Topology,size and shape optimization of an automotive cross car beam

Abstract

An automotive cross car beam supports instrument panels including the heating, ventilation and air-conditioning system, the knee airbags, the steering-column and steering-wheel system and the central console. Avoiding resonant frequencies and improving driving comfort are major performance requirements in the design of a cross car beam. Because of the nature of mass production in the automotive industry, the consideration of manufacturability is important, and the current practice in the industry does grant detailed information on the steering-column and steering-wheel system to the cross car beam designer. The objective of this paper is to perform a complete topology, size and shape optimization of a cross car beam by using a lightweight material, by considering two practical manufacturing processes (extrusion and casting) and by assuming a realistic situation where only limited information on the steering-column and steering-wheel system is available to the cross car beam designer. First, a simplified finite element model of the steering-column and steering-wheel system was developed, and it was calibrated using optimization such that the important behaviour of the simplified finite element model agrees with that of the real steering-column and steering-wheel system. Topology optimization was performed to determine the optimal material distribution for the parts that connect the steering-column and steering-wheel system and the cross car beam. Then a geometry reinterpretation of the favourable topology result was performed to address the concerns from the viewpoints of the cost and the manufacturability. A sensitivity study was conducted subsequently to determine the size optimization design variables with significant effects on the frequency performance. Finally, size and shape optimization were performed together to optimize further the details of the cross car beam structure. The weight of the optimal aluminium design was reduced by nearly 40% compared with the steel design while the important performance requirements are met.

Keywords

Cross car beam topology optimization size and shape optimization automotive design lightweight design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Woisetschlaeger

. Keine Monokultur. Automobile Entwicklung 2001: 130.

Wallentowitz

. Structural design of vehicles. Aachen: Institut für Kraftfahrwesen Aachen, 2004.

Kim

. Conceptual and detailed design of an automotive engine cradle by using topology, shape and size optimization. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization August 2014: 1–18. DOI:10.1007/s00158-014-1151-6

Schultz

. The past, present and future of aluminum in North American light vehicles. Ducker Worldwide Michigan 16 October 2012: 20.

OICA, Organisation Internationale des Constructeurs d’Automobiles. Production statistics, http://www.oica.net/category/production-statistics/ (31 January 2014).

Yildiz

. A new hybrid particle swarm optimization approach for structural design optimization in automotive industry. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2012; 226(10): 1340–1351.

Yildiz

Solanki

. Multi-objective optimization of vehicle crashworthiness using a new particle swarm based approach. Int J Advd Mfg Technol 2012; 59(1–4): 367–376.

Yildiz

Öztürk

Kaya

Öztürk

. Hybrid multi-objective shape design optimization using Taguchi’s method and genetic algorithm. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2007; 34(4): 317–332.

Yildiz

. Comparison of evolutionary based optimization algorithms for structural design optimization. Engng Applic Artif Intell 2013; 26(1): 327–333.

10.

Yildiz

. A new design optimization framework based on immune algorithm and taguchi method. Comput Ind 2009; 60(8): 613–620.

11.

Durgun

Yildiz

. Structural design optimization of vehicle components using cuckoo search algorithm. Mater Test 2012; 54(3): 185–188.

12.

Craig

Stander

Dooge

Varadappa

. Automotive crashworthiness design using response surface-based variable screening and optimization. Engng Comput 2005; 22 (1): 38–61.

13.

Sinha

. Reliability-based multiobjective optimization for automotive crashworthiness and occupant safety. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2007; 33: 255–268.

14.

Jansson

Andersson

Nilsson

. Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part: an evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces. J Mater Processing Technol 2005; 159: 426–434.

15.

Yim

Lee

Pyun

. A study on optimum design for thin walled beam structures of vehicles. SAE paper 2002-01-1987, 2002.

16.

Baskar

Kamat

Lange

. Analytical robust door hinge system design Taguchi approach. SAE paper 982306, 1998.

17.

Kim

Park

. Nonlinear dynamic response structural optimization using equivalent static loads. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engng 2010; 199: 660–676.

18.

Yang

Chahande

. Automotive applications of topology optimization. Struct Optimization 1995; 9: 245–249.

19.

Cavazzuti

Baldini

Bertocchi

. High performance automotive chassis design: a topology optimization based approach. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2011; 44: 45–56.

20.

Forsberg

Nilsson

. Topology optimization in crashworthiness design. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2007; 33: 1–12.

21.

Lee

Park

. Topology optimization for structures with nonlinear behaviour using the equivalent static loads method. Trans ASME, J Mech Des 2012; 134: 1–14.

22.

Wang

Basu

Leiva

. Automobile body reinforcement by finite element optimization. Finite Elements Analysis Des 2004; 40: 879–893.

23.

Waquas

Fan

Wang

. Application of topology optimization and manufacturing simulations – a new trend in design of aircraft components. In: International multiconference of engineers and computer scientists, Hong Kong, 19–21 March 2008, Vol II, pp. 19–21. Hong Kong: IAENG.

24.

Kim

Kwak

. Design space optimization using a numerical design continuation method. Int J Numer Methods Engng 2002; 53(8): 1979–2002.

25.

Boyle

Kim

. Three-dimensional micro-level computational study of Wolff’s law via trabecular bone remodeling in the human proximal femur using design space topology optimization. J Biomech 2011; 44: 935–942.

26.

Maute

Frangopol

. Reliability-based design of MEMS mechanisms by topology optimization. Comput Structs 2003; 81: 813–824.

27.

Kim

Mechefske

. A new efficient convergence criterion for reducing computational expense in topology optimization: reducible design variable method. Int J Numer Methods Engng 2012; 90: 752–783.

28.

Kim

Mechefske

Kim

. Optimal damping layout in a shell structure using topology optimization. J Sound Vibr 2013; 332: 2873–2883.

29.

Yildiz

Saitou

. Topology synthesis of multicomponent structural assemblies in continuum domains. Trans ASME, J Mech Des 2011; 133: 011008–011009.

30.

Luo

Tan

. Lightweight design of an in-wheel motor using the hybrid optimization method. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2013; 227(11): 1590–1602.

31.

Kim

Jang

. Development of a lightweight frame for a 40-foot flatbed trailer by using CAE-based structural optimization. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2011; 225(5): 643–652.

32.

Lee

, Structural optimization concept for the design of an aluminium control arm. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2003; 217(8): 647–656.

33.

Lee

Shin

Song

. Automotive door design using structural optimization and design of experiments. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2003; 217(10): 855–865.

34.

Yildiz

Kaya

Öztürk

. Optimal design of vehicle components using topology design and optimisation. Int J Veh Des 2004; 34 (4): 387–398.

35.

Yildiz

. Optimal structural design of vehicle components using topology design and optimization. Mater Test 2008; 50(4): 224–228.

36.

Jang

Kim

Kwak

. Conceptual and basic designs of the Mobile Harbor crane based on topology and shape optimization. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2014; 50: 505–515.

37.

Zhu

Hou

Zhang

. Structural topology optimization with constraints on multi-fastener joint loads. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2014; 50: 561–571.

38.

Oktay

Hasan

Onur

. Three-dimensional structural topology optimization of aerial vehicles under aerodynamic loads. Comput Fluids 2014; 92: 225–232.

39.

Zhu

Zhang

Beckers

. Structural design of aircraft skin stretch-forming die using topology optimization. J Comput Appl Math 2013; 246: 278–288.

40.

Bogomolny

Amir

.Conceptual design of reinforced concrete structures using topology optimization with elastoplastic material modeling. Int J Numer Methods Engng 2012; 90: 1578–1597.

41.

Hamid

. Optimization of a modular cockpit cross car beam for crashworthiness. SAE paper 2002-01-0938, 2002.

42.

Lam

Behdinan

Cleghorn

. A material and gauge thickness sensitivity analysis on the NVH and crashworthiness of automotive instrument panel support. Thin-Walled Structs 2003; 41: 1005–1018.

43.

da Silva

ARCR

. Early phase of the cross car beam concept development. MEng Dissertation, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, September 2013.

44.

Rahmani

. Multidisciplinary design optimization of automotive aluminum cross-car beam assembly. MApplSc Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, November 2013.

45.

Altair OptiStruct: OptiStruct 11.0 user manual. Troy, Michigan: Altair Engineering, Inc., 2011.

46.

Zhou

Shyy

Thomas

. Checkerboard and minimum member size control in topology optimization. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2001; 21: 152–158.

47.

Samareh

. A survey of shape parameterization techniques. In: CEAS/AIAA/ICASE/NASA Langley international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA, 22–25 June 1999, Report NASA/CP-1999-209136, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 333–343.

48.

Wernle

Colias

. Cars & concepts, Ford’s huge bet on aluminum. Automotive news, http://www.autonews.com/article/20140120/OEM04/301209910/fords-huge-bet-on-aluminum#axzz2rj4YP4eP (20 January 2014).