Predicting the pedestrian pre-impact speed from the pedestrian projection distance and vehicle damage measurements

Abstract

Methods to estimate the pre-impact pedestrian speed from limited post-accident measurements are required both for biomechanics research and for legal applications following vehicle–pedestrian collisions, but none is currently available. Such a method is presented in this paper. A constant-inertial-property pedestrian model based on the conservation of momentum is first shown to predict satisfactorily the transverse offset of a pedestrian between the primary and secondary impacts in wrap-trajectory vehicle–pedestrian collisions and is then used in a Monte Carlo environment to predict the pedestrian pre-impact speed distribution utilizing an estimate of the vehicle speed based on the pedestrian projection distance, the ratio of the longitudinal offset to the transverse offset for the pedestrian primary and secondary contact locations on the vehicle (indicated by the primary and secondary vehicle damage locations) and, where available, information on the pedestrian gait stance at impact (derived from the injury location on the head). Separate analysis of recently published Fourier relationships between the transverse offset and the contact location on the head derived from modelling with Mathematical Dynamic Models (MADYMO) software is used to show that the gait stance is related to the location on the head of head injuries from the vehicle contact, and that contact locations significantly anterior or posterior of the coronal plane are predominant. Results from the constant-inertial-property pedestrian model show that significant differences occur between the ratio of the transverse offset to the longitudinal offset with the struck leg leading and the corresponding ratio with the struck leg lagging. The special case of nominally zero transverse offset between the primary and secondary damage locations from the contacts of the pedestrian with the vehicle is considered, and pedestrian speed confidence limits for accident reconstruction purposes are provided. Regression equations relating the pedestrian speed to the pedestrian projection distance and the ratio of the transverse offset to the longitudinal offset of the damage location on the vehicle are presented. These provide the first means to predict the pedestrian speed from limited post-accident damage locations on the vehicle and the pedestrian projection distance.

Keywords

Vehicle–pedestrian collision pedestrian speed prediction pedestrian wrap projection wrap-around ratio transverse offset longitudinal offset

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Global status report on road safety. Report, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.

ETSC, The safety of vulnerable road users in the Southern, Eastern and Central European Countries. 2005, European Traffic Safety Council.

Serre

Masson

Perrin

. Real accidents involving vulnerable road users: in-depth investigation, numerical simulation and experimental reconstitution with PMHS. J Crashworthiness 2007; 12(3): 227–234.

Simms

Wood

. Pedestrian risk from cars and sport utility vehicles – a comparative analytical study. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2006; 220(8): 1085–1100.

Van Rooij

Meissner

Bhalla

. A comparative evaluation of pedestrian kinematics and injury prediction for adults and children upon impact with a passenger car. SAE paper 2004-01-1606, 2004.

Simms

Wood

. Effects of pre-impact pedestrian position and motion on kinematics and injuries from vehicle and ground contact. Int J Crashworthiness 2006; 11(4): 345–356.

Simms

Wood

. Pedestrian and cyclist impact – a biomechanical perspective. Berlin: Springer, 2009.

Simms

Wood

Walsh

. Confidence limits for impact speed estimation from pedestrian projection distance. Int J Crashworthiness 2004; 9(2): 219–228.

Wood

Simms

. A hybrid model for pedestrian impact and projection. Int J Crashworthiness 2000; 5(4): 257–269.

10.

Wood

Simms

Walsh

. Vehicle–pedestrian collisions: validated models for pedestrian impact on projection. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2005; 219(2): 183–195.

11.

Wood

Walsh

. Pedestrian forward projection impact. Int J Crashworthiness 2002; 7(3): 285–305.

12.

Elliott

Augy

Simms

Wood

. Statistical prediction of pedestrian pre-impact speed based on post-accident vehicle damage. In: IRCOBI conference, Hanover, Germany, 15–16 September 2010, pp. 199–202. Bron: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury.

13.

Elliott

Simms

Wood

. Pedestrian head translation, rotation and impact velocity: the influence of vehicle speed, pedestrian speed and pedestrian gait. Accid Analysis Prevention 2012; 45: 342–353.

14.

Elliott

Augy

Simms

Wood

. Monte Carlo modeling to estimate pedestrian velocity from post-accident vehicle damage. In: International crashworthiness conference, Washington, DC 22–24 September 2010, paper 2010–008.

15.

MADYMO, human models manual, version 7.0. Delft: TNO, 2009.

16.

van Hoof

de Lange

Wismans

. Improving pedestrian safety using numerical human models. Stapp Car Crash J 2003; 47: 401–436.

17.

Elliott

Lyons

Kerrigan

. Predictive capabilities of the MADYMO multibody pedestrian model: three-dimensional head translation and rotation, head impact time and head impact velocity. Proc IMechE Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics 2012; 226(3): 266–277.

18.

Untaroiu

Meissner

Crandall

. Crash reconstruction of pedestrian accidents using optimisation techniques. Int J Impact Engng 2009; 36(2): 210–219.

19.

Pheasant

Haslegrave

. Bodyspace – anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work. London: Taylor & Francis, 2006.

20.

Wood

. Impact and movement of pedestrians in frontal collisions with vehicles. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 1988; 202(2): 101–110.

21.

Wood

. Application of a pedestrian impact model to the determination of impact speed. SAE paper 910814, 1991.

22.

Wood

. Application of a rigid body impact model to the pedestrian–car collision. In: IRCOBI conference, Bergisch-Gladbach, Federal Republic of Germany, 14–16 September 1988, pp. 241–252. Bron: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury.

23.

Wood

Elliott

Lyons

. Applications and limitations of wrap-around ratio to vehicle speed estimation in pedestrian collision analysis. Int J Crashworthiness 2012 (in revision).

24.

Subit

Kerrigan

Crandall

. T. Pedestrian–vehicle interaction: kinematics and injury analysis of four full scale tests. In: IRCOBI conference, Bern, Switzerland, 17–19 September 2008, pp. 275–294. Bron: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury.

25.

Crash Test Service (CTS), Germany. Test number 10920, http://www.crashtest-service.com/WEB_GB/start.asp (2002).

26.

Crash Test Service (CTS), Germany. Test number 10921, http://www.crashtest-service.com/WEB_GB/start.asp (2002).

27.

Crash Test Service (CTS), Germany. Test number 10924, http://www.crashtest-service.com/WEB_GB/start.asp (2002).

28.

Crash Test Service (CTS), Germany. Test number 12063, http://www.crashtest-service.com/WEB_GB/start.asp (2003).

29.

Crash Test Service (CTS), Germany. Test number 12467, http://www.crashtest-service.com/WEB_GB/start.asp.

30.

Crash Test Service (CTS), Germany. Test number 12594, http://www.crashtest-service.com/WEB_GB/start.asp (1998).

31.

Cookson

Cuerden

Richards

Manning

. A review of the causes of fatal pedestrians’ injuries resulting from collisions with car fronts – comparing vehicles registered in 2002 or later with earlier models. In: IRCOBI conference, York, UK, 9–11 September 2009, pp. 207–221. Bron: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury.