This paper reports the results of multi-body numerical simulation of a vehicle crash with a teenager pedestrian. A previous technique utilized for adult pedestrian impact is applied. The work starts with the determination of the masses for the various segments of the body of a teenager with a total mass of 45 kg and then switches to the construction of the dummy and the middle-class vehicle in the Visual Nastran environment. Simulations are performed for both frontal impacts and lateral impacts, when the vehicle is travelling at a constant speed and when the vehicle is braking, following the Euro NCAP rules on the subject. The results are analysed by calculating the values of the head injury criterion for the head and the values of the thoracic trauma index and 3 ms criterion for the chest; the injuries are assessed according to the current interpretation. Abbreviated injury scale curves are used to determine the dangerousness of the impact. Finally, the results are close to those obtained by applying the same technique to an adult pedestrian and other available data in the literature for an adult or a child.
SvobodaJBozekJ. Pedestrian protection – influence of bonnet design. In: 10th EAEC European automotive congress, Belgrade, Serbia, 30 May–1 June 2005, Vol 3, paper EAEC05YU-GS04, pp. 1095–1102. Red Hook, New York: Curran Asociates.
2.
ShinMKYiSIKwonOTParkGJ. Structural optimization of the automobile frontal structure for pedestrian protection and the low-speed impact test. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2008; 222(12): 2373–2387.
3.
NeilsonID. Vehicle safety – a review for 1993. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering1993; 207(2): 117–126.
4.
TyrellDCSeversonKJMarquisBP. Analysis of occupant protection strategies in train collisions. In: 1995 ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Crashworthiness and occupant protection in transportation systems, San Francisco, California, USA, 12–17 November 1995, AMD-Vol 210/BED-Vol 30, pp. 539–557. New York: ASME.
5.
CizekV. Structural analysis and optimization of car bonnet. MECCA2005; 3(2–3): 25–29.
6.
CarterEEbdonSNeal-SturgessC. Optimization of passenger car design for the mitigation of pedestrian head injury using a genetic algorithm. In: Genetic and evolutionary computation conference, Washington, DC, USA, 25–29 June 2005, pp. 2113–2120. New York: ACM Press.
7.
PohlakMMajakJEermeM. Optimization of car frontal protection systems. In: 6th international DAAAM Baltic conference on industrial engineering, Tallinn, Estonia, 24–26 April 2008, pp. 123–128. Tallinn: Tallinn University of Technology, 2008.
8.
BocchieriRTKirkpatrickSWNavarro-NorthrupC. Collision safety improvements for light rail vehicles operating in shared right of way street environments. In: ASME 2009 Rail Transportation Division fall technical conference, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, 20–21 October 2009, paper RTDF2009-18018, pp. 61–70. New York: ASME.
9.
ZhangWShivpuriR. Probabilistic design of aluminum sheet drawing for reduced risk of wrinkling and fracture. Reliability Engng System Safety2009; 94: 152–161.
10.
Directive 2003/102/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the protection of pedestrians and other vulnerable road users in a collision with a motor vehicle and prior thereto and amending Council Directive 70/156/EEC. Off J Eur Un2003; L321: 15–25.
11.
European Experimental Vehicles Committee. Proposals for methods to evaluate pedestrian protection for passenger cars.EEVC Working Group 10 Report, European Experimental Vehicles Committee/Comité Européen sur les Véhicules Expérimentaux, UN Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switzerland, November1994.
12.
European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP). Assessment protocol biomechanical limits version 4.1. Document, Euro NCAP, Brussels, Belgium, March2004.
13.
European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP). Assessment protocol pedestrian testing protocol version 4.3. Document, Euro NCAP, Brussels, Belgium, July2009.
14.
European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP). Child protection assessment protocol version 1.0c. Document, Euro NCAP, Brussels, Belgium, December2004.
15.
Japan Automobile Research Institute. Technical feasibility study on EEVC/WG17, pedestrian subsystem test. Document INF GR/PS/101, Japan Automobile Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 18June2004.
16.
ShenJVJinX-L. Improvement in numerical reconstruction for vehicle–pedestrian accidents. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2008; 222(1): 25–39.
17.
WoodDPSimmsCKWalshDG. Vehicle–pedestrian collisions: validated models for pedestrian impact and projection. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2005; 219(2): 183–195.
18.
YangJKLovsundPCavalleroCBonnoitJ. A human-body 3D mathematical model for simulation of car–pedestrian impacts. J Crash Prevention Injury Control2000; 2(2): 131–149.
19.
IshikawaHKajzerJSchroederG. Simulation of impact response of the human body in car–pedestrian accidents. SAE paper 933129, 1993.
20.
van RooijLBhallaKMeissnerM. Pedestrian crash reconstruction using multi-body modeling with geometrically detailed, validated vehicle models and advanced pedestrian injury criteria. In: 18th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Nagoya, Japan, 19–22 May 2003, paper 468. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
21.
MassonCArnouxJBrunetCCesariD. Pedestrian injury mechanisms & criteria a coupled experimental and finite element approach. In: 19th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Washington, DC, USA, 6–9 June 2005, paper 05-0335. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
22.
AndersonRWGLongADSerreT. Phenomenological continuous contact–impact modelling for multibody simulations of pedestrian–vehicle contact interactions based on experimental data. Nonlinear Dynamics2009; 58(1–2): 199–208.
23.
SulzerJKamalakkannanSWiechelJ. Simplified MADYMO model of the IHRA head-form impactor. SAE paper 200601-2349, 2006.
24.
HanYYangJMizunoKMatsuiY. A study on chest injury mechanism and the effectiveness of a head-form impact test for pedestrian chest protection from vehicle collisions. Safety Sci2012; 50(5): 1304–1312.
25.
XuJLiYLuGZhouW. Reconstruction model of vehicle impact speed in pedestrian–vehicle accident. Int J Impact Engng2009; 36: 783–788.
26.
DepriesterJPerrinCSerreTChalandonS. Comparison of several methods for real pedestrian accident reconstruction. In: 19th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Washington, DC, USA, 6–9 June 2005, paper 05-0333. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
27.
YangJYaoJOtteD. Correlation of different impact conditions to the injury severity of pedestrians in real world accidents. In: 19th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Washington, DC, USA, 6–9 June 2005, paper 05-0352. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
SvobodaJŠolcZ. Pedestrian protection – pedestrian in collision with personal car. Report, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Automotive and Aerospace Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, 2001.
30.
MarjouxDBaumgartnerDDeckCWillingerR. Head injury prediction capability of the HIC, HIP, SIMON and ULP criteria. Accid Analysis Prevention2008; 40(3): 1135–1148.
31.
BellaviaGVirzì MariottiG. Development of an anthropomorphic model for vehicle–pedestrian crash test. Ingegn Autoveicolo2009; 62(3–4): 48–56.
Le VeauBL. Biomeccanica del Movimento Umano. Rome: Verduci Editore, 1993.
34.
WinterDA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. New York: Wiley–Interscience, 1990.
35.
BartalesiRLorussiFTesconiM. Wearable kinesthetic system for capturing and classifying upper limb gesture. In: 1st joint Eurohaptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems, Pisa, Italy, 18–20 March 2005, pp. 535–536. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
36.
AstoriP. Aspetti biomeccanici nei fenomeni d’urto. Lezione nell’ambito del corso: dinamica del movimento umano, Centre International des Sciences Mécaniques, Udine, Italy, 18–20 April 1996.
YeadonMR. The simulation of aerial movement – I. The determination of orientation angles from film data. J Biomech1990; 23(1): 56–66.
40.
YeadonMR. The simulation of aerial movement – II. A mathematical inertia model of the human body. J Biomech1990; 23(1): 67–7488
41.
YeadonMR. The simulation of aerial movement – III. The determination of the angular momentum of the human body. J Biomech1990; 23(1): 75–83.
42.
YeadonMRAthaJHalesFD. The simulation of aerial movement – IV. A computer simulation model. J Biomech1990; 23(1): 85–89.
43.
BrauneWFisherO. Über den Schwerpunkt des menschlichen Körpers, mit rucksicht auf die Ausrüstung des deutschen Infanteristen, Abhandlungen der Mathematisch–Physischen Klasse der Saechsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Leipzig: Hirzel, 1889.
44.
KalepsIClauserCEYoungJW. Investigation into the mass distribution properties of the human body and its segments. Ergonomics1984; 27(12): 1225–1237.
45.
RodariusCvan RooijLde LangeR. Scalability of human models. In: 20th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Lyon, France, 18–21 June 2007, paper 07-0314. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
46.
SchmittKUNiedererPFMuserMHWalzF. Trauma biomechanics: accidental injury in traffic and sports. London: Springer, 2007.
47.
NahumAMMelvinJW. Accidental injury: biomechanics and prevention. London: Springer, 2001.
48.
PrasadPMertzH. The position of the U.S. delegation to the ISO Working Group 6 on the use of HIC in the automotive environment. SAE paper 851246, 1985.
49.
KuppaS. Injury criteria for side impact dummies. NTBRC/NHTSA Document, National Transportation Biomechanics Research Center, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA, May2004.
50.
MassonCSerreTCesariD. Pedestrian–vehicle accident: analysis of 4 full scale tests with PMHS. In: 20th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Lyon, France, 18–21 June 2007, paper 07-0428. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
