A new robust control method for active front steering considering the intention of the driver

Abstract

The influence of the active front steering system on the driver’s intention and the trade-off between the robustness and the performance of the active front steering controller have not been adequately addressed by current research studies. A new robust control method based on the normalized left coprime factorization model including uncertainty and perturbations is introduced, and the robustness of this method against high speeds and variations in the cornering stiffness without changing the intention of the driver is guaranteed by the design of the feedforward controller and the feedback controller. A single-step method is adopted to solve the feedforward robust controller and the feedback robust controller. The resulting controllers obtained by the proposed robust control method have a simple structure and do not require online optimization. Furthermore, simulations of the double-lane-change manoeuvre and of braking on a split-μ road are conducted to compare the performance and the stability of the new robust control method with those of the proportional–integral–derivative controller and the standard H_∞ controller. Simulation results show that, in comparison with the other two control methods, the established new robust control method can enhance the vehicle stability and handling, and the tracking rapidity is improved by the introduction of feedforward control so that the active steering intervention does not affect the driver’s intention, regardless of the external interferences or emergency evasive manoeuvres.

Keywords

Active front steering driver’s intention coprime factorization double lane change

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hebden

Edwards

Spurgeon

. Automotive steering control in a split-µ manoeuvre using an observer-based sliding mode controller. Veh System Dynamics 2004; 41(3): 181–202.

Koehn

Eckrich

. Active steering – the BMW approach towards modern steering technology. SAE paper 2004-01-1105, 2004.

Ackermann

Odenthal

Bünte

. Advantages of active steering for vehicle dynamics control. In: 32nd ISATA conference on automotive mechatronics design and engineering, Vienna, Austria, 14–18 June 1999, pp. 263–270. Croydon: ISATA.

March

Shim

. Integrated control of suspension and front steering to enhance vehicle handling. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2007; 221(4): 377–391.

. PID plus fuzzy logic method for torque control in traction control system. Int J Automot Technol 2012; 13(3): 441–450.

Falcone

Borrelli

Tseng

. Linear time-varying model predictive control and its application to active steering systems: stability analysis and experimental validation. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 2008; 18(8): 862–875.

Zhu

Jin

. Real-time yaw rate prediction based on a non-linear model and feedback compensation for vehicle dynamics control. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2013; 227(10): 1431–1445.

Song

. Comprehensive prediction method of road friction for vehicle dynamics control. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2009; 223(8): 987–1002.

Ackermann

Bünte

. Handling improvement for robustly decoupled car steering dynamics. In: 4th IEEE Mediterranean symposium on new directions in control and automation, Maleme, Crete, Greece, 10–13 June 1996, pp. 83–88. New York: IEEE.

10.

Ackermann

Bünte

. Handling improvement of robust car steering. In: International conference on advances in vehicle control and safety, Amiens, France, 1–3 July 1998, pp. 112–117.

11.

Ono

Hattori

Muragishi

. Vehicle dynamics integrated control for four-wheel- distributed steering and four-wheel-distributed traction/braking systems. Veh System Dynamics 2006; 44(2): 139–151.

12.

Shen

. Study on vehicle chassis control integration based on a main-loop–inner-loop design approach. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2006; 220(11): 1491–1502.

13.

Ono

Hosoe

Tuan H

. Bifurcation in vehicle dynamics and robust front wheel steering control. IEEE Trans Control Systems Technol 1998; 6(3): 412–420.

14.

Mammar

Koenig

. Vehicle handling improvement by active steering. Veh System Dynamics 2002; 3(38): 211–242.

15.

Tang

Zheng

. Integrated control system design of active front wheel steering and four wheel torque to improve vehicle handling and stability. Int J Automot Technol 2007; 8(3): 299–308.

16.

. Nonlinear robust control of integrated vehicle dynamics. Veh System Dynamics 2012; 50(2): 247–280

17.

Liu

. Matching strategy of electric power steering assistant characters based on the vehicle inherent road feel. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2011; 225(11): 1481–1491.

18.

Yang

Wang

. Linear parameter varying modeling method based gain-scheduling control of yaw moment for vehicle stability. J Mech Engng 2009; 45(1): 300–308.

19.

Baslamisli

SÇ

Köse

İE

Anlaş

. Gain-scheduled integrated active steering and differential control for vehicle handling improvement. Veh System Dynamics 2009; 47(1): 99–119.

20.

Pacejka

. Tyre and vehicle dynamics. Oxford: Butterworth–Heinemann, 2002.

21.

Guo

Pan

Cheng

Ding

. Driver model based on the preview optimal artificial neural network. In: 6th international symposium on advanced vehicle control, Hiroshima, Japan, 9–13 September 2002, JSAE paper 20024590. Tokyo: JSAE.

22.

Li H

Song

. Comprehensive lateral driver model for critical maneuvering conditions. Int J Automot Technol 2011; 12(5): 679–686.

23.

Glover

McFarlane

. Robust stabilization of normalised coprime factor plant descriptions with H_∞ bounded uncertainty. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1989; 34(8): 821–830.

24.

McFarlane

Glover

. A loop shaping design procedure using H_∞ synthesis. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1992; 37(6): 759–769.