Design and comparison of the handling performance of different electric vehicle layouts

Abstract

In contrast with conventional vehicles driven by an internal-combustion engine, the number of motors in fully electric cars is not fixed. A variety of architectural solutions, including from one to four individually controlled electric drive units, is possible and opens up new avenues in the design of vehicle characteristics. In particular, individual control of multiple electric powertrains promises to enhance the handling performance in steady-state and dynamic conditions. For the analysis and selection of the best electric powertrain layout based on the expected vehicle characteristics and performance, new analytical tools and metrics are required. This article presents and demonstrates a novel offline procedure for the design of the feedforward control action of the vehicle dynamics controller of a fully electric vehicle and three performance indicators for the objective comparison of the handling potential of alternative electric powertrain layouts. The results demonstrate that the proposed offline routine allows the desired understeer characteristics to be achieved with any of the investigated vehicle configurations, in traction and braking conditions. With respect to linear handling characteristics, the simulations indicate that the influence of torque-vectoring is independent of the location of the controlled axles (front or rear) and is considerably affected by the number of controlled axles.

Keywords

Electric vehicles torque vectoring optimisation yaw moment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Khaligh

. Battery, ultracapacitor, fuel cell, and hybrid energy storage systems for electric, hybrid electric, fuel cell, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: state of the art. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2010; 59(6): 2806–2814.

Zeraoulia

El Hachemi Benbouzid

Diallo

. Electric motor drive selection issues for HEV propulsion systems: a comparative study. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2006; 55(6): 1756–1764.

Rinderknecht

Meier

. Electric power train configurations and their transmission systems. In: International symposium on power electronics, electrical drives, automation and motion, Pisa, Italy, 14–16 June 2010, pp. 1564–1568. New York: IEEE.

Hoehn

Stahl

Gwinner

Wiesbeck

. Torque-vectoring driveline for electric vehicles. In: FISITA world automotive congress, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol 191, Bejing, People’s Republic of China, 27–30 November 2012, pp. 585–593. Berlin: Springer.

De Novellis

Sorniotti

Gruber

. Torque-vectoring for electric vehicles with individually controlled motors: state-of-the-art and future developments. In: 26th electric vehicle symposium, Los Angeles, California, USA, 6–9 May 2012. Red Hook, New York: Curran Associates. D 7.2.

De Novellis

Sorniotti

Gruber

. Optimal wheel torque distribution for a four-wheel-drive fully electric vehicle. SAE paper 2013-01-0673, 2013.

Crolla

Cao

. The impact of hybrid and electric powertrains on vehicle dynamics, control systems and energy recuperation. Veh System Dynamics 2012; 50(Suppl 1): 95–109.

van Zanten

Erhardt

Pfaff

. VDC, the vehicle dynamics control system of Bosch. SAE paper 950749, 1995.

Goodarzi

Alirezaie

. A new fuzzy-optimal integrated AFS/DYC control strategy. In: 8th international symposium on advanced vehicle control, Taipei, Republic of China, 20–24 August 2006, paper AVEC060050, pp. 65–70. Tokyo: JSAE.

10.

Nagai

Shino

Gao

. Study on integrated control of active front steer angle and direct yaw moment. JSAE Rev 2002; 23(3): 309–315.

11.

Abe

. A Theoretical analysis on vehicle cornering behaviors in acceleration and in braking. Veh System Dynamics 1986; 15(Suppl 1): 1–14.

12.

Nagai

Hirano

Yamanaka

. Integrated control of active rear wheel steering and direct yaw moment control. Veh System Dynamics 1997; 27(5–6): 357–370.

13.

Shimada

Shibahata

. Comparison of three active chassis control methods for stabilizing yaw moments. SAE paper 940870, 1994.

14.

van Zanten

. Bosch ESP systems: 5 years of experience. SAE paper 2000-01-1633, 2000.

15.

Canale

. Vehicle yaw control via second-order sliding-mode technique. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2008; 55(11): 3908–3916.

16.

Chang

Gordon

. Model-based predictive control of vehicle dynamics. Int J Veh Autonomous Systems 2007; 5(1–2): 3–27.

17.

Koibuchi

Yamamoto

Fukada

Inagaki

. Vehicle stability control in limit cornering by active brake. SAE paper 960487, 1996.

18.

Hattori

. Optimum vehicle dynamics control based on tyre driving and braking forces. R&D Toyota CRDL 2003; 38(4): 23–29.

19.

Graf

Lienkamp

. Torque vectoring control design based on objective driving dynamic parameters. In: FISITA world automotive congress, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol 196, Bejing, People’s Republic of China, 27–30 November 2012, pp. 1787–1796. Berlin: Springer.

20.

ISO 8855:2011 Road vehicles – vehicle dynamics and road-holding ability – vocabulary. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2011.

21.

Sawase

Ushiroda

Miura

. Left–right torque-vectoring technology as the core of super all wheel control (S-AWC). Mitsubishi Motors Tech Rev 2006; 18: 18–24.

22.

Gao

. Dynamic lithium-ion battery model for system simulation. IEEE Trans Components Packag Technol 2002; 25(3): 495–505.

23.

IPG Automotive. CarMaker^®, http://www.ipg.de/CarMaker.609.0.html (2013, accessed 25 April 2013).

24.

Amann

Böcker

Prenner

. Active damping of drive train oscillations for an electrically driven vehicle. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 2004; 9(4): 697–700.

25.

ISO 4138:2012 Passenger cars – steady-state circular driving behaviour – open-loop test methods. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2012.

26.

ISO 7401:2011 Road vehicles – lateral transient response test methods – open-loop test methods. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2011.

27.

Milliken

. Race car vehicle dynamics. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: SAE International, 1995.

28.

Shibahata

Shimada

Tomari

. Improvement of vehicle maneuverability by direct yaw moment control. Veh System Dynamics 1993; 22(5–6): 465–481.

29.

Tanaka

Kawamoto

Inagaki

. Regenerative braking electric vehicle with four motors. US Patent 5148883, 1992.

30.

Genta

. Motor vehicle dynamics: modelling and simulation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 1997.

31.

Alexander

Allison

Papalambros

. Decomposition-based design optimisation of electric vehicle powertrains using proper orthogonal decomposition. Int J Powertrains 2011; 1(1): 72–92.

32.

Coleman

. An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM J Optimization 1996; 6(2): 418–445.

33.

Sawase

Ushiroda

. Improvement of vehicle dynamics by right-and-left torque-vectoring system in various drivetrains. Mitsubishi Motors Tech Rev 2007; 20:14–20.