flow rates. Numer Heat Transf A Appl 2014; 65(7): 699–713.

Sarafraz

Nikkhah

Nakhjavani

, et al. Fouling formation and thermal performance of aqueous carbon nanotube nanofluid in a heat sink with rectangular parallel microchannel. Appl Therm Eng 2017; 123: 29–39.

10.

Mohammadi

Taheri

Passandideh-Fard

, et al. Electronic chipset thermal management using a nanofluid-based mini-channel heat sink: an experimental study. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2020; 118: 104836.

11.

Huang

Sunden

. Pressure drop and convective heat transfer of Al2O3/water and MWCNT/water nanofluids in a chevron plate heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2015; 89: 620–626.

12.

Wang

Han

, et al. Experimental comparative evaluation of a graphene nanofluid coolant in miniature plate heat exchanger. Int J Therm Sci 2018; 130: 148–156.

13.

Kumar

Tiwari

Ghosh

. Effect of variable spacing on performance of plate heat exchanger using nanofluids. Energy 2016; 114: 1107–1119.

14.

Maré

Halelfadl

Sow

, et al. Comparison of the thermal performances of two nanofluids at low temperature in a plate heat exchanger. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2011; 35(8): 1535–1543.

15.

Zheng

Wang

Chen

, et al. Performance analysis of a plate heat exchanger using various nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2020; 158: 119993.

16.

Tiwari

Ghosh

Sarkar

. Performance comparison of the plate heat exchanger using different nanofluids. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2013; 49: 141–151.

17.

Arjun

Rakesh

. Heat transfer enhancement using alumina nanofluid in circular micro channel. Eng Sci Technol 2017; 12(1): 265–279.

18.

Nojoomizadeh

Karimipour

. The effects of porosity and permeability on fluid flow and heat transfer of multi-walled carbon nanotubes suspended in oil (MWCNT/Oil nanofluid) in a microchannel filled with a porous medium. Phys. E 2016; 84: 423–433.

19.

Rashmi

Khalid

Ismail

, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of heat transfer in CNT nanofluids. J Exp Nanosci 2013; 10(7): 545–563.

20.

Ajeeb

Murshed

SMS

. Nanofluids in compact heat exchangers for thermal applications: a state-of-the-art review. Therm Sci Eng Prog 2022; 30: 101276.

21.

Liu

Tao

Shi

, et al. Experimental investigation on the use of cuo/water nanofluid in horizontal spiral-coil ground heat exchanger. Int J Refrig 2023; 149: 204–223.

22.

Zhang

Chen

Wang

. Multi-objective optimization of elliptical tube fin heat exchangers based on neural networks and genetic algorithm. Energy 2023; 269: 126729.

23.

Riyadi

TWB

Herawan

Tirta

, et al. Nanofluid heat transfer and machine learning: insightful review of machine learning for nanofluid heat transfer enhancement in porous media and heat exchangers as sustainable and renewable energy solutions. Results Eng 2024; 24: 103002.

24.

Kays

London

(eds). Compact heat exchangers. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, 1984.

25.

Incropera

DeWitt

(eds). Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2007.

26.

Holman

(ed.). Heat transfer. 9th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill International Book Company, 2002.

27.

Shah

Sekulić

. Fundamentals of heat exchanger design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2003.

28.

Schmidt

. Heat transfer calculations for extended surfaces. Refrig Eng 1949; 57(4): 351–357.

29.

Wang

Chi

Chang

. Heat transfer and friction characteristics of plain fin-and-tube heat exchangers. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2000; 43(15): 2693–2691.

30.

Gnielinski

. New equations for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flow. Int Chem Eng 1976; 16(2): 359–368.

31.

Rich

. The effect of fin spacing on the heat transfer and friction performance of multi-row plate fin-and-tube heat exchangers. ASHRAE Transactions 1975; 81(2): 307–317.

32.

Murshed

SMS

Leong

Yang

. Enhanced thermal conductivity of TiO2-water based nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci 2005; 44: 367–373.

33.

Vajjha

Das

. A review and analysis on influence of temperature and concentration of nanofluids on thermophysical properties, heat transfer and pumping power. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2012; 55: 4063–4078.

34.

Motahari

Barati

. Optimization of Nusselt number of Al2O3/water nanofluid using response surface methodology. Iran J Chem Chem Eng 2019; 38(3): 309–317.